Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 23:10 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> You can shorten the lines of choices 3 & 5 and send the email through
> GMail. See your sent messages as to where the wrap happened.

Hmmm... I overlooked this one.  This is very interesting workaround.

Now I know all the tricks even if I don't use mutt.

Regards,

Osamu





Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:59:24AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> This is not GMAIL problem.  This involves only My PC and Debian
> servers.
> 
> (I use gmail only for recieving mails.  I send mail from my Debian
> shell account using SSH when I use @debuian.org address to avoid mail
> rejections.  So Gmail has nothing to do with my problem.)
> 
> $ date -u --iso=sec
> 2021-04-15T23:44:44+00:00
> 
> So still in voting period as far as I am concerned.
> 
> I think the problem is:
> > >gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir
> > >'/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_rms'
> 
> I think times execution of permission setting to close voting may have
> kicked in too early.

Hi Osamu,

I've replied privately to the mail you've sent to secretary,
but I'm not sure that you saw it.

I see that you attempted to vote again, and that you got the same
error.

Your 3 messages for the RMS GR were not signed, while your
mail to the DPL election was signed.

The error message contained:
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.

Which is almost always that there is no signature. Please make
sure that you actually sign the email.

There is no permission problem, nor a problem that the vote is
over. Other people are able to vote.


Kurt



Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Jessica Clarke
On 16 Apr 2021, at 00:59, Osamu Aoki  wrote:
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> This is not GMAIL problem.  This involves only My PC and Debian
> servers.
> 
> (I use gmail only for recieving mails.  I send mail from my Debian
> shell account using SSH when I use @debuian.org address to avoid mail
> rejections.  So Gmail has nothing to do with my problem.)
> 
> $ date -u --iso=sec
> 2021-04-15T23:44:44+00:00
> 
> So still in voting period as far as I am concerned.
> 
> I think the problem is:
>>>   gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir
>>>   '/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_rms'
> 
> I think times execution of permission setting to close voting may have
> kicked in too early.

No, that’s just a warning, it happens on every ballot, though you only see it
if there’s also another error. You’re likely running into the same problem I
did, which is that the RMS ballot has lines long enough to be wrapped under
quoted printable, whereas the DPL election fits within the line limit. Are you
using an inline signature rather than a detached signature? The former is not
robust against MTA wrapping, but the latter is, and is what’s recommended.

Jess



Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi again,

This is not GMAIL problem.  This involves only My PC and Debian
servers.

(I use gmail only for recieving mails.  I send mail from my Debian
shell account using SSH when I use @debuian.org address to avoid mail
rejections.  So Gmail has nothing to do with my problem.)

$ date -u --iso=sec
2021-04-15T23:44:44+00:00

So still in voting period as far as I am concerned.

I think the problem is:
> >gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir
> >'/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_rms'

I think times execution of permission setting to close voting may have
kicked in too early.

Regards,

Osamu

> At https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 is stated
> that the voting ends Saturday 2021-04-17 23:59:59 UTC
> 
> So my "Voting period is over" is wrong.
> My fellow DD is dealing with something as "too late".
> 
> 
>  
> Groeten
> Geert Stappers
> DD
> Cc: debian-v...@lists.debian.org

-- 
Osamu Aoki 



Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 4/15/21 6:15 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:46 AM Osamu Aoki  wrote:
>>
>> Is this only me?
>>
>> My Leader vote worked.  So I think my new mail setup is working.
> 
> had the same issue: gmail wrapped a line when sending the clearsigned
> message to vote.d.o - resent it with mutt, all worked; maybe it's
> something similar?

I believe you're right, especially when reading:

   gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
   gpg: the signature could not be verified.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)



Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Richard Hartmann
You can shorten the lines of choices 3 & 5 and send the email through
GMail. See your sent messages as to where the wrap happened.

Best,
Richard



Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:46 AM Osamu Aoki  wrote:
>
> Is this only me?
>
> My Leader vote worked.  So I think my new mail setup is working.

had the same issue: gmail wrapped a line when sending the clearsigned
message to vote.d.o - resent it with mutt, all worked; maybe it's
something similar?

-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi



Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:43:51AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Is this only me?

That will take more data points  ;-)

 
> My Leader vote worked.  So I think my new mail setup is working.

Acknowledge on that.

 
> But my gr_rms is rejected (2 cases each with main key and sub key
> signed).  This sounds like not my side of issue.
> 
>Hi,
>
>   This is an error report about your vote [record
>msg00481.raw]
> for the vote
> "Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF
>board"
> sent in on Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:37:20 +0900, with the subject
> "Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's
> readmission to the FSF board: Second call for votes"
> The message ID is
>.
> The message base is msg00481.
> The following errors were reported:
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>There was a problem verifying the signature on the ballot.
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir
>'/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_rms'
>gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
>gpg: the signature could not be verified.
>STATUS:
>[GNUPG:] NODATA 1[GNUPG:] NODATA 2-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>   This ballot is being rejected.
> 

At https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 is stated
that the voting ends Saturday 2021-04-17 23:59:59 UTC

So my "Voting period is over" is wrong.
My fellow DD is dealing with something as "too late".


 
Groeten
Geert Stappers
DD
Cc: debian-v...@lists.debian.org
-- 
Silence is hard to parse



"gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

2021-04-15 Thread Osamu Aoki
Is this only me?

My Leader vote worked.  So I think my new mail setup is working.

But my gr_rms is rejected (2 cases each with main key and sub key
signed).  This sounds like not my side of issue.

   Hi,
   
This is an error report about your vote [record
   msg00481.raw]
for the vote
"Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF
   board"
sent in on Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:37:20 +0900, with the subject
"Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's
readmission to the FSF board: Second call for votes"
The message ID is
   .
The message base is msg00481.
The following errors were reported:
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   =-=
   There was a problem verifying the signature on the ballot.
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   =-=
   gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir
   '/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_rms'
   gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
   gpg: the signature could not be verified.
   STATUS:
   [GNUPG:] NODATA 1[GNUPG:] NODATA 2-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
   
This ballot is being rejected.