Re: xth wrap-up about statement on diversity, statement may be issued without general resolution (Re: Diversity statement for the Debian Project)

2012-04-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:47:04PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
 The message from Stefano Zacchiroli quoted below includes a wrap-up
 (of the wrap-up (of the...)) about the statement on diversity in
 contributors proposed by Francesca Ciceri.
 Stefano asked to publish it in #669011, although the statement is
 not approved.

I beg you pardon? It's been approved by me with that mail, after having
given time to comment on that to readers of this list. Also, please note
how -project was Cc:-ed on my request already (see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/04/msg00073.html) so it's
not clear to me why you felt there was a need to give this warning
kind of mail.

Cheers.
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ..   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ..   . . o
Debian Project Leader...   @zack on identi.ca   ...o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: xth wrap-up about statement on diversity, statement may be issued without general resolution (Re: Diversity statement for the Debian Project)

2012-04-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:25:21AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:47:04PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
  The message from Stefano Zacchiroli quoted below includes a wrap-up
  (of the wrap-up (of the...)) about the statement on diversity in
  contributors proposed by Francesca Ciceri.
  Stefano asked to publish it in #669011, although the statement is
  not approved.

 I beg you pardon? It's been approved by me with that mail, after having
 given time to comment on that to readers of this list. Also, please note
 how -project was Cc:-ed on my request already (see
 https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/04/msg00073.html) so it's
 not clear to me why you felt there was a need to give this warning
 kind of mail.

Perhaps because under the constitution, position statements are a power that
the developers exercise under GR, not a power that the DPL has?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Re: xth wrap-up about statement on diversity, statement may be issued without general resolution (Re: Diversity statement for the Debian Project)

2012-04-20 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Hi Stefano,

Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:47:04PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
  The message from Stefano Zacchiroli quoted below includes a wrap-up
  (of the wrap-up (of the...)) about the statement on diversity in
  contributors proposed by Francesca Ciceri.
  Stefano asked to publish it in #669011, although the statement is
  not approved.

I beg you pardon? It's been approved by me with that mail, after having
given time to comment on that to readers of this list.


approved in the sense of sanctioned. A few people did say they 
thought the statement should be issued.



  Also, please note
how -project was Cc:-ed on my request already (see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/04/msg00073.html) so it's
not clear to me why you felt there was a need to give this warning
kind of mail.


Yes, the information was already given, the purpose of my mail was 
simply to change the subject, making it obvious to quick readers of 
debian-project that your mail wasn't simply a comment on a draft proposal.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f91a785.60...@gmail.com