Re: For those who care about stable updates

2006-03-09 Thread Clint Adams
 If you make James be lynched by the mob, I will go as well.

All the people who think it's appropriate to blackmail the project with
full or partial withdrawal of their services should probably start
listing in great detail those contributions which we would be missing
if they actually followed through on their threats.

That way the mob can make well-thought-out, dispassionate, logical
decisions about whom to exclude.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: For those who care about stable updates

2006-03-09 Thread Amaya
Hi Marga,

I tend to agree with you. Let's calm down.

Margarita Manterola wrote:
 For the next time, it would be better if before asking the DPL to
 relieve a fellow developer from his duties and making such a big plea
 as you've made, you'd consider hearing all the different sides of the
 story, taking into account the many additional factors, and then -and
 only then- write such a petition.

My perception, and maybe the perception of others, is that we, us poor
mortals, are deprived from seeing both sides of the story on a regular
basis. 

A recent mail from Aj to d-vote helped me understand, for example, the
last keyring-mainteinance conflicts and timeline. But that mail is a
rare exception, providing needed bits of information that James himself
seldom bothers to offer, which makes sense as he is or seems to be so
busy.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00263.html

No rant here, just again wondering why we are *again* discussing this.

-- 
 .''`.   I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think
: :' :   I have ended up where I needed to be   -- Douglas Adams
`. `'   Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
  `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: For those who care about stable updates

2006-03-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:59:37PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
 James: [...] I
 grieve at the harm you have done Debian in the evident
 blindness of your pride.  Your formidable enmity I may
 earn today.  If so, this in itself is a regrettable and
 serious matter, but so be it.  Now please go.

Well, at least Thaddeus stays on message, I guess [0].

One correction though; having earnt James' emnity in the past, I've got
to say, it's really not all that formidable [1].

Cheers,
a it's not loyalty, dude, it's respect j

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/12/msg00605.html

[1] Not that I don't still have those blackmail photos ready to be
automatically blogged in the case of my death or disappearance,
just in case you were wondering, Mr Troup...



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: For those who care about stable updates

2006-03-09 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:10:10AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
 That way the mob can make well-thought-out, dispassionate, logical
 decisions about whom to exclude.

After a flamewar? Allow me to 'hmm' on that one ;-)

-- 
Fun will now commence
  -- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: For those who care about stable updates

2006-03-09 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:59:37PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
 Branden, this is outrageous.  It has gone too far.  The
 Project has discussed the matter for years.  If the
 consensus is not that James does useful, steady work but

I think James does useful, steady work, yes. I also think that he is
overloaded with work and a bit paranoid -- as any good sysadmin should
be.

That's not to say that Joey's frustrations are to be ignored; but saying
that James is The Problem(TM) here sounds like overreaction to me.

Though I'll acknowledge that there is a problem if James is slow in
response on one of the many hats he's wearing, I urge you to respect him
for the huge and huge amounts of work he gets done for the Project.

-- 
Fun will now commence
  -- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: For those who care about stable updates

2006-03-09 Thread Sven Mueller
Wouter Verhelst wrote on 09/03/2006 19:28:
 [...] saying
 that James is The Problem(TM) here sounds like overreaction to me.

It might be.

 Though I'll acknowledge that there is a problem if James is slow in
 response on one of the many hats he's wearing, I urge you to respect him
 for the huge and huge amounts of work he gets done for the Project.

Well, if James himself isn't the problem, then the problem lies in the
many hats he's wearing (to use your words). If he is overloaded, he
should step back from one or more of those posts and let others fill in.

Honestly: I _do_ value the work James does (though I don't see much of
it, I still assume he does a lot in the background to keep the Debian
infrastructure working). But the problem is the work only he can do
currently, but which sits waiting in a long (and even getting longer) queue.

cu,
sven


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature