Re: [python-odtwriter] package name wrong?
Tristan Seligmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-10 09:17:54 +0100]: > > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:20:26PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > So python-docutils-writers-odtwriter would be the right name in > > > theory, but this doesn't make sense, indeed. > > > > Does anybody insist on that name? If not, I’m going to update the > > long description to mention the relationship to python-docutils, > > which probably would have avoided that bug report in the first > > place. > > Personally, I think that package name is ludicrous; python-odtwriter > seems fine The name 'python-docutils-odtwriter' seems better to me (I think what makes the above name ludicrous is the utterly redundant '-writers' in the middle). -- \ “A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for | `\ a coffin.” —Henry L. Mencken | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [python-odtwriter] package name wrong?
* Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-10 09:17:54 +0100]: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:20:26PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > So python-docutils-writers-odtwriter would be the right name in theory, > > but this doesn't make sense, indeed. > > Does anybody insist on that name? If not, I’m going to update the long > description to mention the relationship to python-docutils, which > probably would have avoided that bug report in the first place. Personally, I think that package name is ludicrous; python-odtwriter seems fine, this kind of "extend another package" package is an exceptional case, so I think it makes sense to bend the naming rules a little. -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [python-odtwriter] package name wrong?
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:20:26PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > So python-docutils-writers-odtwriter would be the right name in theory, > but this doesn't make sense, indeed. Does anybody insist on that name? If not, I’m going to update the long description to mention the relationship to python-docutils, which probably would have avoided that bug report in the first place. Cheers, -- Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
