Re: ECCN classifivation
Hi, On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 06:56:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at writes: On Mi, 16 Jun 2010, Berthelot, Brian wrote: Please provide the ECCN and CCATS number for you Debian GNU Linux This is FAQ which Debian can not give you an answer. But pointers and information for what you need to do are described here. http://wiki.debian.org/USExportControl Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100627081614.ga18...@debian.org
FSCONS call for participation
Hi! FSCONS [0] is a conference with focus on free society and free software. It takes place in Gothenburg, Sweden 5-7 November 2010. I have participated since the start and given talks about Debian and held devrooms etc. In connection with FSCONS I have been trying to whip up a Debian Nordic group, with varying result. I would be very happy to expand the Debian presence at this increasingly important conference in the nordic region. More information and Call for Participation is at [1]. Call for participation deadline is now, 30 June 2010, but AFAIK it is still possible to submit participation. Also, just attending the conference is very nice and is a great meeting place. [0] http://fscons.org/ [1] http://fscons.org/cfp Best regards, Per Andersson avtobiff at gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktint9e_cg-go0swp5yckkictqb2pgng5ri8w_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian-private declassification team (looking for one)
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:34:36AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote [edited]: On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:46:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: I would welcome a new GR to rescind the previous one and revert d-private to what it's always been: private. I would second a proposal for such a GR. If even those who argued in favour of the declassification process at that time are not sufficiently motivated to invest now some work in this then this proves to me that the whole thing is nonsense, and that we should get rid of it. There's a compromise: revise the declassification rules to help automation. Writing a perl script to filter msgs based on threading and well-defined declassification headers shouldn't be that much of work. -- debtags-organised WNPP bugs: http://members.hellug.gr/serzan/wnpp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100627211151.ga2...@mobee
