CD Vendor submition
Dear sirs, I have applied to become a cd/dvd vendor but still no sign of communication. Can you tell me why? Thank you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim1iinbytvdcdecvqtcpq_nfoycauxpsex7w...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian-private declassification team (looking for one)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:51:21PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: The very first message may be private (or partially so), but the main part of the discussion usually isn't, and certainly the OT leaves of the discussion aren't. [In past four big threads we were 2/4 of starting messages being appropriate for -private...] How about rejecting all mails with Re: or [OT] in the Subject? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100701165000.ga11...@scru.org
Conflicts between Developers: Let others mediate
If you ever find yourself in a situtation where you are in conflict with another developer, and you're unable to make headway, please rely on others to mediate. You can contact the DPL (lea...@debian.org) or the CTTE (for technical matters) or even myself or any other Developer you trust. Don Armstrong -- Democracy is more dangerous than fire. Fire can't vote itself immune to water. -- Michael Z. Williamson http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100701182342.gw27...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
Re: debian-private declassification team (looking for one)
On 06/27/2010 11:11 PM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:34:36AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote [edited]: On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:46:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: I would welcome a new GR to rescind the previous one and revert d-private to what it's always been: private. I would second a proposal for such a GR. If even those who argued in favour of the declassification process at that time are not sufficiently motivated to invest now some work in this then this proves to me that the whole thing is nonsense, and that we should get rid of it. There's a compromise: revise the declassification rules to help automation. Writing a perl script to filter msgs based on threading and well-defined declassification headers shouldn't be that much of work. Ack, but that is only something which could be used in the future. I wouldn't mind to add something like X-Declassify-after: 3y header to my mails to -private. Based on threading it is hard to decide is something should be declassified as in some threads only a few mails include sensitive content, like citations of other persons which are supposed to stay private forever. Also I think some people expressed their wish that *all* of their mails should stay private forever (I'd have to search the archive for that, but I think that came up when it was tried to form a declassification team some long time ago), so the first thing to do would be to look trough the archive for such mails and ensure that their wish is being followed. Especially for retired DDs (even worse when they retired before that declassification theme came up) it should be checked very carefully if their mails should be (probably against their wish) being published. And finally I think we should release Squeeze first before doing any work on this, a (good) release is much more important than bringing the muddy fights of debian-private to the public. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c2ce21b.9020...@bzed.de
Re: Conflicts between Developers: Let others mediate
Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 11:23 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit : If you ever find yourself in a situtation where you are in conflict with another developer, and you're unable to make headway, please rely on others to mediate. You can contact the DPL (lea...@debian.org) or the CTTE (for technical matters) or even myself or any other Developer you trust. Yeah sure. We have such good examples of successful mediations within the project in the past. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1278021603.2777.4.ca...@tomoe
