Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Pablo Mestre]

El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
> []
> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
> owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
>
> If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
> #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
> python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
> relationship between the two bugs.
> []
>   Control: command -1 arguments
>
> "-1" is a convenient alias for the bug number.  For more info, see the
> man bts(1), the server-control documentation, and Developer's Reference:
>
>   https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/
>
>
> Cheers,
> Nicholas


New ITP submited https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964497
I hope to finish this package as soon as possible so that the Python IDE
Spyder process can continue to its
latest version.

Regards

Pablo

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Pablo Mestre]

Hi

Thanks for the update. I had problems sending the email.

El 7/5/20 a las 12:55 PM, Geert Stappers escribió:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of 
> the Language Server Protocol
> Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre 
> Control: subscribe -1
>
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
 Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too!
>>> [.]
 If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
 owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
>>> Yes, I committed to packaging
 If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
 #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
 python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
 relationship between the two bugs.
>>> You mean
>>>
>>> Control: block 946035 by -1
>>> Control: block #[newcode] by -1
>>>
>>> Something like this?
>>>
>> yes go ahead.
>>
>> I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help?
>>
> I felt the need to show how to do it.
>
>
>
 Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
 "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
 transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
 people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
 Postfix, Exim, etc.

 If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
>>> Ok
>>>
>>> Thanks for all
>>>
>>> P.
>>>
> @Pablo 
>
> My intension is to help.
> I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did.
>
> Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605
> can be easily updated again.
>
>
> Regards
> Geert Stappers

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Geert Stappers]

Control: retitle -1 ITP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the 
Language Server Protocol

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:55:58PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of 
> the Language Server Protocol

Oops.

Copy and paste error now fixed.

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Geert Stappers]

Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the 
Language Server Protocol
Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre 
Control: subscribe -1

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre  wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
> > > Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too!
> > [.]
> > > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
> > > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
> > Yes, I committed to packaging
> > > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
> > > #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
> > > python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
> > > relationship between the two bugs.
> >
> > You mean
> >
> > Control: block 946035 by -1
> > Control: block #[newcode] by -1
> >
> > Something like this?
> >
> 
> yes go ahead.
> 
> I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help?
> 

I felt the need to show how to do it.



> > >
> > > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
> > > "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
> > > transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
> > > people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
> > > Postfix, Exim, etc.
> > >
> > > If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
> > >   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
> >
> > Ok
> >
> > Thanks for all
> >
> > P.
> >

@Pablo 

My intension is to help.
I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did.

Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605
can be easily updated again.


Regards
Geert Stappers
-- 
Silence is hard to parse

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Nicholas D Steeves]

Hi Pablo,

Pablo Mestre  writes:

> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
>> Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! 
> [.]
>> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
>> owner of #96360[5], and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
> Yes, I committed to packaging
>> If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
>> #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
>> python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
>> relationship between the two bugs.
>
> You mean
>
> Control: block 946035 by -1

This blocks the spyder bug with the new bug, and is generally used
from the email that creates a new bug.  Hint: #963605 contains an example


Cheers,
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Emmanuel Arias]

Hi,


On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre  wrote:

> Hi
>
> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
> > Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too!
> [.]
> > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
> > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
> Yes, I committed to packaging
> > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
> > #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
> > python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
> > relationship between the two bugs.
>
> You mean
>
> Control: block 946035 by -1
> Control: block #[newcode] by -1
>
> Something like this?
>

yes go ahead.

I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help?

Cheers,
Emmanuel

>
> >
> > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
> > "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
> > transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
> > people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
> > Postfix, Exim, etc.
> >
> > If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
> >   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
>
> Ok
>
> Thanks for all
>
> P.
>
>
>

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Pablo Mestre]

Hi

El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
> Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! 
[.]
> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
> owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
Yes, I committed to packaging
> If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
> #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
> python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
> relationship between the two bugs.

You mean

Control: block 946035 by -1
Control: block #[newcode] by -1

Something like this?

>
> Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
> "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
> transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
> people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
> Postfix, Exim, etc.
>
> If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
>   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

Ok

Thanks for all

P.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Nicholas D Steeves]

Hi Pablo,

Pablo Mestre  writes:

> Im working on python-language-server

Awesome, thank you :-)  I expect it will be a popular package too!

> but looks like also depends on python-jsonrpc-server and I dont find
> any solution on Debian repositories.
>
> Any suggestion?
>

If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".

If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
#963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
relationship between the two bugs.

Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
"reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
Postfix, Exim, etc.

If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
  https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

If you use cont...@bugs.debian.org, please CC the bug's email.

It's also possible to reply to a bug with this magic control server
header:

  Control: command -1 arguments

"-1" is a convenient alias for the bug number.  For more info, see the
man bts(1), the server-control documentation, and Developer's Reference:

  https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/


Cheers,
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Pablo Mestre]

Im working on python-language-server but looks like also depends on
python-jsonrpc-server and I dont find any solution on Debian repositories.

Any suggestion?

p.

El 6/28/20 a las 11:04 AM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel escribió:
> What about helping 
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946035
>
>
> python-language-server
>
> is the only one missing now.
>
> cheers

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Otto Kekäläinen]

Hello!

I just wanted to chip in that I have been mentoring Pablo and he is
very committed and has already worked with several packages and is
proficient in using git, Salsa MR, Salsa CI etc workflow.

If you have some newcomer friendly or intermediate level tasks, please
get in touch with Pablo!

-- 
- Otto

Re: Offer to help with packaging

[Pablo Mestre]

Ok..
I will take a look

:)


El 6/28/20 a las 11:04 AM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel escribió:
> What about helping 
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946035
>
>
> python-language-server
>
> is the only one missing now.
>
> cheers

Offer to help with packaging

[Pablo Mestre]

Hello,

My name is Pablo Mestre and since last year I started the training
process to learn how to package for Debian with the sponsorship of Otto
Kekäläinen.

I currently maintain colortest-python[1], collaborate with
rdiff-backup[2] and I try to pack mystiq[3].

Now, I would like to know if there is any orphan package or that you are
needing help in which you can collaborate as a starter packer?

Regards,

Pablo


[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/colortest-python

[2] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/rdiff-backup

[3]https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mystiq