Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 08:18:41 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > > Thanks, yes, that prevents the install of the "old" > > gobject-introspection with the new python3 from experimental. > > Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight (I blame post-FOSDEM illness). That > isn't actually what you need if you want to port to python3.8 Actually, no, I just wanted to prevent it FTBFSing when the default changes and gobject-introspection wasn't yet rebuilt. LibreOffice also only builds dor the default. (With a shitload of hackery it is possible to build pyuno twice/thrice etc. but given there*s a LO part of it this will not be coinstallable, defeating the purpose.) Regards, Rene
Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 08:18:41 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > Thanks, yes, that prevents the install of the "old" > gobject-introspection with the new python3 from experimental. Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight (I blame post-FOSDEM illness). That isn't actually what you need if you want to port to python3.8 - it won't support python3.8 until the binNMUs for this transition happen. If you need a python3.8 version of gobject-introspection before then, you could maybe NMU it into experimental? I *think* Build-Depends: python3-dev (>= 3.8) should do what you'd need, but don't necessarily trust my technical judgement right now! smcv
Re: influxdb-python FTBFS with pandas 0.25.3
- Mail original - > De: "andreas" > À: 950...@bugs.debian.org, "debian-python" , > "Alexandre Viau" > Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Février 2020 09:36:27 > Objet: Re: influxdb-python FTBFS with pandas 0.25.3 > Hi Alexandre, > > since a Debian Med package is affected as reverse-depends of > influxdb-python I had a look. Unfortunately this Python package > is not maintained by the Python modules team. I would consider > it a good idea to move this package into team maintenance. I'd > volunteer to do that move but wanted to ask for permission first. > problem is pandas seems to have broken things with last/recent update. influx does not seem to have fixed panda issues for now and sticks to older panda version requirement, which is fine from python point of view (getting the expected version), but being an issue for Debian taking only last one. +1 for moving it to python if they do agree... regarding biomaj which depends on influxdb, I think I will workaround issue during our sprint and patch program to remove temporarily the requirement (not closing bug but lowering severity, thiswas already done in the past before influx package was available). Olivier > If you argee I would upgrade the package to 5.2.3 despite I > realised that there are open issues > >https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb-python/issues/738 > and >https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb-python/issues/696 > > Could you please comment on these? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de
Re: influxdb-python FTBFS with pandas 0.25.3
Hi Alexandre, since a Debian Med package is affected as reverse-depends of influxdb-python I had a look. Unfortunately this Python package is not maintained by the Python modules team. I would consider it a good idea to move this package into team maintenance. I'd volunteer to do that move but wanted to ask for permission first. If you argee I would upgrade the package to 5.2.3 despite I realised that there are open issues https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb-python/issues/738 and https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb-python/issues/696 Could you please comment on these? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
