Re: ppc mplayer debian packages archive key
On 3/8/06, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:58:48AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > > On 3/8/06, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > > > > There is a patch wmv3-support-via-vc1.diff.gz in > > > > http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001545.html for adding wmv3 > > > > support. > > > > I have just tested it (rebuild packages from mplayer-g4 source) and it > > > > works. > > > > But I don't understand well the license in this patch. Can somebody > > > > tell me if I can use it ? > > > Any reason why this shouldn't be applied to mplayer upstream? Could you > > > ask on mplayer-dev? > > > > On his web site, the author said "the patch may have problem for > > upstream (and he will discuss this later)". > > [quote] patch 要進官方或許可能有問題 (稍後再談) [/quote] > > > > My English is not good for well understanding the license of libvc1 > > (used in the patch). I would like to be sure that it is legal for > > using this patch. > I doubt that it can go into mplayer CVS with the current license but > that's probably something the mplayer developers should discuss with the > author of the patch, could you contact them? Sorry I don't want to ask on mplayer-dev (my English is bad). Someone already asked the author, so I'll wait. Best regards, Bin > Cheers, > -- Guido > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFEDqb2n88szT8+ZCYRAkztAJ9k8eQ8LPEV80XBPc8jzK1U4zZPQACggE2R > qyGEPT73jORnUlg1Dg/BK2Q= > =SAjH > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ppc mplayer debian packages archive key
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:58:48AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > On 3/8/06, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > > > There is a patch wmv3-support-via-vc1.diff.gz in > > > http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001545.html for adding wmv3 > > > support. > > > I have just tested it (rebuild packages from mplayer-g4 source) and it > > > works. > > > But I don't understand well the license in this patch. Can somebody > > > tell me if I can use it ? > > Any reason why this shouldn't be applied to mplayer upstream? Could you > > ask on mplayer-dev? > > On his web site, the author said "the patch may have problem for > upstream (and he will discuss this later)". > [quote] patch 要進官方或許可能有問題 (稍後再談) [/quote] > > My English is not good for well understanding the license of libvc1 > (used in the patch). I would like to be sure that it is legal for > using this patch. I doubt that it can go into mplayer CVS with the current license but that's probably something the mplayer developers should discuss with the author of the patch, could you contact them? Cheers, -- Guido signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ppc mplayer debian packages archive key
On 3/8/06, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > > There is a patch wmv3-support-via-vc1.diff.gz in > > http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001545.html for adding wmv3 > > support. > > I have just tested it (rebuild packages from mplayer-g4 source) and it > > works. > > But I don't understand well the license in this patch. Can somebody > > tell me if I can use it ? > Any reason why this shouldn't be applied to mplayer upstream? Could you > ask on mplayer-dev? On his web site, the author said "the patch may have problem for upstream (and he will discuss this later)". [quote] patch 要進官方或許可能有問題 (稍後再談) [/quote] My English is not good for well understanding the license of libvc1 (used in the patch). I would like to be sure that it is legal for using this patch. Best regards, Bin > Cheers, > -- Guido > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFEDo+pn88szT8+ZCYRAqk6AJ9TliZ5/exaXzb2GaMpEFoizqdjQgCfWZ/H > eHnPy/b9TnTJt6jfINbyaOc= > =pf0x > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ppc mplayer debian packages archive key
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Bin Zhang wrote: > There is a patch wmv3-support-via-vc1.diff.gz in > http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001545.html for adding wmv3 > support. > I have just tested it (rebuild packages from mplayer-g4 source) and it works. > But I don't understand well the license in this patch. Can somebody > tell me if I can use it ? Any reason why this shouldn't be applied to mplayer upstream? Could you ask on mplayer-dev? Cheers, -- Guido signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ppc mplayer debian packages archive key
Hi, There is a patch wmv3-support-via-vc1.diff.gz in http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001545.html for adding wmv3 support. I have just tested it (rebuild packages from mplayer-g4 source) and it works. But I don't understand well the license in this patch. Can somebody tell me if I can use it ? Best regards, Bin
ppc mplayer debian packages archive key
Hi, I've just updated the gpg key used to sign the mplayer ppc packages's release file at: deb http://honk.sigxcpu.org/linux-ppc/debian/ mplayer/ The new key (key-id 0x3F041553506A0744) is available from: https://honk.sigxcpu.org/misc/sigxcpu-archive-key.gpg Please update your keyring via apt-key. Cheers, -- Guido signature.asc Description: Digital signature
