Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Evening Here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/ is written that these releases are obsolete stable release Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (‘woody’) Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (‘potato’) For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/ the following : Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody). Security updates are discontinued as of June 30th, 2003. The same is not written for the 3.0 release that is declared osbolete like the 2.2. The question is : are Security updates created for the 3.0 release ? Yes. This should probably be mentioned on that page, but security for Woody will continue until either May 2006 or security support for Etch starts, whichever happens first. As Etch is currently scheduled for release late in 2006, this makes May 2006 a very likely end date for Woody security. http://www.debian.org/News/2005/20050708 -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE
Many thanks for the information provided. Marco Correnti ESACERT Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/10/2005 04:36 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc debian-project@lists.debian.org Subject Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Evening Here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/ is written that these releases are obsolete stable release Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (‘woody’) Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (‘potato’) For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/ the following : Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody). Security updates are discontinued as of June 30th, 2003. The same is not written for the 3.0 release that is declared osbolete like the 2.2. The question is : are Security updates created for the 3.0 release ? Yes. This should probably be mentioned on that page, but security for Woody will continue until either May 2006 or security support for Etch starts, whichever happens first. As Etch is currently scheduled for release late in 2006, this makes May 2006 a very likely end date for Woody security. http://www.debian.org/News/2005/20050708 -- Horms Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/10/2005 19:57 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc debian-project@lists.debian.org Subject Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in [EMAIL PROTECTED] The question is : are Security updates created for the 3.0 release ? Yes. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Binary data
Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:36:25AM +0900, Horms wrote: As Etch is currently scheduled for release late in 2006, this makes May 2006 a very likely end date for Woody security. I would say 'optimistically scheduled' instead of 'currently scheduled' :) -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe
-- __Kjetil TrøanzOap MediaGroupTlf: 99 16 83 59[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.zoapmedia.net
Prośba
Witam. Od jakiegoś czasu zacząłem kolekcjonować wszelkiego rodzaju gadżety co popewnym czasie przerodziło się w moją pasję. Byłbym wdzięczny waszej firmie jeżeli mógłbym otrzymać jakis drobny (bezpłatny) gadżet (smycz na klucze, otwieracz , ołówek , długopis, zapalniczkę). Proszę o kontakt e-mail. Pozdrawiam - Marcin Musiałek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woody release notes: is obsoleted by sarge now.
On Thursday 20 October 2005 04.36, Horms wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/ the following : Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody). Security updates are discontinued as of June 30th, 2003. The same is not written for the 3.0 release that is declared osbolete like the 2.2. [...] Yes. This should probably be mentioned on that page, [...] /me points to http://bugs.debian.org/323770 which even includes a patch and mentions the situation wrt security updates. (Yeah, I forgot to tag it when I filed the bug, but then the mail is short enough that somebody on d-www might have noticed the patch...) Can all DD commit to www? I didn't try, 'cause I don't usually just mess with others' content (I don't follow -www at all.) cheers -- vbi -- She ran the gamut of emotions from 'A' to 'B'. -- Dorothy Parker, on a Kate Hepburn performance pgpIe0COAqGKs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Woody release notes: is obsoleted by sarge now.
El jue, 20-10-2005 a las 21:32 +0200, Adrian von Bidder escribió: On Thursday 20 October 2005 04.36, Horms wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/ the following : Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody). Security updates are discontinued as of June 30th, 2003. The same is not written for the 3.0 release that is declared osbolete like the 2.2. [...] Yes. This should probably be mentioned on that page, [...] /me points to http://bugs.debian.org/323770 which even includes a patch and mentions the situation wrt security updates. (Yeah, I forgot to tag it when I filed the bug, but then the mail is short enough that somebody on d-www might have noticed the patch...) Can all DD commit to www? I didn't try, 'cause I don't usually just mess with others' content (I don't follow -www at all.) No, only if you are in webwml group. You should CC -www pointing to this, if you want to. -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Approaching VMware (and others) to get Debian listed as supported ?
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please do ask. I've been using vmware in a corporate environment as a host and as a guest without problems whatsoever with woody. And I know sarge works as well. Being officially listed as supported would be real nice for various reasons, if only for the stable releases. I went over to VMware today to talk to a couple of people and found out that practically the whole company is in Las Vegas for VMworld through the end of the week. I'll check with them early next week instead. Sorry about the delay. -- Ben Pfaff email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://benpfaff.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DCC (Debian Confusion Core) trademark negotiation status
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:01:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: This is some kind of insulting joke. There's been two articles on newsforge about this now, both by David Graham, who's the non-Debian guy on the SPI board (AIUI); the first, summarising mails on this list: http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/10/19/1444211tid=138 and the second, an interview with Ian Murdock: http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/10/19/1638239from=rss Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digital signature
