Re: DEP-5 (copyright file format) ... gap with practice

2014-09-15 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hi,

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:48:22AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:40:46PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
  Not sure how that's a lot of work since uscan does all the magic for
  you.  
 I don't use uscan to download tarballs for packages I maintain. Not to
 mention time required to fill in the Files-Excluded field.

Just for the sake of interest:  Is there any reason not to use uscan?
(I hope the answer will not be since I need to remove files from
upstream source.)

Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140915145119.ge6...@an3as.eu

Re: DEP-5 (copyright file format) ... gap with practice

2014-09-15 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:51:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
   Not sure how that's a lot of work since uscan does all the magic for
   you.  
  I don't use uscan to download tarballs for packages I maintain. Not to
  mention time required to fill in the Files-Excluded field.
 Just for the sake of interest:  Is there any reason not to use uscan?
For upstreams not using git I already have the new tarball downloaded
before I start working on it. uscan just doesn't have a place in my
workflows, it is necessary only when working on random packages from other
people.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature