Bug#651736: ghostscript: segfault when using cups device for rastering w/ SAFER and Seiko PPD
Hi Ralph, Ralph A. Smith wrote: > ghostscript 8.71 segfaults when invoked by CUPS (via the pdftoraster filter) > to print to a Seiko Smart Label Printer (SLP) using the PPD provided > by Seiko (at www.siibusinessproducts.com). The offending ghostscript command > (with standard input from pstopdf|pdftopdf) is > > /usr/bin/gs -dQUIET -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=cups >-sstdout=%stderr -sOutputFile=%stdout -I/usr/share/cups/fonts >-r203x203 -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=236 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=68 >-dcupsBitsPerColor=1 -dcupsColorOrder=0 -dcupsColorSpace=3 >-scupsPageSizeName=AddressSmall -c -f - > > If the PARANOIDSAFER option is removed, the command succeeds, but it still > fails with SAFER instead. I can't reproduce this (I tried on an amd64 mostly-sid system with ghostscript and libgs8 8.71~dfsg2-9 and cups and libs 1.4.4-7+squeeze1). Any ideas? If no other obvious ways to make progress come up, here are some hints: - Please provide a PDF file and exact command line to reproduce it on a machine without the SLP driver installed. (The instructions would have to include installing the SLP driver if that's the only way to reproduce it.) - If you look at "dmesg" output, does it say which DSO segfaulted? - Rebuilding ghostscript with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='debug nostrip' and getting a backtrace by running gs with "gdb --args" as described at [1] would also be helpful. - Anyone who can reproduce this can take over what I was going to try, which is finding the patch that fixed the problem at git://git.ghostscript.com/ghostpdl.git using "git bisect". Hope that helps, Jonathan [1] http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111211220158.ga28...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net
Bug#651736: ghostscript: segfault when using cups device for rastering w/ SAFER and Seiko PPD
Package: ghostscript Version: 8.71~dfsg2-9 Severity: normal ghostscript 8.71 segfaults when invoked by CUPS (via the pdftoraster filter) to print to a Seiko Smart Label Printer (SLP) using the PPD provided by Seiko (at www.siibusinessproducts.com). The offending ghostscript command (with standard input from pstopdf|pdftopdf) is /usr/bin/gs -dQUIET -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=cups -sstdout=%stderr -sOutputFile=%stdout -I/usr/share/cups/fonts -r203x203 -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=236 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=68 -dcupsBitsPerColor=1 -dcupsColorOrder=0 -dcupsColorSpace=3 -scupsPageSizeName=AddressSmall -c -f - If the PARANOIDSAFER option is removed, the command succeeds, but it still fails with SAFER instead. The above command succeeds when using the precompiled gs 9.04 for linux-x86_64 from downloads.ghostscript.com, but all else from my Squeeze system. (The ghostscript folks mention that various cups rastering segfaults were fixed recently.) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ghostscript depends on: ii debconf [de 1.5.36.1 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 3.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre ii libc6 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgs8 8.71~dfsg2-9 The Ghostscript PostScript/PDF int ghostscript recommends no packages. ghostscript suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111211191751.15861.33956.reportbug@pindar.greenhouse
Bug#651735: marked as done (ghostscript-x fails to provide virtual package gs)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:05:34 -0600 with message-id <20111211190534.gb23...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> and subject line Re: ghostscript-x fails to provide virtual package gs has caused the Debian Bug report #651735, regarding ghostscript-x fails to provide virtual package gs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 651735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651735 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ghostscript-x Version: 9.04~dfsg-3 Documentation claims that ghostscript-x provides virtual package gs, but package kghostview-trinity fails to find any package "gs" after installation, and thus package kde-trinity fails to install. James --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- James wrote: > Documentation claims that ghostscript-x provides virtual package gs Which documentation is that? It would be nice to know so we can fix it. --- End Message ---
Bug#651735: ghostscript-x fails to provide virtual package gs
Package: ghostscript-x Version: 9.04~dfsg-3 Documentation claims that ghostscript-x provides virtual package gs, but package kghostview-trinity fails to find any package "gs" after installation, and thus package kde-trinity fails to install. James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rzolv-0005vg...@jasper.nurealm.net
Bug#635549: Stable update of hplip for CVE-2011-2722 (#635549) ?
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 20:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 14:58 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: > > > * Fix CVE-2011-2722 "Insecure tempfile handling" by patching the > > > culprit > > > code out. (Closes: #635549) > > > > I'm assuming the debug code isn't likely to be used that often? The > > upstream bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/809904>) > > implies that they were looking at replacing the code with a mkstemp() > > call, rather than removing it. If it's basically unused then patching > > it out should be okay though. > > fwiw, the above wasn't a rhetorical question. I was anticipating that > the next action would have been a reply, not an upload... Having said that, a reply wouldn't be unwelcome... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1323626527.4699.23.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
