Bug#522417: ghostscript: Doesn't work with Brother printers

2011-04-09 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi,

Antonio Aguilar wrote:

> - Debian unstable (installed a week ago).
[...]
> - Brother HL-2030 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.6 [en] driver
>
> When I try to print with my Brother Hl-2030 it doesn't work.

Even though this may well be the same bug, could you file it
separately so it can be unmerged if appropriate?  I guess the package
to file against would be cups or foomatic-db, since that is the
"front-end" whose maintainers would know what information to get and
what back-end to blame it on.

> I have
> tried with ghostscript from stable (8.71) and unstable (9.01). When
> I try the Mike Simons reproducer it outputs this:
>
> $ /usr/bin/gs -r1200 -g10200x13200 -q -dNOPROMPT \
>   -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=bit -sOutputFile=- - -c quit \
>   < /usr/share/cups/data/testprint | wc
> GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>   8  56 630

If you get rid of the "| wc" then the result becomes more obvious:

| $ gs -r1200 -g10200x13200 -q -dNOPROMPT -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=bit \
|   -sOutputFile=- - -c quit < /usr/share/cups/data/testprint
| Error: /undefined in #CUPS-BANNER
| Operand stack:
| 
| Execution stack:
|%interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   
--nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   
--nostringval--   false   1   %stopped_push   1910   1   3   %oparray_pop   
1909   1   3   %oparray_pop   1893   1   3   %oparray_pop   1787   1   3   
%oparray_pop   --nostringval--   %errorexec_pop   .runexec2   --nostringval--   
--nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--
[...]

In other words, the testprint file is not a postscript file.
Debugging would require the full relevant pipeline; see

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Printing/Debugging#Finding_where_the_problem_lies

Looking at /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/printer/Brother-HL-2030.xml,
I see:

  B
  hl1250

> Finally I get working the printer using the foomatic drivers:
> Brother HL - 2030 Foomatic/hl1250

Ah, ok.  I suppose the failures happen with

  
gutenprint
  

My foomatic-db-fu is not so great, so the closest I could find is
/usr/share/foomatic/db/source/driver/gutenprint-ijs.5.2.xml which says

 
  
  gs -q -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=ijs 
-sIjsServer=ijsgutenprint.5.2 -dIjsUseOutputFD%A 
-sIjsParams="STP_VERSION=5.2.6,%B"%Z -sOutputFile=- -
 

i.e., device=ijs, not device=bit.

Changing "debug: 0" to "debug: 1" in /etc/foomatic/filter.conf and
looking at /tmp/foomatic-rip.log might be helpful.

> The CUPS  error's logs contains:
>
> E [09/Apr/2011:11:14:29 +0200] [Job 9] File
> '/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/sRGB Profile.icc' not found

This sounds interesting and worth reporting (or finding a similar
bug), too.  I don't know if it's related, either.

Thanks, and hope that helps.
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110409211740.GA4496@elie



Bug#522417: ghostscript: Doesn't work with Brother printers

2011-04-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-04-09 at 12:04pm, Antonio Aguilar wrote:
> - Debian unstable (installed a week ago).
> - Kernel 2.6.32 (due to graphics drivers incompatible, for now, with
> 2.6.38).
> - Brother HL-2030 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.6 [en] driver
> 
> When I try to print with my Brother Hl-2030 it doesn't work. I have
> tried with ghostscript from stable (8.71) and unstable (9.01). When
> I try the Mike Simons reproducer it outputs this:
> 
> aaguilar@MACHINE:~$ /usr/bin/gs -r1200 -g10200x13200 -q -dNOPROMPT
> -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=bit -sOutputFile=- - -c quit <
> /usr/share/cups/data/testprint | wc
> GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>   8  56 630
> aaguilar@MACHINE:~$ /usr/bin/gs -r1200 -g10200x13200 -q -dNOPROMPT
> -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=bit -sOutputFile=- - -c quit <
> /usr/share/cups/data/testprint | wc
> GPL Ghostscript 8.71: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>   9  60 647
> 
> The CUPS  error's logs contains:
> 
> E [09/Apr/2011:11:14:29 +0200] [Job 9] File
> '/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/sRGB Profile.icc' not found
> 
> E [09/Apr/2011:11:15:21 +0200] [Job 10] File
> '/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/sRGB Profile.icc' not found
> 
> I don't know if this is relative to the problem.

It might be related: In recent Debian releases of Ghostscript I ripped 
the included icclib library but forgot to instead link against the 
shared system library instead as intended.  This should be fixed with 
Ghostscript 9.0.2~dfsg-1 just uploaded a moment ago.  Please test if 
that works.

That one is also a new upstream release, with bugfixes related to color 
calibration, so even if it works now and not earlier on it might still 
be a different bug than the icclib breakage that is the cause.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#616024: marked as done (ghostscript: please provide debugging package)

2011-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:17:25 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#616024: fixed in ghostscript 9.02~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #616024,
regarding ghostscript: please provide debugging package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
616024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghostscript
Version: 9.01~dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist

Hey,

I'm experiencing segfaults with ghostscript (using it from epstopdf or
directly on eps files) and would like to provide a meaningful backtrace.
But as there's no -dbg package that means I have to rebuild it
completely with -g and -O0. It'd be nice to have the debugging symbols
somewhere.

Regards.
-- 
Yves-Alexis


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ghostscript depends on:
ii  debconf [de 1.5.38   Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils 3.4.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii  libc6   2.11.2-13Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libgs9  9.01~dfsg-2  interpreter for the PostScript lan

ghostscript recommends no packages.

Versions of packages ghostscript suggests:
ii  ghostscript-cups 9.01~dfsg-2 interpreter for the PostScript lan
ii  ghostscript-x9.01~dfsg-2 interpreter for the PostScript lan
pn  hpijs  (no description available)

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ghostscript
Source-Version: 9.02~dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ghostscript, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 616...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard  (supplier of updated ghostscript package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 06:56:28 +0200
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript gs-gpl gs-common ghostscript-cups ghostscript-x 
ghostscript-doc libgs9 libgs9-common libgs-dev ghostscript-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 9.02~dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Printing Team 
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard 
Description: 
 ghostscript - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF
 ghostscript-cups - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - CUPS 
filter
 ghostscript-dbg - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Debug 
symbo
 ghostscript-doc - interpreter for the PostScript l

Bug#615202: marked as done (libgs8: SEGV in gs when called from pstoraster (and in other contexts))

2011-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:17:25 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#615202: fixed in ghostscript 9.02~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #615202,
regarding libgs8: SEGV in gs when called from pstoraster (and in other contexts)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
615202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615202
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgs8
Version: 8.71~dfsg2-9
Severity: important
Tags: upstream

A SEGV can result when gs is invoked by pstoraster with the command
"/usr/bin/gs -dQUIET -dDEBUG -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dNOMEDIAATTRS
-sDEVICE=cups -sstdout=%stderr -sOUTPUTFILE=%stdout -c  -f -_", depending on
the input postscript file.

The problem arises because of the interaction between the "stringoption" macro
in cups/gdevcups.c:

#define stringoption(name, sname) \
  if ((code = param_read_string(plist, sname, &stringval)) < 0) \
  { \
dprintf2("ERROR: Error setting %s to \"%s\"...\n", sname, \
 (char *)(stringval.data));   \
param_signal_error(plist, sname, code); \
return (code); \
  } \
  else if (code == 0) \
  { \
dprintf2("DEBUG: Setting %s to \"%s\"...\n", sname, \
 (char *)(stringval.data));  \
strncpy(cups->header.name, (const char *)(stringval.data),  \
stringval.size); \
cups->header.name[stringval.size] = '\0'; \
  }

and the "param_read_string" function in base/gsparam.c:

int
param_read_string(gs_param_list * plist, gs_param_name pkey,
  gs_param_string * pvalue)
{
RETURN_READ_TYPED(s, gs_param_type_string);
}

The RETURN_READ_TYPED macro is as follows:

#define RETURN_READ_TYPED(alt, ptype)\
  gs_param_typed_value typed;\
  int code;\
\
  typed.type = ptype;\
  code = param_read_requested_typed(plist, pkey, &typed);\
  if ( code == 0 )\
*pvalue = typed.value.alt;\
  return code

The problem occurs if param_read_requested_typed returns a non-zero status. In
that case, pvalue is never set in param_read_string, which means that the value
from the stringoption macro is left uninitialised. "stringoption" then tries to
use that uninitialised value as a string parameter to dprintf2.


The following change to param_read_string will prevent the SEGV, and allow the
process (and the print job) to complete successfully:

int
param_read_string(gs_param_list * plist, gs_param_name pkey,
  gs_param_string * pvalue)
{
pvalue->data = 0;
pvalue->size = 0;
pvalue->persistent = 0;
RETURN_READ_TYPED(s, gs_param_type_string);
}

However it seems more likely that the correct fix is for stringoption not to
attempt to use the stringvalue variable on error, so that the macro would
appear as follows:

#define stringoption(name, sname) \
  if ((code = param_read_string(plist, sname, &stringval)) < 0) \
  { \
dprintf2("ERROR: Error setting %s...\n", sname); \
param_signal_error(plist, sname, code); \
return (code); \
  } \
  else if (code == 0) \
  { \
dprintf2("DEBUG: Setting %s to \"%s\"...\n", sname, \
 (char *)(stringval.data));  \
strncpy(cups->header.name, (const char *)(stringval.data),  \
stringval.size); \
cups->header.name[stringval.size] = '\0'; \
  }

However the correct fix may be a matter for upstream.

The impact of this bug is that some postscript files cannot be succesfully
printed at all to printers that require rasterisation.

I have an example file, but it contains configential so I can only provide it
if necessary out of band to the developer who will be fixing it. It may be
possible to duplicate this by configuring  a Windows 7 system to print to that
printer using a postscript driver, and printing a test page.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libgs8 dep

Bug#620970: marked as done (ghostscript: New Upstream (9.02))

2011-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:17:25 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#620970: fixed in ghostscript 9.02~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #620970,
regarding ghostscript: New Upstream (9.02)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
620970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620970
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghostscript
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

would be nice if you could upload ghostscript 9.02.

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ghostscript
Source-Version: 9.02~dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ghostscript, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 620...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard  (supplier of updated ghostscript package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 06:56:28 +0200
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript gs-gpl gs-common ghostscript-cups ghostscript-x 
ghostscript-doc libgs9 libgs9-common libgs-dev ghostscript-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 9.02~dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Printing Team 
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard 
Description: 
 ghostscript - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF
 ghostscript-cups - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - CUPS 
filter
 ghostscript-dbg - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Debug 
symbo
 ghostscript-doc - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - 
Documentati
 ghostscript-x - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - X11 
support
 gs-common  - Transitional dummy package for ghostscript
 gs-gpl - Transitional dummy package for ghostscript
 libgs-dev  - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Development
 libgs9 - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Library
 libgs9-common - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - common 
file
Closes: 615202 616024 620970
Changes: 
 ghostscript (9.02~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
 Closes: bug#620970. Thanks to Daniel Baumann.
 + Fixes crash in CUPS driver.
   Closes: bug#615202.
 .
   [ Jonas Smedegaard ]
   * Set libgs-dev to priority optional (not extra) to match override
 file.
   * Fix have libgs* depend on lib*-common, source-versioned to ensure
 sanity while allow binNMUs. Thanks to Niels Thykier.
   * Drop obsolete lintian overrides.
   * Fix stop stripping convenience library icclib from upstream source:
 Linkage against shared system library was not applied and is not yet
 working.
   * Update upstream download URL.  Tidy note

Re: Problems with libgs9

2011-04-09 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi,

Daniel Stender wrote:

> I am not so deep into this, is it a local problem or would be a bug
> report appropriate:
>
> trying to print anything always leads to:
> [ 8561.256399] usblp1: nonzero read bulk status received: -71
> [ 8561.606400] gs[4592]: segfault at 88 ip 7f3efe12c806 sp 
> 7fff43433690 error 4 in
> libgs.so.9.01[7f3efdf23000+4fa000]
> or similiar (and nothing happens).
>
> My setup: very up-to-date Linux Mint Debian/Debian Testing, Kernel
> 2.6.32-5, Cups 1.4.6-3, libgs9 9.01~dfsg-2. Printer is Canon MF 4140
> with vendor's Cups driver (cndrvcups-common, cndrvcups-ufr2-uk
> 2.20-2, proper 64bit RPMs converted with Alien).
>
> A couple of days ago it printed fine so I would guess everything is
> installed properly.

Could you install the ghostscript, ghostscript-dbg, libgs9, etc
packages from http://incoming.debian.org/ and try to get a stack
trace?  That would be very interesting.

My hunches are:

 1) This is a regression and a segfault, so it's probably a bug
(of insufficient validation of input from drivers, if nothing
else);

 2) Canon's ufr2 driver would be very interesting for inclusion in
the non-free repository that accompanies Debian, to help others
who want this driver.  Naturally that would make working on bugs
like this much easier.  AFAICT the license allows distribution.
Do you know anyone interested in working on that?

(For reference, the driver is at
http://support-asia.canon-asia.com/contents/ASIA/EN/0100270807.html
for example.)

 3) The UFR II (“ultra-fast rendering”) protocol is a winprinter
protocol used mostly for multifunction printers in the LBP and MF
series (imageRunner, etc).  Many printers supporting it also
accept PCL or postscript.

 4) No one I know of has acquired specifications or even started to
reverse-engineer it, to develop a free driver.  If you want to
work on this (please?) a good place to start might be
http://ww1.pragana.net/gdiprinters.html .

> Any pointers appreciated & greetings,

I'd suggest filing a bug once you get a backtrace and keeping us
posted about getting this printer to work "out of the box".

Thanks and hope that helps,
Jonathan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110409222835.GA5556@elie



ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-04-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb


Override entries for your package:
ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional text
ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - extra debug
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - optional doc
ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional text
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc - source text
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional text
gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - extra text
gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - extra text
libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel
libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - optional libs
libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional libs

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 615202 616024 620970 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8fx3-0007me...@franck.debian.org



Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2011-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Sat Apr  9 20:03:16 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libauthen-ntlm-perl
> tags 507669 + pending
Bug #507669 [wnpp] ITP: libauthen-ntlm-perl -- NTLM
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: ghostscript
> tags 615202 + pending
Bug #615202 [libgs8] libgs8: SEGV in gs when called from pstoraster (and in 
other contexts)
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: ghostscript
> tags 620970 + pending
Bug #620970 [ghostscript] ghostscript: New Upstream (9.02)
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
620970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620970
615202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615202
507669: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507669
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130237944225363.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Problems with libgs9

2011-04-09 Thread Daniel Stender
Hallo guys,

I am not so deep into this, is it a local problem or would be a bug report 
appropriate:

trying to print anything always leads to:
[ 8561.256399] usblp1: nonzero read bulk status received: -71
[ 8561.606400] gs[4592]: segfault at 88 ip 7f3efe12c806 sp 7fff43433690 
error 4 in
libgs.so.9.01[7f3efdf23000+4fa000]
or similiar (and nothing happens).

My setup: very up-to-date Linux Mint Debian/Debian Testing, Kernel 2.6.32-5, 
Cups 1.4.6-3, libgs9
9.01~dfsg-2. Printer is Canon MF 4140 with vendor's Cups driver 
(cndrvcups-common, cndrvcups-ufr2-uk
2.20-2,
proper 64bit RPMs converted with Alien).

A couple of days ago it printed fine so I would guess everything is installed 
properly.

Any pointers appreciated & greetings,
Daniel Stender





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da09959.1020...@danielstender.com



ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2011-04-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
(new) ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb extra debug
interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Debug symbols
 GPL Ghostscript is used for PostScript/PDF preview and printing.
 Usually as a back-end to a program such as ghostview, it can display
 PostScript and PDF documents in an X11 environment.
 .
 This package contains the debugging symbols for ghostscript, ghostscript-x,
 ghostscript-cups and libgs9.
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Changes: ghostscript (9.02~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * New upstream release.
Closes: bug#620970. Thanks to Daniel Baumann.
+ Fixes crash in CUPS driver.
  Closes: bug#615202.
 .
  [ Jonas Smedegaard ]
  * Set libgs-dev to priority optional (not extra) to match override
file.
  * Fix have libgs* depend on lib*-common, source-versioned to ensure
sanity while allow binNMUs. Thanks to Niels Thykier.
  * Drop obsolete lintian overrides.
  * Fix stop stripping convenience library icclib from upstream source:
Linkage against shared system library was not applied and is not yet
working.
  * Update upstream download URL.  Tidy note on DFSG repackaging copyright file.
  * Drop patches 0001 and 1001: Applied upstream.
  * Update copyright file:
+ (Re)add licensing of icclib.
+ Fix treat SunSoft part as exception (not separate license).
+ Reorder Files sections to match hints file.
+ Add new owners.
  * Update symbols files.
 .
  [ Didier Raboud ]
  * Add a -dbg package.
Closes: #616024.


Override entries for your package:
ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional text
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - optional doc
ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional text
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc - source text
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional text
gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - extra text
gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - extra text
libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel
libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb - optional libs
libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional libs

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 615202 616024 620970 


Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file.  It is ok otherwise, so please be patient.  New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.

You may have gotten the distribution wrong.  You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8xp7-0001ec...@franck.debian.org



Processing of ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2011-04-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.dsc
  ghostscript_9.02~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  gs-gpl_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  gs-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  libgs9-common_9.02~dfsg-1_all.deb
  ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  ghostscript-x_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  libgs9_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  libgs-dev_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8xov-0001qx...@franck.debian.org



Bug#522417: ghostscript: Doesn't work with Brother printers

2011-04-09 Thread Antonio Aguilar

Hello,

I have the same problem. My specs:

- Debian unstable (installed a week ago).
- Kernel 2.6.32 (due to graphics drivers incompatible, for now, with 
2.6.38).

- Brother HL-2030 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.6 [en] driver

When I try to print with my Brother Hl-2030 it doesn't work. I have 
tried with ghostscript from stable (8.71) and unstable (9.01). When I 
try the Mike Simons reproducer it outputs this:


aaguilar@MACHINE:~$ /usr/bin/gs -r1200 -g10200x13200 -q -dNOPROMPT 
-dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=bit -sOutputFile=- - -c quit < 
/usr/share/cups/data/testprint | wc

GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
  8  56 630
aaguilar@MACHINE:~$ /usr/bin/gs -r1200 -g10200x13200 -q -dNOPROMPT 
-dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=bit -sOutputFile=- - -c quit < 
/usr/share/cups/data/testprint | wc

GPL Ghostscript 8.71: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
  9  60 647

The CUPS  error's logs contains:

E [09/Apr/2011:11:14:29 +0200] [Job 9] File 
'/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/sRGB Profile.icc' not found


E [09/Apr/2011:11:15:21 +0200] [Job 10] File 
'/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/sRGB Profile.icc' not found


I don't know if this is relative to the problem.

Finally I get working the printer using the foomatic drivers: Brother HL 
- 2030 Foomatic/hl1250


Regards,

Antonio



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da02f3d.8030...@gmail.com