Python Team Sprint: poll to find best dates (deadline, September 10th)

2022-08-29 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau

Thanks to everyone who replied [1].

I think there is enough interest for this to be worth organising. Here's 
a poll to find the best dates for the sprint:


https://deb.li/38VrF

There are only 2 options, Oct 28-29-30 & December 2-3-4. We could have a 
pretty long debate on dates, but I'm making it simple by restricting it 
to those 2 options :)


Please answer the poll before September 10th if you are interested in 
participating.


Once we have a date, I'll create a proper wiki page.

Cheers,

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2022/08/threads.html#00052

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄



OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Joining the team

2022-08-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi!

I'd like to join the debian-python team to help with general QA work on
all packages.

My salsa login is ema.

I have read the policy [1] and accept it.

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst



Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained
> since 2015 [2][3].
>
> The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to
> nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python standard library [6]. There is
> a script called nose2pytest [7] which can assist with migrating from nose to
> pytest.
>
> nose has a Python 2 code base and it is difficult to keep it in working state
> for new Python versions. It will probably become impossible after Python 3.13,
> where lib2to3 will be removed [8].
>
> In Debian sid, we still have 389 packages which either build-depend on nose or
> use it in autopkgtests. I propose to file bugs for them asking to switch to a
> supported alternative. A dd-list is attached.

Thanks to everyone who replied!

MBF is now done and bugs can be seen here:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=nose-rm

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature