Re: Request to join the team
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021, Athos Ribeiro wrote: Hi, I am Athos Ribeiro and I would like to join the Python team. At this moment, I would like to start by helping to add Python 3.10 support to some packages that may be FTBFS for Python 3.10 (which may help with the upcoming transition). I already started with the following packages https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/unittest2/-/merge_requests/1 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyscss/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-werkzeug/-/merge_requests/2 Some of them may unblock a few other packages which may be FTBFS with Python 3.10. I will also use this opportunity to ask for sponsorship on the packages listed above :) Hi Athos and welcome! Hi Scott, I can't add you to the group, but I uploaded the packages above. Thanks for your work. Thank you for the uploads! I am adding a few more MRs I filed in salsa here in case Scott or someone else is feeling like sponsoring some of them. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-leather/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-agate/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyscss/-/merge_requests/3 https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/testresources/-/merge_requests/3 While this last one is under the OpenStack team, it is a build dep for other packages under the Python team, so I also threw it in the list just in case. For the first two, I ended up uploading new upstream releases since those patches were already incorporated upstream. I'm not a member of the OpenStack team so I can't help with that last one. Thanks, Scott
Status of python-charset-normalizer in Debian
Hello Dominik, can you update the DPT on the status of python-charset-normalizer? it used to be in NEW, but now i cant find it there and it's not in the archive. This package is needed at least by httpx, which cannot be upgraded to its latest version, thus preventing a growing set of packages to be upgraded, many of them becoming RC and in danger of being removed from testing. Thanks, -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Re: Request to join the team
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:42PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 9 Nov 2021, Athos Ribeiro wrote: Hi, I am Athos Ribeiro and I would like to join the Python team. At this moment, I would like to start by helping to add Python 3.10 support to some packages that may be FTBFS for Python 3.10 (which may help with the upcoming transition). I already started with the following packages https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/unittest2/-/merge_requests/1 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyscss/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-werkzeug/-/merge_requests/2 Some of them may unblock a few other packages which may be FTBFS with Python 3.10. I will also use this opportunity to ask for sponsorship on the packages listed above :) Hi Athos and welcome! Hi Scott, I can't add you to the group, but I uploaded the packages above. Thanks for your work. Thank you for the uploads! I am adding a few more MRs I filed in salsa here in case Scott or someone else is feeling like sponsoring some of them. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-leather/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-agate/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyscss/-/merge_requests/3 https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/testresources/-/merge_requests/3 While this last one is under the OpenStack team, it is a build dep for other packages under the Python team, so I also threw it in the list just in case. Scott -- Athos Ribeiro
Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))
On 11/11/21 1:33 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Thomas! > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >>> If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2, >>> pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF >>> in a few weeks when I have more time. >>> >>> -- >>> Dmitry Shachnev >> >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts? > > Yes, this idea was present in my original mail you quoted here :) > > I intend to do it at some point, but I can't yet say when it will happen. Yes, but your original idea was to kick nose out of Debian before we get the chance to fix. I believe it'd be nicer to do the MBF even if we keep nose for a while, which is why I wrote about it again, as I didn't know what your intention was. Very good if you still have it in mind then! It'd be very useful to me at least (as many of the package I contribute may be affected and it's hard to have a vision of it without the MBF). Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))
Hi Thomas! On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2, > > pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF > > in a few weeks when I have more time. > > > > -- > > Dmitry Shachnev > > Hi, > > I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts? Yes, this idea was present in my original mail you quoted here :) I intend to do it at some point, but I can't yet say when it will happen. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))
On 2021-11-11 11:04:10 +0100 (+0100), Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: [...] > > I intend to do a MBF in a few weeks when I have more time. > > I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. [...] He does say right there, "I intend to do a MBF," so I assumed that's been the plan all along? Or are you asking why it hasn't been started now that it's been a few weeks? -- Jeremy Stanley signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))
On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2, > pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF > in a few weeks when I have more time. > > -- > Dmitry Shachnev Hi, I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: I'm not volunteering for doing it, just giving the idea...
