Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-12-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Thursday 30 November 2006 18:06, Sven Luther wrote:
[#397942]
  If this is correct, this bug can be closed. Is it correct?
 The bug should be retitled and reassigned to initramfs-tools, if it is not
 already.

It only makes sense to do this, if its confirmed, that initramfs-tools doesn't 
make sure the modules are loaded. I lack this confirmation atm.

Can someone confirm (or deny) that on a newly installed sid system, these 
modules are not loaded?

If so, I'm happy to open a bug against initramfs-tools, but I close this bug 
now, because the history of it is not interesting to read for the 
initramfs-tools maintainer anyway :)

 Holger: thanks for the work you are doing. Can you also comment on :
   #397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid
 flag to partitions.
 Maybe it would be worth to raise the severity of this bug, but i can hardly
 do this, or i will be seen as whiner who ups the severity of his pet bugs,
 can i ask you to have a look at them ?

I think the severity is right, if it's not a bit too high already :) RAID is 
not working, that's bad, but not the end of the world. So certainly not 
higher than important (which it is), maybe it's even normal. I'll leave it as 
it is.


regards,
Holger

-- 
quoting http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.de.html#codeofconduct
When using the Debian mailing lists, please follow these rules:... When 
replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to 
the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied.

We live in the year 2006, a few bytes wasted in the footer of a mail don't 
hurt anymore, but everybody is flooded with information and attention is a 
spare ressource. 
If you send a mail cc: to a list and to me, it will catch my attention even if 
I have none. Please don't. Unless you specifically want to catch my attention 
of course :) 
But If I don't say otherwise, I'm subscribed to the mailinglist (and this is 
true for non-Debian lists as well) and you don't need to cc: me. Thanks.


pgpbBmgZdPhzp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


2nd version of the patch for the errata about imac g5 fans(Re: g5 imacs now silent?)

2006-12-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Friday 01 December 2006 15:33, Charles Plessy wrote:
  Thanks for the information! Are those the latest G5 imacs? or the first
  ones?

 I think that it is the latest. For the moment, the windfarm drivers are
 available for powermacs 8,1 ; 9,1 ; and 11,2. (grep FARM
 /boot/config-2.6.*-powerpc64).

 You can find the correspondance between these codes and the commercial
 name in the following page: http://www.theapplemuseum.com/index.php?id=36

On Friday 01 December 2006 17:26, Étienne Bersac wrote:
 Those are the latest iMac G5 (first iMac with iSight).

Based on this information, I now propose the following patch (also attached) 
to the errata:

+   lion G5 Apple machines the fans are very loud, switch to a 
different 
+   console and run a 
href=http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/d-i/trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S05fancontrol-linux-powerpc?op=filesc=1;these
 
commands/a. This doesn't work on the latest modell (powermac 12,1 iSight) 
yet (not supported in the kernel)./li


regards,
Holger

-- 
quoting http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.de.html#codeofconduct
When using the Debian mailing lists, please follow these rules:... When 
replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to 
the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied.

We live in the year 2006, a few bytes wasted in the footer of a mail don't 
hurt anymore, but everybody is flooded with information and attention is a 
spare ressource. 
If you send a mail cc: to a list and to me, it will catch my attention even if 
I have none. Please don't. Unless you specifically want to catch my attention 
of course :) 
But If I don't say otherwise, I'm subscribed to the mailinglist (and this is 
true for non-Debian lists as well) and you don't need to cc: me. Thanks.
Index: errata.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -r1.97 errata.wml
--- errata.wml	17 Nov 2006 05:43:15 -	1.97
+++ errata.wml	2 Dec 2006 09:56:42 -
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@
 		lithe snd-powermac module is no longer loaded by default as
 		it will lock up some systems; you will need to add it to
 		tt/etc/modules/tt manually/li
+		lion G5 Apple machines the fans are very loud, switch to a different 
+		console and run a href=http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/d-i/trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S05fancontrol-linux-powerpc?op=filesc=1;these commands/a. This doesn't work on the latest modell (powermac 12,1 iSight) yet (not supported in the kernel)./li
 	/ul
 	/dd
 


pgpBxuumnByvs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-12-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 10:52:13AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Thursday 30 November 2006 18:06, Sven Luther wrote:
 [#397942]
   If this is correct, this bug can be closed. Is it correct?
  The bug should be retitled and reassigned to initramfs-tools, if it is not
  already.
 
 It only makes sense to do this, if its confirmed, that initramfs-tools 
 doesn't 
 make sure the modules are loaded. I lack this confirmation atm.

If the modules were loaded, the fan control would work.

 Can someone confirm (or deny) that on a newly installed sid system, these 
 modules are not loaded?

I think someone already posted a confirmation to this in another thread.

 If so, I'm happy to open a bug against initramfs-tools, but I close this bug 
 now, because the history of it is not interesting to read for the 
 initramfs-tools maintainer anyway :)

Bah. Hiding he history of this mess will not nevessarily make it go away.

  Holger: thanks for the work you are doing. Can you also comment on :
#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid
  flag to partitions.
  Maybe it would be worth to raise the severity of this bug, but i can hardly
  do this, or i will be seen as whiner who ups the severity of his pet bugs,
  can i ask you to have a look at them ?
 
 I think the severity is right, if it's not a bit too high already :) RAID is 
 not working, that's bad, but not the end of the world. So certainly not 

Neither RAID nor LVM is working i guess, this means that 3 of the 4 default
automated installation ways will fail, and furthermore fail without any hint
on why they fail.

 higher than important (which it is), maybe it's even normal. I'll leave it as 
 it is.

Ok. It would be neat if someone knowledgeable in partman would investigate
though.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-12-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Thursday 30 November 2006 23:04, Étienne Bersac wrote:
 Beware not to confuse iMac G5 rev AB and rev C (among PowerMac G5).
 iMac G5 rev C (chip PowerMac 12,1) do not have yet their windfarm
 driver. Benh told that he began the work on this driver but has
 difficulties to get access to de device. Benh, can you confirm ?

Thanks for the information! Are those the latest G5 imacs? or the first ones?


regards,
Holger


pgpkFKl7yQjXA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-12-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:45:18AM +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
 Hi,
 
 On Thursday 30 November 2006 23:04, Étienne Bersac wrote:
  Beware not to confuse iMac G5 rev AB and rev C (among PowerMac G5).
  iMac G5 rev C (chip PowerMac 12,1) do not have yet their windfarm
  driver. Benh told that he began the work on this driver but has
  difficulties to get access to de device. Benh, can you confirm ?
 
 Thanks for the information! Are those the latest G5 imacs? or the first ones?

I think that it is the latest. For the moment, the windfarm drivers are
available for powermacs 8,1 ; 9,1 ; and 11,2. (grep FARM
/boot/config-2.6.*-powerpc64). 

You can find the correspondance between these codes and the commercial
name in the following page: http://www.theapplemuseum.com/index.php?id=36

I conclude from the above discussion that the module
CONFIG_WINDFARM_PM81 also works with the PowerMac8,2.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-12-01 Thread Étienne Bersac
Those are the latest iMac G5 (first iMac with iSight).

Étienne.
-- 
Verso l'Alto !


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée


Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-11-30 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 this bug was originally about building certain windfarm drivers into the 
 kernel instead of modules, but it seems, that this was a red herring and the 
 current kernel in sid now includes working modules to turn the G5 fans 
 silent.
 
 If this is correct, this bug can be closed. Is it correct?

The bug should be retitled and reassigned to initramfs-tools, if it is not
already.

Or merged with other similar bugs if already present.

Holger: thanks for the work you are doing. Can you also comment on : 

  #397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
  to partitions.

Maybe it would be worth to raise the severity of this bug, but i can hardly do
this, or i will be seen as whiner who ups the severity of his pet bugs, can i
ask you to have a look at them ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: g5 imacs now silent?

2006-11-30 Thread Étienne Bersac
Hi,

Beware not to confuse iMac G5 rev AB and rev C (among PowerMac G5).
iMac G5 rev C (chip PowerMac 12,1) do not have yet their windfarm
driver. Benh told that he began the work on this driver but has
difficulties to get access to de device. Benh, can you confirm ?

Étienne.
-- 
Verso l'Alto !


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée