Re: pyxdg 0.23
* Thomas Kluyver , 2012-07-30, 19:36: The attached diff updates pyxdg with a new upstream version, which includes Python 3 support (bug #591017). I'm not sure of the etiquette for doing this sort of thing. Should I contact the list (like this), directly contact the individual named as the uploader - in this case, Piotr Lewandowski - or commit the changes to the team SVN repository and then ask for review? If the team is in the Maintainer field, you are invited to commit and upload stuff yourself. However, in case of big or controversial changes (*cough* #654978 *cough*) it's still a good idea to ask the human maintainer(s) first. From a quick look at the diff: + rm -rf *.egg-info This looks like a no-op to me. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731070252.ga...@jwilk.net
Re: pyxdg 0.23
On 31 July 2012 08:02, Jakub Wilk wrote: > If the team is in the Maintainer field, you are invited to commit and upload > stuff yourself. However, in case of big or controversial changes (*cough* > #654978 *cough*) it's still a good idea to ask the human maintainer(s) > first. Do these changes count as big? By the standards of packaging, it's a fairly substantial set of changes, including adding a new binary package. But it's not changing much that should affect users, just packaging a new upstream release. >> + rm -rf *.egg-info > > This looks like a no-op to me. Thanks, I'll remove that line. Are there other cases where it is needed? I got it from http://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide Best wishes, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caovn4qigrckmdlcbgwjg6bdxua_byn_yyp4a6umecfh4sfz...@mail.gmail.com
