python-tornado version for squeeze : freeze exception?

2010-09-03 Thread Jon Dowland
Hi folks,

I package a backup tool called "bup", recent versions of
which embed a copy of the tornado library (a git commit
somewhere between 0.2, in testing, and 1.0.1, in unstable).

I am exploring the possibility of a freeze exception for a
more recent version of bup than currently in the archive.
Ideally, I would excise the embedded copy of tornado and
depend on python-tornado.

Unfortunately, bup will not work as-is with python-tornado
version 0.2 currently in testing. It seems fine with 1.0.1
in sid.

Therefore, if I upload a newer bup and get a freeze
exception, I can only depend on python-tornado if 1.0.1 also
gets a freeze exception: otherwise, I will have to carry the
embedded copy, which will be newer than the package!

Are you folks considering a freeze exception request for
python-tornado?


Many thanks,

-- 
Jon Dowland
please copy replies to me.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?

2006-01-20 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:58:20PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> For what it's worth, we've caught hell from the ruby community for
> breaking the standard library in to its component parts and not
> installing it all by default. This problem has been largely abrogated
> as of late, but I'd rather not see us piss off the python community
> for making a similar mistake.

I believe the problem with the ruby situation wasn't that the monolithic
ruby distribution was split up; but that there was no clear way to
install the lot in one go, without prior knowledge of what the whole
distribution was: a simple meta-package with the correct dependencies
was all that was missing.

-- 
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]