Bug#654017: Updating the foo2zjs Uploaders list
tags 654017 +pending thanks Le lundi, 2 janvier 2012 01.13:05, Ricardo Mones a écrit : Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de has not been working on the foo2zjs package for quite some time. We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close that part of the file. Hi Ricardo, and thanks for your bugreport, I have committed your requested change to foo2zjs' packaging repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/foo2zjs.git;a=commitdiff;h=10a221d This will be part of the next upstream version upload (but probably not before). Cheers, OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#654017: Updating the foo2zjs Uploaders list
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 654017 +pending Bug #654017 [foo2zjs] Updating the foo2zjs Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132550045115648.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Orphaning of gutenprint
Le dimanche, 1 janvier 2012 15.36:21, Roger Leigh a écrit : Hi folks, Just a reminder that gutenprint is orphaned (#479397), and that it needs a maintainer. There will be a new stable release in a week or so, and I'll set the maintiner to packages...@bugs.debian.org unless anyone wishes to adopt it. I'm happy to continue as a co-maintainer, but I don't have the time or hardware to maintain, debug and bugfix. Hi Roger, and thanks for your past work on gutenprint, Although I confess that I don't understand much of the internals of Gutenprint, that I don't have access to hardware that needs it; that I don't have much time to debug and bugfix, I think it should probably be possible for me to maintain it together with Till, if he agrees. (I think I prefer to have gutenprint loosely maintained by myself under the Printing Team umbrella, than orphaned; at least that tries to keep all printing-related packages under a common umbrella. Finding more manpower than mine's is of course on the TODO). Till: would you consider maintaining gutenprint together with me in Debian, assuming that we could reach a reasonable agreement on the current Ubuntu diff? I think that maintaining everything in Debian first (or at least keeping the diff as minimal as possible) would help bring slightly more manpower to that area. Cheers, OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[bts-link] source package gutenprint
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gutenprint # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #625925 (http://bugs.debian.org/625925) # Bug title: Uses incorrect path to default colour profile # * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=101537aid=3299815group_id=1537 # * remote resolution changed: (?) - Fixed usertags 625925 + resolution-Fixed thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102164045.19437.92732.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
