Re: ITP: skype4py -- Skype API wrapper for Python
* Piotr Ożarowski [2009-02-18 14:37]: > [Rafael Laboissiere, 2009-02-18] > > I just filed a request to join the DPMT at Alioth, but I am not sure it is > > enough. Please, add me (alioth login: rafael) to the team. > > I will add you to the team this evening, [...] Thanks. > [...] you have commit rights already as you're a DD. Sure, I have forgot about this. I have already committed the skype4py Debian files and made the necessary changes for uploading the package to unstable. David, could you please take a look at what I did? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: ITP: skype4py -- Skype API wrapper for Python
* David Spreen [2009-02-17 08:40]: > Package: wnpp > Owner: David Spreen > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: skype4py > Version : 1.0.31.1 > Upstream Author : Arkadiusz Wahlig > * URL or Web page : https://developer.skype.com/wiki/Skype4Py > * License : BSD Style License > Description : Skype API wrapper for Python > Category : contrib > > I intend to co-maintain skype4py (the binary package is called > python-skype) with Rafael Laboissiere , who > prepared unofficial packages at http://alioth.debian.org/~rafael/skype/. > We plan to do this within the Debian Python Modules Team, if the team > agrees. > > The packages above need some work, particularly the copyright file > points to the wrong license and the author is not mentioned. Moreover, > the package needs to be updated to the newest version. > > If DPMT is okay with this, Rafael would like to transfer the package > into the team svn so we can begin the work. I just filed a request to join the DPMT at Alioth, but I am not sure it is enough. Please, add me (alioth login: rafael) to the team. Thanks, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
RFP: python-glpk -- Python binding to the GLPK library
package glpk reassign 400690 wnpp retitle RFP: python-glpk -- Python binding to the GLPK library thanks The following bug has been filed against the glpk package: * Jeff Abrahamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-27 20:30]: > Package: glpk > Version: 4.11-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > python-glpk seems to be a decent set of python bindings to glpk. > > It would be helpful to add it to the debian glpk package. However, we think that adding extra code to the glpk source package is not appropriate. Actually, python-glpk should be packaged separately. we are then reassigning this bug report to wnpp and transforming it into an RFP. The upstream sources can be found at [1] and are released under the GPL. 1. http://www.ncc.up.pt/~jpp/code/python-glpk/ -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New upload of python-plplot, hopefully Policy-compliant
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 11:16]: > * Python Transition Mass bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 10:43]: > > > This bug is part of a mass bug filling, and its severity will be > > raised to serious when python will default to python2.4. Please note > > that this bug (even not being RC) falls under the 0-day NMU policy. > > Whoever is considering doing an NMU to fix this bug: please, wait until > plplot_5.6.1-1 enters unstable. This version of the package is sitting > at the NEW queue waiting for ftp-admin approval. Okay, plplot_5.6.1-1 has been accepted in unstable. I already uploaded version 5.6.1-2 which contains the necessary changes for adapting python-plplot to the new Policy. The trickiest part was to configure/make/install the upstream sources for both python2.3 and python2.4. At any event, since I not very familiar with Python (neither with the Python modules/extensions packaging practices), I would appreciate if some Python guru could review my changes. Thanks, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Python 2.3 transition completed in testing
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-15 02:26]: > A version of python2.3 that sets the default python version to 2.3 has > been accepted into testing. It should now be safe to upload python > packages that were previously in a mini-freeze. Good work. Congratulations to all the people involved in this task. -- Rafael
Re: undefined PyArg_GetString
As regards my last message to this list, I forgot to ask to Cc: replies directly to me, as I am not subscribed to debian-python. Cheers, -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UPRESS A CNRS 5009 / INPG | Voice: +33 4.76.57.48.49 46, av. Felix Viallet | Fax: +33 4.76.57.47.10 F-38031 Grenoble CEDEX 1 France | URL: http://www.icp.inpg.fr/~rafael
undefined PyArg_GetString
Hi folks, I am hurrying up to get my plplot packages done before slink freezes, but I am running into problems with my python-plplot package (presently at version 4.99j-3). When I run any example script, I get: $ python /usr/doc/plplot/examples/python/x01.py Traceback (innermost last): File "/usr/doc/plplot/examples/python/x01.py", line 12, in ? from pl import * ImportError: /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/plmodule.so: undefined symbol: PyArg_GetString I do not know where the symbol `PyArg_GetString' comes from. Any suggestion/fix? Thanks in advance, -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UPRESS A CNRS 5009 / INPG | Voice: +33 4.76.57.48.49 46, av. Felix Viallet | Fax: +33 4.76.57.47.10 F-38031 Grenoble CEDEX 1 France | URL: http://www.icp.inpg.fr/~rafael