Re: I'm resigning as Release Manager

2010-03-15 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Luk,

On Sonntag, 14. März 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
 It's time to stop thinking I would be able to keep working as Release
 Manager in this climate, I hereby resign as Release Manager.

Thank you a lot for your awesome work as a release manager! 

I'm sad to see (you resign like) this and hope to see you back eventually. Be 
happy in any case!


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:14:45PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
 We are in an election period and I would like for the project
 to elect a DPL who not only does not support a certain level
 of non-transparency, but is actively intolerant of it.

 I do not know whether or not we have any potential candidates
 who fit that bill yet.

To that end, it would be nice to have a specific question posed on
-vote: that venue is IMHO more appropriate to answer your question than
-project. (Or just prod the candidates to follow-up there if the above
is already the complete question.)

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Clint Adams
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:09:43PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 To that end, it would be nice to have a specific question posed on
 -vote: that venue is IMHO more appropriate to answer your question than
 -project. (Or just prod the candidates to follow-up there if the above
 is already the complete question.)

I plan to ask many specific questions on -vote with regard to
transparency and decentralization of power, and I will definitely
try to have them formulated before the end of the week.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315154238.ga25...@scru.org



Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

2010-03-15 Thread Angus Hedger
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:20 PM, The Hickeys hick...@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:

 How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free distribution 
 list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is this because Debian 
 does not adhere to the GNU/Linux Free Software Definition?

 Thanks,
 Greg H.

Hey,

See here: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/common-distros.html

Quote:

Debian

Debian's Social Contract does say that all software in the main
distribution will be free software. Unfortunately, that's not always
true in practice. Debian has repeatedly made tacit or explicit
exceptions for specific pieces of nonfree software, such as the blobs
included in or accompanying Linux. We're still hopeful that there
won't be such exceptions in the future, but we can't turn a blind eye
to the situation as it stands today.

Debian also provides a repository of nonfree software. According to
the project, this software is “not part of the Debian system.” We
understand that's important for organizational reasons, but users
would be hard-pressed to make a distinction. The nonfree repositories
are often featured as prominently as the main ones throughout Debian's
web site, documentation, and other materials.

Regards,

Angus.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/996de46c1003140857g32d73bcew6d87968264a91...@mail.gmail.com



If you have a hardwood floor, times have changed.

2010-03-15 Thread Mike Hammond







Happy New Years!
www.FloorGuardian.com   
January 2010
�

 We protect your floors while the others just cover it!   We offer floor 
protection.� You have invested serious money in your gym floors and we offer 
serious protection.� We protect your floor for the damage that tables, chairs 
and heels can inflict.� Installs in about an hour for my gyms.� Come in 9 
colors but we can also Pantone match if needed.� Not one of those tacky tarp 
systems, Floor Guardian is a velcro'd seamed, carpet based, 6' wide roll 
product that is easily rolled and carted under all doorways and stored on end.� 
No lifting as with tiles, and none of the tape waste or trip hazards of a tarp 
and way more elegant in looks.� As an example a� 70'x96' gym would have 16 
rolls and the storage would be 32x108 of floor space. 
�We also will take your tarp system as a trade in- We clean 
them and then donate them to your choice of� a Boys and Girls Club.�
Turn your Gym or Hall into more than just an athletic 
space, use it for receptions, rehearsals, recitals, graduations, PTA meetings, 
fund raisers and registrations. Reduce the need to refinish, while warming and 
quieting down the room.� Have recess insides on rainy days!� Kids love it.� 7 
year full warranty. So tough, you can clean it with regular bleach.� Hundreds 
of schools for the past 20 years have been protecting their floors using Floor 
Guardian without 1 complaint.� We have the referrals to back it up.� Click here 
for a free sample and brochure. � Please visit our website or call for more 
info. 






web - www.FloorGuardian.com ��|�� Product Sample - Free 
Sample� |�� tel - 206-255-1491 





Message sent by: Floor Guardian, 4841 California Ave SW, Seattle,  98166-4329, 
United States

To unsubscribe, click the link below.
http://b.ss36.on9mail.com/RWCode/subscribe.asp?SID=0SiteID=43865email=debian-proj...@lists.debian.orgHitID=1268672224201

Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Mar 15 05:16, Clint Adams wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/03/msg00011.html
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/05/msg00080.html
  
  So it wasn't that secret after all.  (Note that all this happened last
  year, including Luk's tweet.)
 
 I apologize for missing these two URLs.  Was there other information
 communicated through proper channels or can we agree that the only
 parts of this that lacked transparency were the selection of
 time, manner, place, attendees, and proposed agenda; who actually
 attended; what actually was discussed; and possible aftermath which
 may have resulted from these discussions?

I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be informed about
a meeting of a team you are not a part of?

Matt

-- 
Matthew Johnson


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Clint Adams
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:18:54PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
 I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be informed 
 about
 a meeting of a team you are not a part of?

I'm confused as to why multiple DDs don't seem to understand
what transparency means.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315204721.ga16...@scru.org



Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Matthew Johnson wrote:
 I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be
 informed about a meeting of a team you are not a part of?

If a team is meeting, the meeting and agenda should be announced, and
the decisions and discussions which occur in the meeting should be
made as public and available as possible, as soon as possible. It
doesn't have to be perfect, and it doesn't need to be pretty, but
meetings without announcements and notes should be avoided as much as
possible in Debian.

You shouldn't have to be part of a team to find out what a team in
Debian is doing.


Don Armstrong

-- 
After the first battle of Sto Lat, I formulated a policy which has
stood me in good stead in other battles. It is this: if an enemy has
an impregnable stronghold, see he stays there.
 -- Terry Pratchett _Jingo_ p265

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315212451.gx4...@teltox.donarmstrong.com



Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:24:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
 On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Matthew Johnson wrote:
  I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be
  informed about a meeting of a team you are not a part of?
 
 If a team is meeting, the meeting and agenda should be announced, and
 the decisions and discussions which occur in the meeting should be
 made as public and available as possible, as soon as possible. It
 doesn't have to be perfect, and it doesn't need to be pretty, but
 meetings without announcements and notes should be avoided as much as
 possible in Debian.

And by all means: The first opportunity to learn about a team's
decision MUST NOT be a press release.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315223216.ga32...@torres.zugschlus.de



vmlinuz / vmlinuz.old

2010-03-15 Thread dr.broonskii

/*To whom it may concern , good morning !
Most likely you  have never come across the Hausordnung of a regular  
railway  station.Should you  ever  want to  see  a similar kind of  
administrational  accomplishment,you only have to look at your own
regulations in particular or ubuntu-regulations in general. - Everything 
is very well regulated - even questioning,e.g. if someone wants to ask a 
question,one is  expected to check a zillion of contributions ,to find 
out,if this very question has not been asked ,hence,answered  before. - 
Congratulations - This is brilliant,however,I am afraid,that by the 
time,I have made it through _all_ contributions,my hair will have grown 
white  or I will have forgotten  my name,if not my question,too.
But - since I was born to decent parents,I have also inherited some of 
their decency.And in order for you to realize this personal quality of 
mine I hereby want to ask you as humble as I can be :  to whom could I 
direct a question,which refers to vmlinuz/vmlinuz.old ?

With regards - and thanks for your attention - DR. BROONSKII .

*/


Re: Invite to join the Release Team

2010-03-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:14:45PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
  That meeting took place in May of last year. What's the point of discussing 
  it almost 9 months later? What exactly triggered your blog post?
 
 We are in an election period and I would like for the project
 to elect a DPL who not only does not support a certain level
 of non-transparency, but is actively intolerant of it.

If you have such questions, it's usually easiest for everyone involved
if you bring them up on -vote, the relevant forum for this kind of
thing.

Anyway, since you ask (cc to -vote added),

I believe it is nobody's business where anyone heads off to if they pay
for it all by themselves. If a group of Debian people decides to meet up
in a pub in Cambridge, that's their prerogative. If the members of that
group just happen to coincide with the members of a particular team
within Debian, that does not change the situation, nor would it if they
discuss matters related to what the team does in Debian; and if those
discussions result in any kind of decision that is their responsibility
to take, I still don't see any problem. Whether we talk about the
release team consisting of people from all over the world, or the debian
ocaml team consisting of mostly people from France (with the occasional
Italian guy -- hey Zack!) is irrelevant in that part, IMO.

Of course it is desirable for the team to communicate any decisions
through the proper channels, whenever and wherever they could be
relevant to other people; this may involve a debian-devel-announce post,
or, say, in case of something relevant to porters, a mail to the
debian-ports alias. The team should also be careful to talk to relevant
other people *before* making a definite decision if it could reasonably
be expected that such input from outside the team could bring up
important information.

But all this is no different to any other form of communication. As long
as a team does not actively refuse cooperation from people outside their
team, it should be totally their decision whether they want to use
mailinglists, private mails, IRC channels, blog posts, instant
messaging, or real-life meetings as their preferred method of
communication.

Of course, if the team does ask for (and receives) Debian money, then
some level of reporting after the fact should be mandatory, to make sure
that the DPL and the project as a whole can decide whether the money has
been well spent. It should also be made reasonably clear how interested
parties can join the team. But beyond that, I do not believe that any
requirements should be made on how people decide what their preferred
method of communication is.

 I do not know whether or not we have any potential candidates
 who fit that bill yet.

Hope this helps,

-- 
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is
trying to fool the system.
  http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: vmlinuz / vmlinuz.old

2010-03-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hallo Doktor,

Ich würde sagen, erst mal die debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org


Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant



Am 2010-03-16 01:21:44, schrieb dr.broonskii:
 /*To whom it may concern , good morning !
 Most likely you  have never come across the Hausordnung of a
 regular  railway  station.Should you  ever  want to  see  a similar
 kind of  administrational  accomplishment,you only have to look at
 your own
 regulations in particular or ubuntu-regulations in general. -
 Everything is very well regulated - even questioning,e.g. if someone
 wants to ask a question,one is  expected to check a zillion of
 contributions ,to find out,if this very question has not been asked
 ,hence,answered  before. - Congratulations - This is
 brilliant,however,I am afraid,that by the time,I have made it
 through _all_ contributions,my hair will have grown white  or I will
 have forgotten  my name,if not my question,too.
 But - since I was born to decent parents,I have also inherited some
 of their decency.And in order for you to realize this personal
 quality of mine I hereby want to ask you as humble as I can be :  to
 whom could I direct a question,which refers to
 vmlinuz/vmlinuz.old ?
 With regards - and thanks for your attention - DR. BROONSKII .
 
 */
 END OF REPLIED MESSAGE 



-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
http://www.tamay-dogan.net/ Michelle Konzack
http://www.can4linux.org/   Apt. 917
http://www.flexray4linux.org/   50, rue de Soultz
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de   67100 Strabourg/France
IRC#Debian (irc.icq.com)  Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ#328449886 Tel. FR: +33  6  61925193


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature