Re: state of the DSA nation

2009-03-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:

> we ask ... Paul Wise if they still want to do their ... merge.d.o
> services (see http://dsa.debian.org/hardware-wishlist/).

Yes, I plan to figure out some details between now and DebConf and do
some work on it during DebCamp.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: state of the DSA nation

2009-03-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Peter Palfrader  wrote:

> It also still has women.debian.org.  It might make sense to move that to
> widor, which is where wiki moved to.  Need to find out who is
> responsible for women.d.o.

That would be helix/Erinn Clark IIRC.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



First call for votes for the Debian Project Leader Elections 2009

2009-03-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary

Hi,

This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2009.

 Voting period starts  00:00:00 UTC on Sunday,   March 29th, 2009
 Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, April 11th, 2009

This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting questions contact secret...@debian.org.

The details of the candidate platforms can be found at:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2009/platforms/

HOW TO VOTE

First, read the full text of the platforms and rebuttals.

Do not erase anything between the lines below and do not change the
choice names.

In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1. Place a 2 in
the brackets next to your next choice. Continue till you reach your
last choice. Do not enter a number smaller than 1 or larger than 3.
You may skip numbers.  You may rank options equally (as long as all
choices X you make fall in the range 1 <= X <= 3).

Please read the platforms in detail.

To vote "no, no matter what" rank "None Of The Above" as more
desirable than the unacceptable choices, or you may rank the "None Of
The Above" choice, and leave choices you consider unacceptable
blank. Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
choices, and ranked below all ranked choices. (Note: if the None Of
The Above choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other unranked
choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the None Of
The Above choice by the voting software).

Then mail the ballot to: leader2...@vote.debian.org.
Don't worry about spacing of the columns or any quote characters (">")
that your reply inserts. NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP
signed) with your key that is in the Debian keyring.  You may, if you
wish, choose to send a signed, encrypted ballot. Devotee accepts mail
that either contains only an unmangled OpenPGP message (RFC 2440
compliant), or a PGP/MIME mail (RFC 3156 compliant).

- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
a9ccc78e-785a-4762-a24a-ca59fe9b2dfe
[   ] Choice 1: Stefano Zacchiroli
[   ] Choice 2: Steve McIntyre
[   ] Choice 3: None Of The Above
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

--

The responses to a valid vote shall be signed by the vote key created
for this vote. The public key for the vote, signed by the Project
secretary, is appended below.

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=CFD2
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-


Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: state of the DSA nation

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:

> = osuosl =
> 
> rietz' storage subsystem is really weird.  It seems to hang for seconds
> to minutes at times.  Maybe rietz is really really overloaded or the
> hardware is not well.
> 
> rietz currently is bugs-master and syncproxy.na.
> 
> I suggest we move bugs-master to a kvm domain on dijkstra (don said
> that'd be fine).
> 
> Once that happened we can re-setup it with amd64 userland, and then
> re-setup syncproxy.na.  Ganneff said that'd be ok with him, tho we might
> miss a mirrorpulse or two in the process.

It also still has women.debian.org.  It might make sense to move that to
widor, which is where wiki moved to.  Need to find out who is
responsible for women.d.o.


-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: state of the DSA nation

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Frans Pop wrote:

> On Saturday 28 March 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > [note to -project readers:  this mail was written with -admin as an
> >  intended audience in mind and not you, but I figured I'd CC you
> >  anyways.  Please excuse the style and terseness of some items.]
> 
> Thanks! It's nice to have some sort of idea what's going on.
> 
> Question: what about gluck? IIRC there's still some things (lintian.d.o 
> for example) living on that.

Yup.  it is also www (when www isn't klecker), and cvs (webwml probably
is the only thing left), and MX for admin (I think that only does a
couple of expanders for commits tho) and has some admin related docs
(those which aren't in our dsa-passwords git or on the dsa.debian.org
wiki), and according to dns also ddtp (not sure what its status is), and
planet, and popcon, and search.

I currently don't see any pressing needs to change any of that (tho we
will probably want to move the admin related docs away from it slowly -
no need to have stuff spread out over 3 different places).

weasel
-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: state of the DSA nation

2009-03-28 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 28 March 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> [note to -project readers:  this mail was written with -admin as an
>  intended audience in mind and not you, but I figured I'd CC you
>  anyways.  Please excuse the style and terseness of some items.]

Thanks! It's nice to have some sort of idea what's going on.

Question: what about gluck? IIRC there's still some things (lintian.d.o 
for example) living on that.

Cheers,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wish list regarding install

2009-03-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 07:29:02AM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
> I tried executing grub, grub-install, etc., and got "command not found"
> errors.  Must be hid pretty good!  ;-)  Thanks!

Use the installer's built-in rescue mode as Frans said, and then go
through the menu system rather than switching to a shell; once you've
selected a filesystem to operate on, it has a menu item to reinstall
grub.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@debian.org]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote:

> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains
> 
> Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it
> was replaced with the wiki page for "privacy reasons".

The list of .net entries is not publicly available - the ldap only gives
it out to debian.org hosts, and the zone should not be AXFR-able either.

So some folks might have expected their entries to be private.

At any rate, dumping privileged ldap information and making it publicly
available is not acceptable.

If we decide this information should be public, then that's a different
thing.  But it should then be reflected in the slapd ACLs, and people
should be informed about the change.
-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



state of the DSA nation

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
[note to -project readers:  this mail was written with -admin as an
 intended audience in mind and not you, but I figured I'd CC you
 anyways.  Please excuse the style and terseness of some items.]


Hi,

just a short[post scriptum, a few hours later: hah.] overview of our
state/todo list/plans as I see it.  Feel free to comment/argue/etc.


= vancouver =

We got a nice msa2ki storage from HP at UBC/ECE.  Currently it's
resyncing/growing its raid because I want to see how it handles stuff.
Once this is done we can start moving stuff onto kvm domains on
dijkstra - the blade we also got.

Things I want to put there as a start:
- an i386 or amd64 buildd or both, depending on what wbadm
  needs.
- move buildd/wannabuild from raff to a domain so we rely
  less on FtC and old servers that are long out of warranty.


Luca also managed to get a system with lots of storage (on the order of
10 to 20t) from one of the Professors at UBC.  Unfortunately the system
itself is too old to have modern CPUs that do virtualisation stuff, and
it "only" has 6 or so gigs of ram.

We can use this for either backups (if we want to do more than what
bartok currently has), or - I'd prefer that - we ask Noel Koethe and
Paul Wise if they still want to do their sources.d.o and merge.d.o
services (see http://dsa.debian.org/hardware-wishlist/).  The system can
also be home for data.d.o and snapshot.d.o if the other things don't
work out.


= darmstadt =

Unger, the dl360 in darmstadt, germany, has two raid controllers.
Currently the disks are on the p400 controller which does not have a
battery backed cache.  We should move the disks to the p800 (see
RT#1129).  Once that is done we should move db.debian.org (i.e. our
ldap) onto a kvm domain on unger. unger already has one trusted system,
handel, our puppet master.

liszt is still on etch.  The upgrade ticket is owned by zobel who is
also listmaster, so that makes sense.


= helsinki =

On piatti the piuparts team got piuparts running again.  That means that
piatti now is quite loaded.

Piatti hosts udd, and it has bugs and packages mirrors tho I removed
them both from dns because piatti's load spiked into the hundreds.

Moving non-piuparts stuff of piatti and thereby dedicating piatti solely
to piuparts again is also preferable because piuparts does lots of stuff
as root, and so do its admins.


= ftc =

nagios from samosa should probably move to spohr, which appears to be
our "public dsa services that are not all that security critical"-box
these days.

That'll leave samosa free.  Once buildd is in vancouver, raff only has
keyring left, but that should be easy to move; and raff still has morgue
files from ftp-master, they can be moved elsewhere also.

So we could move udd from piatti to its own dedicated host (either raff
or samosa) - see #1241.  DDE can move onto the same host, away from
merkel, if desired by dde-adm.


= csail/mit =

Noahm at CSAIL/MIT still has 3 of the old HP servers we got two months
ago in his to-setup queue (they are from the same batch as the dl360
that is schein, now hosted at ISC and being security.us).

IIRC we will have two dl360 (senfl and rore) and one dl380 (carver).
Disk-wise I don't know/remember how they will be.  Probably at least 74g
(2x74g raid1) in the dl360s, and 180g (6x36g raid5) in the dl380.

Once they are online we should think of moving individual services
around.


= munich =

verdi is a really really old box: dual pentium III 700mhz, 512mb of ram,
raid5 of 4 18g disks one of which failed half a year ago and hasn't been
replaced yet.  verdi hosts volatile-master.

volatile should maybe be integrated into the ftp archive proper - I sent
an email regarding that a few months back to the volatile folks.  If
that does not happen we need to move it to a new host, then we can
decommission verdi.


= karlsruhe =

wieck and schumann - dell servers from november or so - are sponsored by
1&1.  wieck is acting as a security mirror for a while now.

schumann has been made into a kvm host and is currently hosting one
domain: chopin.  chopin will become new security-master (currently
klecker) once the ftp folks are done setting stuff up.

we can setup another kvm domain on it (we have 2 more ip addresses) for
other security stuff.  fw mentioned a couple of months back that he
wants a place for security-tracker.d.n.  This could be it.  white
(steffen joeris) also wants a home for testing-security.d.n.  They can
probably live on the same kvm domain.


= minnesota =

saens isn't doing anything since we moved ftp.d.o to kassia.  We were
talking about making it a mail relay at one point, but it doesn't look
like there'll be any progress there any time soon, nor is it still
certain we want/need that.

maybe make seans part of security.us?


= nl =

Once security-master is on chopin, the only thing left on klecker will
be www-master (and www).

We do not have ilo access to klecker, tho if we had a piece of useful
(rackable) hardwa

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli  wrote:

> (A reasonable exception could be www.debian.net containing a list of 
> .debian.net names.)

There is a wiki page for that:

http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains

Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it
was replaced with the wiki page for "privacy reasons".

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.

AOL.

Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org,
$X.debian.net should point to $X.debian.org. (A reasonable exception
could be www.debian.net containing a list of .debian.net names.)

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev  wrote:
> > > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting
> > > or maintaining stuff there at some point, but for the present it is
> > > a bit easier for me to keep it all in a single repo :)
> 
> > I think you mean backports.org, backports.debian.net is not what you
> > think it is. Despite its name, backports.d.n is a personal backports
> > archive for Daniel Bauman.
> 
> I really don’t get why it’s appropriate for a developer to use such
> generic names for their personal stuff. git.debian.net seems to be
> Daniel’s too.
> 
> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.

I'd go a little further and instate a general rule such as:
- All subdomains of debian.org should exist in debian.net and point to
  the same location.
- All domains external to debian.org but providing official support
  should also be accessible from a subdomain of debian.org.
- All external domains providing unofficial support should also be
  accessible from a subdomain of debian.net.

That would also be the occasion to discuss about the status of
backports, buildd.net and others.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:

> > I think you mean backports.org, backports.debian.net is not what you
> > think it is. Despite its name, backports.d.n is a personal backports
> > archive for Daniel Bauman.
> 
> I really don't get why it's appropriate for a developer to use such
> generic names for their personal stuff. git.debian.net seems to be
> Daniel's too.
> 
> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> project-wide efforts? I'd appreciate opinions on the matter.

I couldn't agree more.

-- 
   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  Peter Palfrader  | : :' :  The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
   |   `-http://www.debian.org/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]:

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev  wrote:
> > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting
> > or maintaining stuff there at some point, but for the present it is
> > a bit easier for me to keep it all in a single repo :)

> I think you mean backports.org, backports.debian.net is not what you
> think it is. Despite its name, backports.d.n is a personal backports
> archive for Daniel Bauman.

I really don’t get why it’s appropriate for a developer to use such
generic names for their personal stuff. git.debian.net seems to be
Daniel’s too.

Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.

Cheers,

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org