Re: New upstream version for python-pint
I've packaged font-awesome5 at work, for sure it's not in Debian. The upgrade to v5 was rightfully reverted but it's in limbo since. https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-font-awesome fonts-font-awesome (5.0.10+really4.7.0~dfsg-4.1) <-- Please note that this package provides Font Awesome 4 (not Font Awesome 5 or Font Awesome 6 which are different fonts with different licensing). Le lun. 1 avr. 2024 à 21:26, Antonio Valentino a écrit : > > Dear Thomas, > > Il 01/04/24 17:52, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: > > On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote: > >> Dear Thomas, > >> > >> Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: > >>> On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: > Dear Thomas and Ondřej, > a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in > python-pint (#1067318). > I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should > be sufficient to fix the issue. > > If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream > version in the salsa. > Of course I will let to you the review and upload. > > Please let me know, > > > kind regards > >>> > >>> Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. > >>> > >>> Thomas > >> > >> Thanks Thomas > >> The packages is now updated in salsa. > >> Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to > >> reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. > >> I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would > >> prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. > >> > >> Could you please review and upload? > >> > >> I have also put myself as uploader. > >> I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as > >> described in [3]. > >> > >> > >> kind regards > > > > Hi! > > > > Thanks for the work Antonio. > > > > 1/ In the clean target, please also clean: > > - Pint.egg-info > > - docs/savefig > > > > 2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright". > > > > 3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides > > overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from > > system instead? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > 1/ and 2/ are now fixed > > For 3/ I indeed did a quick search but I was not able to find a font > package providing the needed fonts > > $ apt-file search fa-brands-400.ttf > gnunet: > /usr/share/doc/gnunet/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > icinga-php-library: > /usr/share/icinga-php/ipl/asset/static/font/awesome/fa-brands-400.ttf > node-fortawesome-fontawesome-free: > /usr/share/nodejs/@fortawesome/fontawesome-free/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf > ntopng-data: > /usr/share/ntopng/httpdocs/fontawesome-free-5.11.2-web/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf > omnidb-common: > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/OmniDB_app/static/OmniDB_app/lib/fa/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf > petsc3.18-doc: > /usr/share/doc/petsc3.18-doc/docs/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > petsc3.19-doc: > /usr/share/doc/petsc3.19-doc/docs/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-astroplan-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-astroplan-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-astropy-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-astropy-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-blosc-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-blosc-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-cogent-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-cogent-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-dask-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-dask-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-distributed-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-distributed-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-django-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-django-doc/html/_static/fontawesome/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-h5netcdf-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-h5netcdf-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-imageio-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-imageio-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-md-toc-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-md-toc-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-mpl-sphinx-theme-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-mpl-sphinx-theme-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-nbformat-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-nbformat-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-pandas-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-pandas-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-pyqtgraph-doc: > /usr/share/doc/python-pyqtgraph-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz > python-pystac-doc: >
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
Dear Thomas, Il 01/04/24 17:52, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas, Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. Thomas Thanks Thomas The packages is now updated in salsa. Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. Could you please review and upload? I have also put myself as uploader. I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described in [3]. kind regards Hi! Thanks for the work Antonio. 1/ In the clean target, please also clean: - Pint.egg-info - docs/savefig 2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright". 3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from system instead? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) 1/ and 2/ are now fixed For 3/ I indeed did a quick search but I was not able to find a font package providing the needed fonts $ apt-file search fa-brands-400.ttf gnunet: /usr/share/doc/gnunet/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz icinga-php-library: /usr/share/icinga-php/ipl/asset/static/font/awesome/fa-brands-400.ttf node-fortawesome-fontawesome-free: /usr/share/nodejs/@fortawesome/fontawesome-free/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf ntopng-data: /usr/share/ntopng/httpdocs/fontawesome-free-5.11.2-web/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf omnidb-common: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/OmniDB_app/static/OmniDB_app/lib/fa/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf petsc3.18-doc: /usr/share/doc/petsc3.18-doc/docs/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz petsc3.19-doc: /usr/share/doc/petsc3.19-doc/docs/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-astroplan-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-astroplan-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-astropy-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-astropy-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-blosc-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-blosc-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-cogent-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-cogent-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-dask-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-dask-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-distributed-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-distributed-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-django-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-django-doc/html/_static/fontawesome/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-h5netcdf-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-h5netcdf-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-imageio-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-imageio-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-md-toc-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-md-toc-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-mpl-sphinx-theme-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-mpl-sphinx-theme-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-nbformat-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-nbformat-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-pandas-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-pandas-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-pyqtgraph-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-pyqtgraph-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-pystac-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-pystac-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-scipy-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-scipy-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-silx-doc: /usr/share/doc/python3-silx/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-skimage-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-skimage-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-sphinx-copybutton-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-sphinx-copybutton-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-terminado-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-terminado-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-traitlets-doc:
Re: Requests to join DPT haven't been processed for months
Hi Christian, Thanks for investigating & raising this! Op Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:45:20PM +0200 schreef Christian Kastner: > > one of the GSoC candidates I'm mentoring hasn't had his request to join > the team processed for a month. I then checked and unless I'm mistaken, > *no*( requests filed in 2024 have been processed. At least, all threads > I could find are as of yet unanswered. > > Some of the requests were already accompanied by contributions, so it > would be a extra shame to have these contributors move on. > > Is there any way I (or anyone else) can help with this? See https://salsa.debian.org/groups/python-team/packages/-/group_members?sort=access_level_desc . : we have 5 "owners" in python-team/packages , and lots of "maintainer"s . IIRC only owners can add new maintainers or developers. (Please correct me if I'm wrong here.) Hope this helps. (Sorry, I lack the time to do more on this (pretty painful!) problem). Bye, Joost
Requests to join DPT haven't been processed for months
Hi, one of the GSoC candidates I'm mentoring hasn't had his request to join the team processed for a month. I then checked and unless I'm mistaken, *no*( requests filed in 2024 have been processed. At least, all threads I could find are as of yet unanswered. Some of the requests were already accompanied by contributions, so it would be a extra shame to have these contributors move on. Is there any way I (or anyone else) can help with this? Best, Christian
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas, Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. Thomas Thanks Thomas The packages is now updated in salsa. Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. Could you please review and upload? I have also put myself as uploader. I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described in [3]. kind regards Hi! Thanks for the work Antonio. 1/ In the clean target, please also clean: - Pint.egg-info - docs/savefig 2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright". 3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from system instead? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Re: Uscan: watch and changelog
Dear Paul, thanks for your feedback. On 2024-03-31 17:17 Paul Boddie wrote: > then the developers claim that they didn't have time to document That is the advantage when doing FOSS. You do have the time. There is not boss or customer behind your back. Teh problem in FOSS is just the priorities of the developers and their management of time and resources. > Did you find my previous message about > uscan helpful? Yes, I did. > > The situation is not healthy to me. So I need to stop from here with > > fixing other peoples documentation. > > I think that you can make a difference, so don't stop trying to do > something about it. One important skill of a FOSS developer/contributor is to know when to stop and saying "no". Anyway, I also think I won't make a difference when the whole system (Debian) is against me. There is much more to do then just updating wiki pages. I do respect the docracy but there are limits. And that is where the project management should be somehow involved.
