Re: skimage (was: Re: Bug#729956: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas)
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > > Looking at python3-skimage-lib (which also requires a rebuild), it seems > > that the package failed to pass some tests. > > Bug #868582 even includes a patch to update to 0.13 [and disables some > > test failures]. > Has anyone had a chance to look at skimage btw? my bad will look into updating skimage now. thanks for the buzz -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
skimage (was: Re: Bug#729956: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas)
On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Looking at python3-skimage-lib (which also requires a rebuild), it seems > that the package failed to pass some tests. > > Bug #868582 even includes a patch to update to 0.13 [and disables some > test failures]. Has anyone had a chance to look at skimage btw?
Re: Bug#729956: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas
On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Diane Trout wrote: > I was assuming it's because there's a cyclic dependency between pandas > and statsmodels (needed for pandas unit tests), and statsmodels was > also broken by the fpectl problem. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875805 > > My solution was to use build-profiles to flag the test dependency with > !nocheck Looking at python3-skimage-lib (which also requires a rebuild), it seems that the package failed to pass some tests. Bug #868582 even includes a patch to update to 0.13 [and disables some test failures].
