Bug#896557: ITP: python-django-nocaptcha-recaptcha -- Google No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA widget for Django forms

2018-04-22 Thread Alexandros Afentoulis
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandros Afentoulis 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org

* Package name: python-django-nocaptcha-recaptcha
  Version : 0.0.20
  Upstream Author : Imaginary Landscape 
* URL :
https://github.com/ImaginaryLandscape/django-nocaptcha-recaptcha
* License : BSD
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : Google No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA widget for Django forms

This python module allows creating Django forms with Google's "No
CAPTCHA" reCAPTCHA or reCAPTCHA version 2. This is the only available
reCAPTCHA since Google switched off version 1 in March 2018.

This package is not a dependency for others, its building dependencies
are already satisfied and has no running dependencies to other python
modules.

I already have a working debian package, tested against oldstable and
Django 1.8. I plan on git pushing the repository on salsa as soon as
possible. I will need a sponsor to upload that package and I would
certainly maintain it within a team if that's more appropriate.



Re: Testing Django Packages, was: Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#896429: python3-django-tables2: django_tables2 fails to import

2018-04-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/21/2018 11:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I believe we could benefit from more documentation and perhaps tools to make 
> it easier to integrate tests for Django modules.
> 
> Scott K

I agree, and it would be nice to have it within within the
python-django-common package, so one could use it for tests.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)



Profile-guided optimisation / link-time optimisation in Buster

2018-04-22 Thread Matthew Woodcraft

I noticed that profile-guided optimisation and link-time optimisation
have both been unconditionally disabled in Buster's Python 3.6 and 3.7
packages, though 3.5 in Stretch had them both enabled (on common
platforms).

Can anyone tell me why this was done?


I see nothing about this in debian/changelog and the indentation in
debian/rules looks odd, so I'm wondering if it might even have been an
unintentional change.


It's these extra lines in debian/rules:

   with_pgo =
   with_lto =

just before the
 ifeq ($(with_lto),yes)
line.


-M-