Processed: Re: Bug#989254: project: Maintainer email of package `pmount` seems wrong.
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:pmount Bug #989254 [project] project: Maintainer email of package `pmount` seems wrong. Bug reassigned from package 'project' to 'src:pmount'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #989254 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #989254 to the same values previously set > reassign 989251 src:pmount 0.9.23-3 Bug #989251 [pmount] pmount: Manpage lists maintainer with email address that is not reachable. Bug reassigned from package 'pmount' to 'src:pmount'. No longer marked as found in versions pmount/0.9.23-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #989251 to the same values previously set Bug #989251 [src:pmount] pmount: Manpage lists maintainer with email address that is not reachable. Marked as found in versions pmount/0.9.23-3. > forcemerge 989251 -1 Bug #989251 [src:pmount] pmount: Manpage lists maintainer with email address that is not reachable. Bug #989254 [src:pmount] project: Maintainer email of package `pmount` seems wrong. Marked as found in versions pmount/0.9.23-3. Merged 989251 989254 > tag 989251 -a11y Bug #989251 [src:pmount] pmount: Manpage lists maintainer with email address that is not reachable. Bug #989254 [src:pmount] project: Maintainer email of package `pmount` seems wrong. Removed tag(s) a11y. Removed tag(s) a11y. -- 989251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989251 989254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989254 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#966371: marked as done (project: Higher version for uploads to stable and oldstable distributions)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:28:25 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: project: Higher version for uploads to stable and
oldstable distributions
has caused the Debian Bug report #966371,
regarding project: Higher version for uploads to stable and oldstable
distributions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
966371: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966371
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: project
Severity: wishlist
For those who care about Debian derivatives:
A derivative may be deployed as an overlay rather than a full archive.
Modifications from the derivative live together with originals from
Debian, but modifications must have a higher version.
Full archives use this approach to increase the version:
1-1 → 1-1foo1
This does not work with overlays because of binNMUs:
1-1+b1 > 1-1foo1
1-1+b1 > 1-1foo1+b1
A binNMU may be unnecessary in the derivative. Also, these versions are
disruptive:
1-1+b1foo1
1-1+b1foo1+b1
Thus, overlays should use this approach:
1-1 → 1-1.0foo1
However, regular uploads to stable and oldstable distributions may use
the same signalization ("+") as binNMUs, so:
1-1+deb1u1 < 1-1.0foo1
Therefore, please use a higher version for these uploads, such as:
1-1 → 1-1.0+deb1u1
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
the "project" pseudo-package is intended for "Problems related to
project administration". Discussion version schemes seems to not fit
that category, so I'll close the report.
If the submitter wasn't banned from Debian lists, I would recommend to
discuss on debian-devel@.
Ansgar--- End Message ---
Processed: reassign 929516 to mirrors
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 929516 mirrors Bug #929516 [project] [project] Please provide onion services using next-gen (v3) onion addresses Bug reassigned from package 'project' to 'mirrors'. No longer marked as found in versions current. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #929516 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 929516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929516 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reassign 894768 to general
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 894768 general Bug #894768 [project] project: in debian 9, using mate, had crashes during the execution of videos in vlc. I have a core2duo Bug reassigned from package 'project' to 'general'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #894768 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #894768 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 894768: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894768 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#806287: marked as done (project: Hello! I tried to use Debian with gnome.. Looks cool, works poop... Package-Activity does not allow to install FIREFOX. I can't even SORT list of packages)
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:52:52 +0200 with message-id <575ac634.3050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: project: Hello! I tried to use Debian with gnome.. Looks cool, works poop... Package-Activity does not allow to install FIREFOX. I can't even SORT list of packages has caused the Debian Bug report #806287, regarding project: Hello! I tried to use Debian with gnome.. Looks cool, works poop... Package-Activity does not allow to install FIREFOX. I can't even SORT list of packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 806287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806287 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: project Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? -> The Packages-Activity * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? -> I tried to install firefox not from console. * What was the outcome of this action? ->I feel like nobody loves me. * What outcome did you expect instead? -> At least, I want to sort packages in list. And I still couldn't find Mozilla Firefox or Chromium in the list... PS: I've written this message in mcedit, cause you didn't include some packages to base disk, so I could not write reports in GUI. Hell, today is 2015!! I like console, but I have installed the GUI!!! *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-586 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 User redirected to the users support channels, closing this bug. - -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJXWsYtAAoJEEw4Yb3McGt00DUMAJoWtUrKVFdOdHqmFVt2HABG 2hQyjVD++0Qj2d1RS16JY3+6x1KPBH+s2OoDQvFbR0iD5JuF5j2PI/k5kqHukV2z ethmja8LF/w60y2V+QSWQlKT+DQTcSKFzgBY5dEumOQcdgVN7jj/An6RWbl+oPpK KJVsEsmTwGGjknsZXK4fN6wNdB5e+ARgh7KD7CjVrQystC8PKwM3nnDpg8lwlCpP iYapp3Sqd0Xe2Iu3JWNbz8UFAh/hTiBqrFkd6YGiblgeYFVCPT28SknVpfyj+PjK LJymas18ddTUTGtcx3SVz35Fdor4LGdBA3yOAxDPeJgOHtllvjRpqjzrSp6gzPxA CMZvX9euPeUwGkH+k3rSlOGOOOm+6+m1NG8ht+zIHKF5HN48ty5BPMgmuj2McQVw ul0IbdMoOgvcKZvGk7GxRC62eQCXx4ju9sQ5cvEN+Lgw7hKSiA184SldM4b0YNsP UlGanW4DElPh7AfJH9ShbLq223g5JCHSs6MWugCaBw== =Rhqr -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#685795: Info received (Technical Committee proposes Keith Packard to fill vacant TC seat)
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Technical Committee debian-c...@lists.debian.org If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 685...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- 685795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685795 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.685795.b685795.138572505820065.acki...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: soap_use_proxy problem still exists with apt-listbugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 399706
Bug #399706 {Done: akira yamada ak...@debian.org} [project] soap4r should not
request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized
Bug #396304 {Done: akira yamada ak...@debian.org} [project] soap4r should not
request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized
Unarchived Bug 399706
Unarchived Bug 396304
reassign 399706 apt-listbugs 0.1.3
Bug #399706 {Done: akira yamada ak...@debian.org} [project] soap4r should not
request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized
Bug #396304 {Done: akira yamada ak...@debian.org} [project] soap4r should not
request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized
Bug reassigned from package 'project' to 'apt-listbugs'.
Bug reassigned from package 'project' to 'apt-listbugs'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #399706 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #396304 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #399706 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #396304 to the same values
previously set
Bug #399706 {Done: akira yamada ak...@debian.org} [apt-listbugs] soap4r
should not request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized
Bug #396304 {Done: akira yamada ak...@debian.org} [apt-listbugs] soap4r
should not request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized
Marked as found in versions apt-listbugs/0.1.3.
Marked as found in versions apt-listbugs/0.1.3.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
396304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=396304
399706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399706
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133566920928182.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#609491: marked as done (project: Nameserver or DNS)
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jan 2011 22:10:31 + with message-id 20110109221031.ga4...@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#609491: project: Nameserver or DNS has caused the Debian Bug report #609491, regarding project: Nameserver or DNS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Severity: important I'm working with computers since 1990. I'm no expert. I'm working with Debian about 5 years. My computer gets the ip-address from the router (dhcp). He gets the address of the nameserver from the router too. The ip-address of the nameserver is 192.168.0.1. The file /etc/resolv.conf got the line nameserver 192.168.0.1. The nameserver of my provider is slow. So I got an account on dyndns.com and use their DNS. If I put the address of the nameserver from dyndns.com into the file resolv.conf (nameserver 216.146.35.35) there will be every second and more a request to the nameserver (using the command netstat -anp). If I put the old address 192.168.0.1 back into the file resolv.conf requests to the nameserver went normal, means: requests will be done if a program really needs a new address for e.g. blaaa.blaa.bla. I got the same behaviour if I put the address of the nameserver from my provider into resolv.conf 212.95.97.111. I guess this is really strange. I did never saw so much queries to a nameserver on my computer. Hope, somebody will help! Greetings. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:13:51PM +0100, eis wrote: Package: project Severity: important please ask your question on the user support list, debian-u...@lists.debian.org. If you can determine that there's a specific problem in a particular package, you can file a bug against that package. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: cleanup
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 292481 Bug#292481: Collaborative repository of package meta-information is needed 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Artur Górniak j...@grey.debian.pl reassign 512717 general Bug#512717: project: Should have alternatives for graphical su and sudo (x-su, x-sudo?) Bug reassigned from package `project' to `general'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#292481: new parameter in deb packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 292481 Collaborative repository of package meta-information is needed Bug#292481: Add new Screenshot field Changed Bug title to `Collaborative repository of package meta-information is needed' from `Add new Screenshot field'. reassign 292481 project Bug#292481: Collaborative repository of package meta-information is needed Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `project'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 484024 sugar Bug#484024: sugar init problem Warning: Unknown package '-' Warning: Unknown package 'window' Warning: Unknown package 'manager' Warning: Unknown package 'from' Warning: Unknown package 'olpc' Bug reassigned from package `sugar - window manager from the olpc project' to `sugar'. severity 484024 grave Bug#484024: sugar init problem Severity set to `grave' from `normal' severity 484086 grave Bug#484086: sugar-emulator doesnt work at all Severity set to `grave' from `important' merge 484086 484024 Bug#484024: sugar init problem Bug#484086: sugar-emulator doesnt work at all Merged 484024 484086. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484009: Info received (Bug#484009: Policy wrt to removal of packages which are part of a task)
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Release Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before. Please do not send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- 484009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: closing 31581
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20 close 31581 Bug#31581: project: Time between releases is too long 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 344126 to gnome
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20 reassign 344126 gnome Bug#344126: Configuration tool on the GNOME desktop Bug reassigned from package `project' to `gnome'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#31581: marked as done (project: Time between releases is too long)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:14:17 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#31581: project: Time between releases is too long has caused the Debian Bug report #31581, regarding project: Time between releases is too long to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 31581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=31581 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Version: N/A I've seen recently at slashdot complaints about the slow release cycle that Debian has. The Debian model is based on three stages: unstable, frozen and stable. However, the freezing process takes too long. For example, since autoconf 2.13 has been recently released, it will take another full year until it gets on frozen, and then another year and a half until it gets on stable - and the whole process is delayed because of some easily broken packages - like xfree86 (that seems to break once every two releases). This make packages with unimportant but neat bugfixes and new features be released slowly - thus making Debian lose its technical superiority when compared with some other distributions that release buggy packages but release often. The right way to avoid this bug of the Debian release system without losing its features would be to break the 'glue' between the core packages (essential, base, perl and anything that would confuse the whole system if broken) and the non-core packages (everything that is useful or useless but will not break the system if makes a mess). Then _each package_ would have its own unstable and stable versions. After a new version of each package is packaged, it would be put in the 'unstable' version. Then, _after it is tested with the other stable packages_ and after people say it's working (testing it with the possibly-broken unstable packages would also be good but if it's not the packages' fault incompatibilities are not an issue here), it will be considered 'stable' (and moved to the 'frozen' dist). The 'core' packages are more problematic. They should be tested as a whole, and should have the three phases: unstable, frozen and stable. In the 'frozen' state, no features should be added; in the non-core packages, this is a responsability of the upstream maintainers (if they like it that way), but in a 'core' package a 'feature freeze' is useful to avoid lossage. And finally, we need a (totally unreleated to the above) CD stage. It is more like the current setup, and should be done the following way: CD-ROM corepackages stable stable stable frozen frozen (for testing)stable unstablefrozen (nobody is too crazy)unstable This proposal may seem too risky (since there is less testing before the 'stable' state), but consider what we face today (in the main dist): - An outdated stable - A frozen with some packages that are quite stable and some badly broken because of some misdone bug fix; - An unstable with some packages that should be on stable (since they fix some bad bugs of those 2-year-old packages) and some totally screwed packages that need more testing. A user then faces a dillema: use the stable but outdated software or the more recent (and generally better) software mixed with totally broken packages? Some might consider using a mixed setup, but not only this is hard but has some sutble problems since the unstable packages are misdesigned to the 'unstable' dist, and even harder if you like dselect. We need to move from the present setup (too CD-based) to one based in multiple dists, using fully the potential power of the Internet. And with a faster development cycle (release early, release often), we can have even less bug and more cool features due to Linus's Law (read The Cathedral and the Bazaar). I know nobody is perfect, and I may have missed something. This is intendend to cause comment, discussion (and the ocasional flame war) and help to improve Debian (and beacause it's cool to install a new version of your favorite software knowing it will work ;-) ). -- System Information Debian Release: 2.0 Kernel Version: Linux cesarb1 2.0.34 #2 Thu Jul 9 10:57:48 EST 1998 i386 unknown ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1999-01-07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen recently at slashdot complaints about the slow release cycle
Processed: closing 69271
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 close 69271 Bug#69271: praise tracking system 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Joost Kooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#30340: marked as done (Draft new DFSG - r1.4)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:52:18 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#30340: Draft new DFSG - r1.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #30340, regarding Draft new DFSG - r1.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 30340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=30340 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Jason Gunthorpe writes (Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4): On Fri, 27 Nov 1998, Ian Jackson wrote: i. When distribution is made by public anonymous download, the licence restriction is satisfied if the source code is made available on the same site as the executable, at all times when the executable is available. We don't actually assure that. We have binary-only mirrors, binary-only CD's and we have binaries in the archive that do not have source for their exact versions. Then we are violating the GPL. In particular, a binary-only mirror cannot meet the letter of the GPL. If you want to dispute this, please do so on debian-legal. We must (ie, are legally required) do one of the following: (a) throw out all GPL'd software; (b) persuade RMS to remove the `from the same place' restriction in the GPL electronic distribution clause; (c) contact all copyright holders of all GPL'd software in our distribution to get permission from them. (d) stop having binary-only mirrors. Which do you think we should do ? Hint: only (d) is feasible in the short term. (b) might be feasible later. (a) and (c) are totally out of the question. I think we should do (d). With this message, I have filed a bug. Ian. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Re: Santiago Vila 1998-12-03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This would mean that we would have to keep the source in ftp.debian.org for three years. We do offer source indefinitely long on archive.debian.org. Is this more feasible than making all the binary mirrors to disappear? I'm not aware of any, let alone official ones. Closing this bug. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#159511: project: debian smtp servers should be able to support secure SMTP (SSL/TLS)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 159511 https://rt.debian.org//Ticket/Display.html?id=111 Bug#159511: project: debian smtp servers should be able to support secure SMTP (SSL/TLS) Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to https://rt.debian.org//Ticket/Display.html?id=111. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#155998: marked as done (project: .all.deb not installable on all architectures/dependency woody - unstable)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:03:19 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#155998: Please close when appropriate has caused the Debian Bug report #155998, regarding project: .all.deb not installable on all architectures/dependency woody - unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 155998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=155998 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-07 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search pingus pingus-data - Free Lemmings(tm) clone ixtyfor:~# apt-get install pingus-data Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: pingus-data: Depends: pingus but it is not installable E: Sorry, broken packages Manually downloading pingus-data .. sixtyfor:/scratch/incoming/TAPE/Save_Alpha/Game/debian# dpkg -i pingus-data_0.5.0pre3-1_all.deb (Reading database ... 129254 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace pingus-data 0.5.0pre3-1 (using pingus-data_0.5.0pre3-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement pingus-data ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pingus-data: pingus-data depends on pingus; however: Package pingus is not installed. dpkg: error processing pingus-data (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: pingus-data I think this bug is not (only) package specific but rather a general bug because an all-deb (with probably an pingus.xxx.i386.deb in woody ?) entered woody, while the corresponding package (pingus.xxx.alpha.deb) did not. Or it is an bug in apt, which should state that this all deb is currently not instalable on this particular architecture since the (binary dependent) dependencies are not (yet) fullfilled in the selected distribution. My sources.list # See sources.list(5) for more information, especially # Remember that you can only use http, ftp or file URIs # CDROMs are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free #deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free #deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free #deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free #deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free # Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work #deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free #deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US #deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian woody main contrib #deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free #deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free #deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux sixtyfor 2.4.17 #1 Mon Feb 25 21:41:29 CET 2002 alpha Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferredgpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This bug is still very much relevant. It affects woody (old-stable), sarge (stable), etch (testing) and even sid (unstable). The problem is that architecture independent packages are blindly included on all architectures. That's a design decision. Debian has arch-independent packages, and the fact that they are broken on some architectures is hence mostly unfixable. The example in the bug is: foobar-data (all) depends foobar (any), foobar is not available for this architecture. foo-data should usually not depend on foo, only the other way round
Bug#159511: marked as done (project: debian smtp servers should be able to support secure SMTP (SSL/TLS))
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:06:32 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#159511: project: debian smtp servers should be able to support secure SMTP (SSL/TLS) has caused the Debian Bug report #159511, regarding project: debian smtp servers should be able to support secure SMTP (SSL/TLS) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 159511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=159511 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03 Severity: wishlist Hello, please support secure SMTP (rfc2487) to have a secure and private communication on none-official mailinglists. thx. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux neo 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- forwarded 159511 https://rt.debian.org//Ticket/Display.html?id=111 thanks Hi, this issue has been reported in the Debian RT where it is more appropriate (now), so I'm closing the BTS bug. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#316582: marked as done (project: please allow dots in DNS records)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:22:35 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#316582: project: please allow dots in DNS records has caused the Debian Bug report #316582, regarding project: please allow dots in DNS records to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 316582: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316582 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Severity: wishlist First of all, I'm _not_ asking for zone delegations. I'm just asking for something like foo.bar.debian.net to be allowed for A, MX and CNAME records. If the answer is no, won't do it, I'd like to see the reason documented at http://db.debian.org/doc-mail.html or at least a link on that page to a page containing the rationale for that desicion. Thanks! Marcelo ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- forwarded https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=595 thanks First of all, I'm _not_ asking for zone delegations. I'm just asking for something like foo.bar.debian.net to be allowed for A, MX and CNAME records. If the answer is no, won't do it, I'd like to see the reason documented at http://db.debian.org/doc-mail.html or at least a link on that page to a page containing the rationale for that desicion. Moving the request to rt.debian.org, closing the BTS copy. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#148034: marked as done (DMUP: Please clarify limitation on news usage)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:28:32 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#148034: DMUP: Please clarify limitation on news usage has caused the Debian Bug report #148034, regarding DMUP: Please clarify limitation on news usage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 148034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=148034 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-24 Severity: wishlist In the Mail/News paragraph of the DMUP, nothing is said about news at all. However, a few paragraphs further down, it states the following: Don't use Debian facilities in a manner which constitutes net abuse. Debian does not have any Usenet news servers. It may be that some of the Debian machines have access to such a news server, but their use through Debian machines is strictly forbidden. I find this unclear. I assume it means that one cannot a news server that belongs to an ISP which sponsor the internet connection to this particular machine, and which limits the usage on that server based on what the IP address of the connecting client is. This is fine by me. But what about public news servers? If my interpretation of the abuse paragraph is correct, should I assume that I am allowed to use other servers? A paragraph further down seems to strenghen this assumption: Examples of what we consider net abuse: [..] * Binary Postings to non-Binary Groups If using news is not allowed at all in the first place, then this would be redundant. So, a clarification as to whether news is not allowed at all, or news is fine as long as you don't use our sponsor's news server would have been appreciated. Regards, Tore Anderson -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lush 2.4.18-xfs-1.1 #1 Fri May 17 18:22:32 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- forwarded https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=596 thanks I'm moving this DMUP bug report to the Debian RT. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: bug 148034 is forwarded to https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=596
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 forwarded 148034 https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=596 Bug#148034: DMUP: Please clarify limitation on news usage Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=596. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: found 31581 in 3.1, fixed 31581 in 4.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 found 31581 3.1 Bug#31581: project: Time between releases is too long Bug marked as found in version 3.1 and reopened. fixed 31581 4.0 Bug#31581: project: Time between releases is too long Bug marked as fixed in version 4.0. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#354747: marked as done (db.debian.org: SSL certificate expired)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:16:00 +0930 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line db.debian.org HTTPS SSL cert has been updated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: project Severity: normal Hi, the HTTP SSL certificate of db.debian.org expired. Please renew it. Greetings Martin ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, The db.debian.org HTTPS SSL cert has been updated, sometime in the past year, but DSA don't seem to have noticed this bug or closed it. The new cert expires on 2008-05-24, if it doesn't get updated before that date, please add a ticket to rt.debian.org: http://wiki.debian.org/rt.debian.org -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Bug#316581: marked as done (project: db.debian.org not accepting key in keyring)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:20:24 +0930
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line samosa has been upgraded to etch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: project
(Proposed solution at the end)
I've been trying to update/change/add some information via the Mail
Gateway to the developer's database. Each time I get an error message
from the gateway telling me that the key wasn't found. The error
message does not specify _which_ key wasn't found. That alone is a
bug, since it's a bad error message and is leaving the user with less
information than before.
Reading thru
http://cvs.debian.org/userdir-ldap/userdir_gpg.py?rev=1.12cvsroot=debian-admincontent-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
I guess that the function (method?) GPGCheckSig(Message) is doing
something wrong. From what I can understand:
Res = GPGWriteFilter(GPGPath,GPGSigOptions,Message);
that's calling gpg with --no-options --batch --no-default-keyring
--secret-keyring /dev/null --always-trust --status-fd 3 {some keyring}
--output - as the only options and feeding it the message extracted
from my mail. Doing that locally I see:
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 74 0
gpg: Signature made Thu Jun 30 06:53:16 2005 CST using RSA key ID 8404D500
[GNUPG:] SIG_ID ignST9aX/c8PLWfzpa4lCVsKJh0 2005-06-30 1120135996
[GNUPG:] GOODSIG 7198A8208404D500 Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: Good signature from Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[GNUPG:] VALIDSIG 9D44CA6C99DFB718AAEAF1687198A8208404D500 2005-06-30
1120135996 0 4 0 1 2 01 4389F70092A2044E83520EFE7A81833366468D05
The fingerprint is the data that comes along with VALIDSIG. From the
code:
# ValidSig has the key finger print
if Split[1] == VALIDSIG:
KeyFinger = Split[2];
So it's using 9D44CA6C99DFB718AAEAF1687198A8208404D500 as the
fingerprint. That's the fingerprint of the 8404D500 subkey.
The morale is I can't use subkeys to talk to the mail gateway. Doing
this:
$ gpg --clearsign -u '66468D05!' zone | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solves my problem.
As a _minimum_ to consider this bug addressed, this information should
be added to the documentation (The mailgateway does not support
messages signed with subkeys, you have to use the primary key, like
this ...), but that doesn't fix it.
A message signed with the primary key produces:
[GNUPG:] VALIDSIG 4389F70092A2044E83520EFE7A81833366468D05 2005-07-02
1120269865 0 4 0 17 2 01 4389F70092A2044E83520EFE7A81833366468D05
My guess is that you want the _last_ item on that line (the primary
key's fingerprint) and not the one right after VALIDSIG, since the LDAP
gateway only contains the primary fingerprints.
So... I've read my share of Python for this year, I guess that should
up my karma back to zero or perhaps even a bit above it...
Thanks,
Marcelo
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
According to [1], samosa is now running etch, so this should no longer
be an issue. If it is still an issue, please open a ticket in RT[2].
1. http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
2. http://wiki.debian.org/rt.debian.org
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---
Processed: standardize handling of 'http_proxy' environment variable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 399706 project Bug#399706: soap4r should not request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized Bug#396304: soap4r should not request USE_SOAP_PROXY, or it should be standardized Bug reassigned from package `apt-listbugs' to `project'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410129: Info received (Bug#410129: installation-guide: minor fix for section 1.1 _What is Debian_)
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org If you wish to continue to submit further information on this problem, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: retitle bug report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package project Ignoring bugs not assigned to: project retitle 344126 Configuration tool on the GNOME desktop Bug#344126: Configation tool on the GNOME desktop Changed Bug title. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: email change
Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 142750 ! Bug#142750: [external] Should check if .la files referenced in other .la files are from this package or dependencies Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 104122 ! Bug#104122: 'quirks' mode for broken pages Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 272289 ! Bug#272289: fetchmail sends a double @ to the SMTP server on MAIL FROM Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 252146 ! Bug#252146: vrms: Reports purged package Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 246575 ! Bug#246575: classpath-common: upgrade from classpath 2:0.07-2 fails (missing Replaces?) Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 270745 ! Bug#270745: libc6-i686: does not re-exec init Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 223101 ! Bug#223101: avifile-player: aviplay hangs without LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.22 Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 240287 ! Bug#240287: firebird-server-common: Should add system group instead of normal group Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 267433 ! Bug#267433: ttf-arabeyes: defoma errors on postinst Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 64428 ! Bug#64428: dbootstrap should check if right set of driver images is being used Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 64430 ! Bug#64430: should install kernel from package instead of hacking it in Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 64432 ! Bug#64432: should have a way to avoid installing modules Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 64569 ! Bug#64569: Should allow use of swapfile instead of swap partition Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 64570 ! Bug#64570: Should allow umsdos installs Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 64571 ! Bug#64571: Should ask for confirmation of network settings Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 282991 ! Bug#282991: libstdc++6-dbg: lib64 debug files should be in another package Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#155998: Please close when appropriate
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 155998 - woody Bug#155998: project: .all.deb not installable on all architectures/dependency woody - unstable Tags were: woody Tags removed: woody reassign 155998 project,dak Bug#155998: project: .all.deb not installable on all architectures/dependency woody - unstable Bug reassigned from package `project' to `project,dak'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: No longer applies
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 155998 + woody Bug#155998: project: .all.deb not installable on all architectures/dependency woody - unstable There were no tags set. Tags added: woody thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:28:51 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2003 13:09:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 14 08:09:29 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19yWd7-000629-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:09:29 -0500 Received: from arf ([67.75.25.91]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:09:26 -0400 Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19yWe2-0002qC-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:26 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:25 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: doc-debian Version: 3.0.2 Severity: wishlist There's some odd language in '/usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt': 1 A resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer 2 and sponsored by at least K other Developers... ...and the number 'K' is later defined, in part, as follows: 3 Q and K need not be integers and are not rounded. This implies fractional Developers. In line #2 above the author must have meant an integer, (or rather a natural number -- there aren't any negative numbers of Developers), but saying at least leaves room for doubt, especially since line #3 says K isn't rounded! Example: suppose K=4.4; but by line #3 'K' is not rounded, (if it were we'd know a quorum would be at least 5, or 4.4 rounded up), and if it's not rounded then .4 of a Developer means who knows what. For line #3 I suggest changing 'integers' to 'natural numbers' or 'whole numbers', and 'and are not rounded' to 'and are rounded up when counting people, but not when counting votes.' ...or something to the same effect. (Of course we all know a Constitution is by design not as easy to amend as a garden variety typo. Difficulty shouldn't justify errors though.) Hope this helps us become wholly impartial. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 210879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2003 09:59:00 + From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Fri Dec 26 03:59:00 2003 Return-path: aj@azure.humbug.org.au Received: from azure.erisian.com.au [64.235.236.133] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AZmXp-000344-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 01:38:01 -0600 Received: from aj by azure.erisian.com.au with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AZmRN-00072M-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:31:21 +1000 Received: from aj by cyan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AZmOx-0006Xs-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:28:51 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: close Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:28:51 +1000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 X-Spam-Level: yawn
Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:04:22 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2003 13:09:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 14 08:09:29 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19yWd7-000629-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:09:29 -0500 Received: from arf ([67.75.25.91]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:09:26 -0400 Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19yWe2-0002qC-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:26 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:25 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: doc-debian Version: 3.0.2 Severity: wishlist There's some odd language in '/usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt': 1 A resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer 2 and sponsored by at least K other Developers... ...and the number 'K' is later defined, in part, as follows: 3 Q and K need not be integers and are not rounded. This implies fractional Developers. In line #2 above the author must have meant an integer, (or rather a natural number -- there aren't any negative numbers of Developers), but saying at least leaves room for doubt, especially since line #3 says K isn't rounded! Example: suppose K=4.4; but by line #3 'K' is not rounded, (if it were we'd know a quorum would be at least 5, or 4.4 rounded up), and if it's not rounded then .4 of a Developer means who knows what. For line #3 I suggest changing 'integers' to 'natural numbers' or 'whole numbers', and 'and are not rounded' to 'and are rounded up when counting people, but not when counting votes.' ...or something to the same effect. (Of course we all know a Constitution is by design not as easy to amend as a garden variety typo. Difficulty shouldn't justify errors though.) Hope this helps us become wholly impartial. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 210879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2003 04:06:01 + From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Sat Nov 29 22:06:00 2003 Return-path: aj@azure.humbug.org.au Received: from azure.erisian.com.au [64.235.236.133] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AQIqN-0001Ch-00; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:06:00 -0600 Received: from aj by azure.erisian.com.au with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQIpb-000367-04; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:05:11 +1000 Received: from aj by cyan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQIoo-0001cM-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:04:22 +1000 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:04:22 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Disposition: inline Organisation: Lacking X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc X-No-CC: Don't Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_70,FOOASDF
Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: close 210879
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 210879 Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)
Your message dated Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:58:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Leave this bug closed PLEASE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2003 13:09:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 14 08:09:29 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19yWd7-000629-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:09:29 -0500
Received: from arf ([67.75.25.91]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:09:26
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19yWe2-0002qC-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:26 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not
integers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:25 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using From header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: doc-debian
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: wishlist
There's some odd language in '/usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt':
1 A resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer
2 and sponsored by at least K other Developers...
...and the number 'K' is later defined, in part, as follows:
3 Q and K need not be integers and are not rounded.
This implies fractional Developers. In line #2 above the author must
have meant an integer, (or rather a natural number -- there aren't any
negative numbers of Developers), but saying at least leaves room for
doubt, especially since line #3 says K isn't rounded!
Example: suppose K=4.4; but by line #3 'K' is not rounded, (if it were we'd
know a quorum would be at least 5, or 4.4 rounded up), and if it's not
rounded then .4 of a Developer means who knows what.
For line #3 I suggest changing 'integers' to 'natural numbers' or 'whole
numbers', and 'and are not rounded' to 'and are rounded up when counting
people, but not when counting votes.' ...or something to the same
effect.
(Of course we all know a Constitution is by design not as easy to amend
as a garden variety typo. Difficulty shouldn't justify errors though.)
Hope this helps us become wholly impartial.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 210879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2003 14:59:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 11 09:59:19 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from play.smurf.noris.de [192.109.102.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A8LDB-0008Kd-00; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 09:59:17 -0500
Received: from smurf by play.smurf.noris.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1A8LCQ-0004AX-00; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:58:30 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:58:30 +0200
From: Smurf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Leave this bug closed PLEASE
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0-gpgme-021125a
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
I hesitate to say this, but please actually listen to Please do not
reopen this bug unless you have anything new to add and I think you
should demonstrate consensus on -project that there is a problem.
Thank you.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
A man's home may seem to be his castle on the outside; inside it is more
often his nursery.
Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:45:24 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line There was nothing new in the reopen message
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2003 13:09:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 14 08:09:29 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19yWd7-000629-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:09:29 -0500
Received: from arf ([67.75.25.91]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:09:26
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19yWe2-0002qC-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:26 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not
integers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:25 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using From header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: doc-debian
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: wishlist
There's some odd language in '/usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt':
1 A resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer
2 and sponsored by at least K other Developers...
...and the number 'K' is later defined, in part, as follows:
3 Q and K need not be integers and are not rounded.
This implies fractional Developers. In line #2 above the author must
have meant an integer, (or rather a natural number -- there aren't any
negative numbers of Developers), but saying at least leaves room for
doubt, especially since line #3 says K isn't rounded!
Example: suppose K=4.4; but by line #3 'K' is not rounded, (if it were we'd
know a quorum would be at least 5, or 4.4 rounded up), and if it's not
rounded then .4 of a Developer means who knows what.
For line #3 I suggest changing 'integers' to 'natural numbers' or 'whole
numbers', and 'and are not rounded' to 'and are rounded up when counting
people, but not when counting votes.' ...or something to the same
effect.
(Of course we all know a Constitution is by design not as easy to amend
as a garden variety typo. Difficulty shouldn't justify errors though.)
Hope this helps us become wholly impartial.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 210879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2003 01:49:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 10 20:48:52 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com)
[12.107.230.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A88sE-0005pj-00; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:48:50 -0500
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
h9B1jO6e007936
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:45:25 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) id
h9B1jOYB007932;
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:45:24 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.green-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.1 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There was nothing new in the reopen message
From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Microsoft Gnus Express, Build 5.1003 (5.10.3)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78OsbQ[56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIaxWg1VcjZk[hBQ]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzbi0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:45:24 -0500
Message-ID
Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- K Developers ... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 210879 ! Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:05:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line There was nothing in the reopen message to demostrate a bug
exists
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2003 13:09:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 14 08:09:29 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19yWd7-000629-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:09:29 -0500
Received: from arf ([67.75.25.91]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:09:26
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19yWe2-0002qC-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:26 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not
integers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:10:25 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using From header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: doc-debian
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: wishlist
There's some odd language in '/usr/share/doc/debian/constitution.txt':
1 A resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer
2 and sponsored by at least K other Developers...
...and the number 'K' is later defined, in part, as follows:
3 Q and K need not be integers and are not rounded.
This implies fractional Developers. In line #2 above the author must
have meant an integer, (or rather a natural number -- there aren't any
negative numbers of Developers), but saying at least leaves room for
doubt, especially since line #3 says K isn't rounded!
Example: suppose K=4.4; but by line #3 'K' is not rounded, (if it were we'd
know a quorum would be at least 5, or 4.4 rounded up), and if it's not
rounded then .4 of a Developer means who knows what.
For line #3 I suggest changing 'integers' to 'natural numbers' or 'whole
numbers', and 'and are not rounded' to 'and are rounded up when counting
people, but not when counting votes.' ...or something to the same
effect.
(Of course we all know a Constitution is by design not as easy to amend
as a garden variety typo. Difficulty shouldn't justify errors though.)
Hope this helps us become wholly impartial.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 210879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 00:08:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 09 19:08:49 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com)
[12.107.230.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7kpt-0003wO-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:08:49 -0500
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
h9A05v6e015400
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:05:58 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) id
h9A05vgG015396;
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:05:57 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.green-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.1 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There was nothing in the reopen message to demostrate a bug exists
From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
(i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78OsbQ[56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIaxWg1VcjZk[hBQ]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja
Processed: Re: Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 210879 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] reassign 210879 project Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K Developers... not integers Bug reassigned from package `doc-debian' to `project'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#97671: marked as done (xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#97671: tech ctte resolution requested re: severity of bug#97671/143825 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2001 11:53:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 06:53:55 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cirkus.samfundet.no [129.241.93.17] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14zzsJ-0005m4-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:53:55 -0500 Received: from gagatan.samfundet.no (gagatan.samfundet.no [129.241.93.132]) by cirkus.samfundet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5099A8015 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:53:54 + (CET) Received: from arabella.pvv.org (ti29a64-0233.dialup.online.no [130.67.137.233]) by gagatan.samfundet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B60B39665 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by arabella.pvv.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 82423E91; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:53:51 +0200 (CEST) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Sender: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-URL: http://www.add.no/~tollef/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?ELF=A0file?= as conffile? Mail-Copies-To: never From: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 16 May 2001 13:53:51 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xutils Version: 4.03-3 It seems like /etc/X11/rstart/rsartd.real is both an ELF file and conffile. This seems strange to me - and what is a runnable, compiled program doing in /etc? Shouldn't that go into /usr/X11R6 somewhere? -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are. --- Received: (at 97671-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 11:40:37 + From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Fri Jul 25 06:40:34 2003 Return-path: aj@azure.humbug.org.au Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure) [64.235.236.133] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19g0w5-000853-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:40:33 -0500 Received: from aj by azure with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19g0w5-0001wl-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:33 +1000 Received: from aj by cyan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19g0vv-0002ST-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:23 +1000 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#97671: tech ctte resolution requested re: severity of bug#97671/143825 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Disposition: inline Organisation: Lacking X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc X-No-CC: Don't Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Branden, Ian Jackson, as tech ctte chairman, wrote: The Technical Committee has already referred this question to the Bug System Administrators and the Project Leadership. Quoting from our resolution on the matter: Branden Robinson, in a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: merge 97671 143825 severity normal tag 97671 + help upstream thanks As the tech ctte have resolved not to do anything about this bug, and two project leaders have refrained from touching it at all, you're evidently not going to get a more authoritative judgement on the severity of Bug#143825, than mine whether taken as either release manager or one of the BTS maintainers. If you choose not to accept this, and cannot get either the tech ctte or the DPL to actively support your position overruling my judgement, but try to downgrade the bug nevertheless
Processed: pending meaning change
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 97671 - pending Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 143825 - pending Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 155374 - pending Bug#155374: Where are Installation Manual and Release Notes Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 169264 - pending Bug#169264: discover: postinst fails if /cdrom mounted Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 169413 - pending Bug#169413: kernel-patch-ck: depends on kernel-patch-scripts which is priority extra Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 170820 - pending Bug#170820: phpgroupware does not preservs user changes in configuration file Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 188877 - pending Bug#188877: flex: new upstream release breaks builds Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 189832 - pending Bug#189832: libglibwww-ssl1: linked with 2 versions of libssl Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending tags 190592 - pending Bug#190592: paul: not installable: it depends on libgtkdatabox-0.1.13-0 Tags were: pending sid Tags removed: pending tags 196234 - pending Bug#196234: python2.2 - depends against optional package libdb4.1 Tags were: pending Bug#197665: vacation - depends against optional package libdb4.1 Tags removed: pending tags 198337 - pending Bug#198337: user-mode-linux: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: this old thing again
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 97671 143825 Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #97671 has `project'; #143825 has `xutils' severity normal Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. tag 97671 + help upstream Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? There were no tags set. Tags added: help, upstream thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#199214: marked as done (project: dependency perlapi-5.6.1 removed from sarge prematurely)
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2003 18:05:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#199214: project: dependency perlapi-5.6.1 removed from sarge prematurely has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2003 03:35:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 28 22:35:01 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19WSxx-0003yw-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:35:01 -0500 Received: from user-119bqa4.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.233.68] helo=nutter.linuxdelivery.com) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19WSxw-0001k2-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:35:00 -0700 Received: from hedges by nutter.linuxdelivery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19WSxw-DE-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:35:00 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mark Hedges [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: project: dependency perlapi-5.6.1 removed from sarge prematurely X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:35:00 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Mark Hedges [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: project Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-28 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable perlapi-5.6.1 disappeared from sarge after rollout of perl 5.8.0. This package is essential to apt-file and many other common utilities. Packages should not be removed from a distribution if other packages in the distribution depend on them, or if there is no dummy package prepared to make new components backwards-compatible. --mark-- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nutter.linuxdelivery.com 2.4.20 #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 17:48:13 PDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 199214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2003 17:05:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 29 12:05:48 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from public1-sout4-4-cust60.sout.broadband.ntl.com (cyclone) [81.103.170.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19WfcZ-0005VS-00; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:05:48 -0500 Received: from asuffield by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19WfcZ-aZ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 18:05:47 +0100 Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 18:05:47 +0100 From: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#199214: project: dependency perlapi-5.6.1 removed from sarge prematurely Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Monty-Python: No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition! X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 08:35:00PM -0700, Mark Hedges wrote: perlapi-5.6.1 disappeared from sarge after rollout of perl 5.8.0. This package is essential to apt-file and many other common utilities. Packages should not be removed from a distribution if other packages in the distribution depend on them, or if there is no dummy package prepared to make new components backwards-compatible. Filing the same (stupid, FAQ) bug multiple times does _not_ help, it's just stupid
Bug#50577: marked as done (package fan list wanted)
Your message dated 05 Jan 2003 21:56:20 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line package fan list wanted has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 1999 18:42:01 + Received: (qmail 7315 invoked from network); 18 Nov 1999 18:41:59 - Received: from mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (134.2.3.13) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 1999 18:41:59 - Received: from borkum (zxmjz18.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [172.16.9.8]) by mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA17277; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:41:56 +0100 Received: by zxmjz18.extern.uni-tuebingen.de via sendmail from stdin id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:07:05 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: package fan list wanted X-Reportbug-Version: 0.42 X-Mailer: reportbug 0.42 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:07:05 +0100 Package: lists.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 1999-11-18 Severity: wishlist I often want to know when a new version of a package comes out or if new bug reports are found for a certain package. Currently the onlz sollution is to look manually or to get flooded with info about ALL packages by subscribing to the general bug mailing list. What I want would be for each package a mailinglist, e.g. package name[EMAIL PROTECTED] to which all bug reports would be forwared automatically. Also on upload the top of the Changelog could be posted. The maintainer should be subscribed there too, but should not recieve bug reports twice. A nice solution would be to use package name@packages.debian.org as the mailinglist address and tell the bug reports to use that address instead of the maintainer ones (if it doesn't do that already). May the Source be with you. Goswin -- System Information Debian Release: potato Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux borkum 2.2.13 #2 Wed Oct 20 16:30:02 CEST 1999 alpha --- Received: (at 50577-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2003 22:06:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 05 16:06:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.168.141] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18VIuV-0005Ym-00; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 16:06:23 -0600 Received: from modem-1513.alligator.dialup.pol.co.uk ([81.78.5.233]) by tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18VIuR-0004QL-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:06:19 + Subject: package fan list wanted From: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 05 Jan 2003 21:56:20 + Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJECT_IS_LIST version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi guys, Just noticed this old report in the bts. Your request looks like something implemented by the Package Tracking System (PTS): http://packages.qa.debian.org/ HTH. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 173281 to dselect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 173281 dselect Bug#173281: project: Dselect Background bug Bug reassigned from package `project' to `dselect'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: not us dammit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 97671 project Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `project'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 97671 tech-ctte Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org, project' to `tech-ctte'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#168394: project: translationbug in German tin-options
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 168394 tin Bug#168394: project: translationbug in German tin-options Bug reassigned from package `project' to `tin'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassign 168122 to alsa-xmms
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 168122 alsa-xmms Bug#168122: project: alsa-xmms Bug reassigned from package `project' to `alsa-xmms'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#158533: marked as done (project: qmail is installed on murphy)
Your message dated Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:02:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line no longer a bug. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2002 20:00:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 27 15:00:08 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.hal-pc.org [206.180.145.133] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17jmVU-0004XA-00; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:00:08 -0500 Received: from [24.167.56.11] (HELO stonewall) by mail.hal-pc.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with SMTP id 18512972; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:00:07 -0500 Received: by stonewall (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 + Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 + From: Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: project: qmail is installed on murphy Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.50 X-Operating-System: Linux stonewall 2.4.18-k7 Content-Conversion: prohibited X-Request-PGP: http://decoy.wox.org/~bmc/openpgp/pub560553e7.asc Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: project Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-27 Severity: serious Justification: violates Social Contract 1, 4, and 5 (maybe others) The subject says it all. qmail is installed on murphy.debian.org. qmail is non-free. Debian should not be using non-free software on its own systems. I will quote from the Social Contract to show why this is so. Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software is very clear, I think. [W]e will never make the system depend on an item of non-free software. Your systems are depending on items of non-free software. The default mail-transport-agent for installation is exim, and that is what most other machines run, but not murphy. Thus, although non-free software isn't a part of Debian, we support its use, and we provide infrastructure (such as our bug-tracking system and mailing lists) for non-free software packages. I think the support you meant here was provide quality assurance for not endorse. I think running qmail is the latter. Also, note that non-free software isn't a part of Debian. So it should not be on your machines. We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free-software community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. I'm sorry, but it does not seem like you have the interests of the free-software community first by running qmail. I have included two telnet sessions: one is with murphy, and one is with a friend's machine, which is also a Debian machine running qmail. The dead giveaway is that even with an EHLO, qmail is silent about the software which is running. Transaction with murphy.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet murphy.debian.org 25 Trying 65.125.64.134... Connected to murphy.debian.org. Escape character is '^]'. ehlo stonewall 220 murphy.debian.org ESMTP 250-murphy.debian.org 250-PIPELINING 250 8BITMIME rset 250 flushed quit 221 murphy.debian.org Connection closed by foreign host. Transaction with decoy.wox.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet decoy.wox.org 25 Trying 206.180.155.20... Connected to 206.180.155.20.adsl.hal-pc.org. Escape character is '^]'. 220 decoy.wox.org ESMTP ehlo stonewall 250-decoy.wox.org 250-PIPELINING 250 8BITMIME rset 250 flushed quit 221 decoy.wox.org Connection closed by foreign host. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux stonewall 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (ignored: LC_ALL set) -- no debconf information --=20 Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://decoy.wox.org/~bmc 0x560553= E7 If John Madden steps outside on February 2, looks down, and doesn't see hi= s=20 feet, we'll have 6 more weeks of Pro football. -- Chuck Newcombe --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Ubi libertas, ibi patria. iQFKBAEBAwA0BQI9a9pILRpodHRwOi8vZGVjb3kud294Lm9yZy9+Ym1jL29wZW5w Z3AvcG9saWN5LnRleAAKCRDlkf/JVgVT5/ZCB/4qGvddRttTndHauDGdOHaBsxOs JUeszRloshI
Processed: Re: Bug#157123: project: modify emacs policy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 157123 emacsen-common Bug#157123: project: modify emacs policy Bug reassigned from package `project' to `emacsen-common'. retitle 157123 emacsen-common: policy should require .el files to be in the emacs load-path Bug#157123: project: modify emacs policy Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: ressign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 148629 balsa Bug#148629: project: Compilation of balsa sources fails using debuild Bug reassigned from package `project' to `balsa'. severity 148629 serious Bug#148629: project: Compilation of balsa sources fails using debuild Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#137840: project: file:///usr/doc/libmime-perl/MIME/Parser.pm.html is missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 137840 libmime-perl Bug#137840: project: file:///usr/doc/libmime-perl/MIME/Parser.pm.html is missing Bug reassigned from package `project' to `libmime-perl'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#136948: marked as done (project: tut nicht)
Your message dated Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:48:51 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#136948: project: tut nicht has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2002 15:19:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 05 09:19:34 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jewel.mcs-hh.de [194.77.146.129] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16iGiz-000709-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 09:19:33 -0600 Received: from e605.toxine.lan ([212.1.56.10]) by jewel.mcs-hh.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/MCS-20011210-01) with ESMTP id g25FJVd4027125; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:19:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from matthias by e605.toxine.lan with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16iGun-0002uc-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:31:45 +0100 From: Debian User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: project: tut nicht To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:31:45 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: project Version: 20020305 Severity: important scheiß teil, ich schmeiss dass ding in die elbe -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux e605 2.4.17 #2 Fri Jan 18 10:48:08 CET 2002 i686 unknown --- Received: (at 136948-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2002 15:48:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 05 09:48:58 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from square.phys.uu.nl (square.A-Es2.oi) [131.211.34.218] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16iHBR-qR-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 09:48:58 -0600 Received: from richard.a-es2.oi ([192.168.1.3]) by square.A-Es2.oi with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16iHBM-0001al-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:48:52 +0100 Received: from bas by richard.a-es2.oi with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16iHBL-0005Xt-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:48:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:48:51 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#136948: project: tut nicht Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Operating-System: Linux richard 2.4.13-ac5 X-Mail-Backup-To: Bas Zoetekouw Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Debian! You wrote: scheiß teil, ich schmeiss dass ding in die elbe Danke sehr. Vielleicht können Sie besser MS Windows installieren auf Ihre Komputer. -- Kind regards, +---+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce | || que l'on va faire, a quoi| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso | +---+
Processed: moving out of limbo^Wgeneral
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 60622 login Bug#60622: Users with shell /bin/false are not logged out correctly Bug reassigned from package `general' to `login'. reassign 69090 login,sudo Bug#69090: shell variables in su/sudo Bug reassigned from package `general' to `login,sudo'. reassign 99954 sysvinit Bug#99954: the shutdown process should not freeze when a /etc/init.d script freezes Bug reassigned from package `general' to `sysvinit'. tag 107862 wontfix Bug#107862: newly installed services start automatically Tags added: wontfix reassign 120741 xserver-xfree86 Bug#120741: General: XFree86 has found a valid card configration. Anfortunately the appropritiate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h Bug reassigned from package `general' to `xserver-xfree86'. close 128977 Bug#128977: general: sparcstation 5, s24 framebuffer, suntcx xserver, needs 32 bpp instead of 24bpp Bug closed, send any further explanations to Brady McCary [EMAIL PROTECTED] reopen 128977 Brady McCary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#128977: general: sparcstation 5, s24 framebuffer, suntcx xserver, needs 32 bpp instead of 24bpp Bug reopened, originator set to Brady McCary [EMAIL PROTECTED]. reassign 128977 xserver-xfree86 Bug#128977: general: sparcstation 5, s24 framebuffer, suntcx xserver, needs 32 bpp instead of 24bpp Bug reassigned from package `general' to `xserver-xfree86'. reassign 109393 libdb2 Bug#109393: general: Upgrade from Potato-Woody fails with complaints of 'libdb2.so.3' missing, and other dependency issues libc6-dev, etc Bug reassigned from package `general' to `libdb2'. reassign 69271 project Bug#69271: praise tracking system Bug reassigned from package `general' to `project'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#122859: project: gnucash seems to be missing dependencies
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 122859 gnucash Bug#122859: project: gnucash seems to be missing dependencies Bug reassigned from package `project' to `gnucash'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 121456 apt-proxy Bug#121456: project: apt-proxy needs grep-dctrl to work, but it is not included in the requirements for apt-proxy Bug reassigned from package `project' to `apt-proxy'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#118593: project: {Debian2.2r4,potato}/Release file says it is 2.2r3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 118593 ftp.debian.org
Bug#118593: project: {Debian2.2r4,potato}/Release file says it is 2.2r3
Bug reassigned from package `project' to `ftp.debian.org'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
