Re: RFH: Problemas with test process on python-jsonrpc-server
did you run the -v option, as suggested by the error? it may lead to what the problem is On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 7:03 PM Pablo Mestre wrote: > > Hi, > > Im trying to packages python-jsonrpc-server to solve the dependencies > for upgrade Python IDE Spyder. > > I get this issue with the test process and I dont find any solution at > the moment: > > https://github.com/palantir/python-jsonrpc-server/issues/43 > > The problem is only with python version 3.8 > > Any idea how i can solve this issue > > The salsa repo is > https://salsa.debian.org/elMor3no-guest/python-jsonrpc-server > > Thanks in advance > > Pablo > > -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
RFH: Problemas with test process on python-jsonrpc-server
Hi, Im trying to packages python-jsonrpc-server to solve the dependencies for upgrade Python IDE Spyder. I get this issue with the test process and I dont find any solution at the moment: https://github.com/palantir/python-jsonrpc-server/issues/43 The problem is only with python version 3.8 Any idea how i can solve this issue The salsa repo is https://salsa.debian.org/elMor3no-guest/python-jsonrpc-server Thanks in advance Pablo
Re: Request to join DPMT
Luca, > I have read and accept the policy.rst - if accepted, I will update the > branch policy of my modules to match the policy (mainly > s|debian/sid|debian/master|) and update the Maintainer field, > everything else already matches. In your request to join email, you agreed to accept and follow our policy, and adapt your packages to it. sadly that did not happen: all your packages lack both `upstream` and `pristine-tar` branches, and they still have `debian/sid` as main branch (which would be fine, but you said you'd change it). Please rectify the situation. Regards, -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Re: mercurial switch to python3 in debian unstable - July 16th, 2020
> I guess a lot of things are unlocked now. I wonder how we can help > fixing what's remaining. I think i already took care of all the packages that got (recursively) freed up by switching mercurial to python3. > Please do share your thoughts on that. I guess one can always look at http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html for some work regarding the py2removal effort -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Re: mercurial switch to python3 in debian unstable - July 16th, 2020
On 7/16/20 9:48 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> If we dont hear otherwise, we plan to upload the python3 version of >> mercurial in unstable on or around next Thursday, July 16th. > > mercurial/5.4.1-2 has just been uploaded to unstable, switching it to > use python3. > > Regards, Thanks a lot for your work, on this specifically, and on the Python 2 removal in general. I guess a lot of things are unlocked now. I wonder how we can help fixing what's remaining. Please do share your thoughts on that. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Re: joining team / salsa access
Hi, čt 16. 7. 2020 v 15:30 odesílatel Jojo napsal: > I'd like to join the debian python modules and application teams welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
Re: Request to join python-team
Hi, pá 17. 7. 2020 v 4:01 odesílatel Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro < francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net> napsal: > My name is Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro, I would like to be part of the > team welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
Re: The python command in Debian
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:35:03AM +0200, deba...@debian.org wrote: > > Yup, Arch does. From the wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python > > > > Any program requiring Python 2 needs to point to /usr/bin/python2, instead > > of > > /usr/bin/python, which points to Python 3. > > I wonder, what they do, if there will be a Python 4... AFAIK Python 4 is not planned even in long term (e.g. because that would break a lot of programs that rely on sys.version_info.major): https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0602/ -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: The python command in Debian
On 2020-07-18 10:26, Sebastian Humenda wrote: > Rene Engelhard schrieb am 18.07.2020, 8:26 +0200: > >Do some distros set /usr/bin/python to python 3? > > Yup, Arch does. From the wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python > > Any program requiring Python 2 needs to point to /usr/bin/python2, instead of > /usr/bin/python, which points to Python 3. I wonder, what they do, if there will be a Python 4...
Re: The python command in Debian
Hi Rene Engelhard schrieb am 18.07.2020, 8:26 +0200: >Am 14.07.20 um 11:00 schrieb Piotr Ożarowski: >> FTR: I didn't change my mind. /usr/bin/python is still used outside >> Debian packages, in /usr/local/bin scripts and applications and I >> strongly disagree to touch it. > >Unfortunately (at least if I remember correctly I came up with an >example of this lately...) also new stuff does #!/usr/bin/python and >assumes it is python3... > > >Do some distros set /usr/bin/python to python 3? Yup, Arch does. From the wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python Any program requiring Python 2 needs to point to /usr/bin/python2, instead of /usr/bin/python, which points to Python 3. Cheers Sebastian signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: The python command in Debian
Hi, Am 14.07.20 um 11:00 schrieb Piotr Ożarowski: > FTR: I didn't change my mind. /usr/bin/python is still used outside > Debian packages, in /usr/local/bin scripts and applications and I > strongly disagree to touch it. Unfortunately (at least if I remember correctly I came up with an example of this lately...) also new stuff does #!/usr/bin/python and assumes it is python3... Do some distros set /usr/bin/python to python 3? Honestly, I think /usr/local/bin scripts then should simply be fixed by the admin. It's not as if they had years to do so. Regards, Rene
