On 01/22/2014 07:39 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 22.01.2014 08:28, schrieb Thomas Goirand:
>> On 01/22/2014 12:24 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> Do you really think that it's unfeasible for git proponents on this team to
>>> find the necessary resources to plan an orderly en mass transition? It
>>> might
>>> indeed be so, we're all busy. But let's hopefully all agree that the end
>>> goal
>>> is to have all team-maintained packages in the same vcs.
>>
>> I can't answer this question, as I can't speak for the others, and I
>> don't have time myself.
>
> sure, so you are proposing something which you don't want to finish, just
> pursuing a rather selfish interest of using git yourself. You did try this
> with
> the debian-java team as well.
I don't think so. I don't maintain any Java package.
>> Well, if we decide to move slowly things to Git, then the packages that
>> will stay in the SVN repo will be those largely unmaintained...
>
> and these will be magically maintained when converted to Git?
I guess, not more than with SVN...
> please don't be silly.
I don't think I have. You are making wrong assumptions here, I believe.
> unmaintained packages are not a property of the used VCS.
Agreed!!!
> And you said
> you don't have time to spend on these yourself.
>
>> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>> The only reason they are maintained within the OpenStack team is because
>> I don't want to be forced to use SVN, and I think it's safer than in
>> collab-maint where so many people have commit access (which means they
>> can rm -rf...).
>
> apparently these were first needed for openstack. so it seems to make sense to
> maintain these over there.
That's truth only for a subset of them, not all of them. Many are of
general purpose.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52dfca83.7020...@debian.org
