Re: Bug#883529: Buildbot maintenance by PAPT
2018-03-26, Piotr Ożarowski: > great, just let me know if you accept our policy and I'll hit the button Yes, I accept the Debian Python Policy: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ > (BTW, dh-python should be ready for builbot now, let me know if you need > more changes) Awesome, I'll check it ASAP. Thanks! -- Robin
Re: packages that use dh_python{2,3} but don't depend on dh-python
[Matthias Klose, 2018-03-27] > yes. please see below for a description of such packages. Or you might share > the > approach how you did construct those lists you posted. I used codesearch.d.n¹, then downloaded JSON representation of that search² and removed all packages that Build-Depend on dh-python from this³ list in Python. [¹] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=dh_python3|--with[%3D+].*python3+path%3Adebian%2Frules [²] curl -s https://codesearch.debian.net/results/216977478aa5db9e/packages.json | jq -r '.Packages[]' [³] grep-dctrl -n -w -F Build-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep -s Package dh-python /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources -- GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
Re: packages that use dh_python{2,3} but don't depend on dh-python
On 27.03.2018 18:39, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Matthias Klose, 2018-03-27] >> On 26.03.2018 19:32, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here's a list of packages that will FTBFS soon if dh-python will not be >>> added to Build-Depends (it's time to drop dh-python from python3's >>> Depends and old version of dh_python2 from python package). >>> >>> http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.list >>> http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.ddlist >>> http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.list >>> http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.ddlist >>> >>> The plan is to report bugs first and follow up with changes in -defaults >>> packages in April or May. >> >> These lists have way to many false positives. So please, don't file bug >> reports >> before checking these manually. > > can you name some so that I can try to figure out what went wrong? yes. please see below for a description of such packages. Or you might share the approach how you did construct those lists you posted. >> You have to exclude all these source packages using python/python3 as a b-d >> only >> and which don't build any binary packages without any python/python3 >> dependency >> in the packages, e.g. gcc-defaults. > > gcc-defaults is not a false positive, it calls `dh_python2 -plibgcj-common` > but doesn't > depend on dh-python well, this one not anymore.
Re: packages that use dh_python{2,3} but don't depend on dh-python
[Matthias Klose, 2018-03-27] > On 26.03.2018 19:32, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here's a list of packages that will FTBFS soon if dh-python will not be > > added to Build-Depends (it's time to drop dh-python from python3's > > Depends and old version of dh_python2 from python package). > > > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.list > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.ddlist > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.list > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.ddlist > > > > The plan is to report bugs first and follow up with changes in -defaults > > packages in April or May. > > These lists have way to many false positives. So please, don't file bug > reports > before checking these manually. can you name some so that I can try to figure out what went wrong? > You have to exclude all these source packages using python/python3 as a b-d > only > and which don't build any binary packages without any python/python3 > dependency > in the packages, e.g. gcc-defaults. gcc-defaults is not a false positive, it calls `dh_python2 -plibgcj-common` but doesn't depend on dh-python -- GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
Re: packages that use dh_python{2,3} but don't depend on dh-python
On 26.03.2018 19:32, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a list of packages that will FTBFS soon if dh-python will not be > added to Build-Depends (it's time to drop dh-python from python3's > Depends and old version of dh_python2 from python package). > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.list > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.ddlist > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.list > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.ddlist > > The plan is to report bugs first and follow up with changes in -defaults > packages in April or May. These lists have way to many false positives. So please, don't file bug reports before checking these manually. You have to exclude all these source packages using python/python3 as a b-d only and which don't build any binary packages without any python/python3 dependency in the packages, e.g. gcc-defaults. Matthias
Re: packages that use dh_python{2,3} but don't depend on dh-python
Hi, 2018-03-26 17:03 GMT+02:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel < frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>: > What about teaching cme how to fix packages build-depends. > or just mass-commit it inside DPMT/PAPT/OpenStack Team, which is vast majority of Python packages :). -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
Re: Request to join the PAPT
Le lundi 26 mars 2018 à 23:37:06+0200, Piotr Ożarowski a écrit : > [Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2018-03-18] > > After hanging around a lot in DPMT, I'm currently packaging an app that > > henceforth would definitely find its place into PAPT namespace on salsa. > > > > I'll commit myself to follow the PAPT policy. :) > > > > My salsa login is peb-guest > > you're in, welcome :) Thanks a lot! -- Pierre-Elliott Bécue GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528 F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2 It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Joining the Debian Python Modules team
Hi Piotr, Пн 26 мар 2018 @ 23:11 Piotr Ożarowski: > [Lev Lamberov, 2018-03-12] >> My Alioth/Salsa login is, well, dogsleg. > > done :) Thanks! Could be so kind and "upgrade" my status to Master? Without it I simply cannot create a new project or transfer any existing project to the DPMT Salsa namespace. With regards, Lev