Re: RFS: filecheck
Hi! Uploaded! Thanks for you contribution to Debian :-) Cheers, Emmanuel On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 11:24:20PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 5:27 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:03:45PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > Hi！ > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my package! > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > > > > Hi team! > > > > > > > > > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking > > > > > > help > > > > > > to review/upload my new python package: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > > > > > > > > > TIA. > > > > > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm > > > > > going to review this package. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > Hi!, > > > > > > > > Me again. > > > > > > > > I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck > > > > > > > > * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in > > > > d/control. > > > Done. Here the ideal situation should be a docs package on there, but if > > > we use > > > sphinx-build to build its doc, there is one guzzle_sphinx_theme does > > > not in Debian. > > > So I package its manpage to binary package. > > > > OK. > > > > > > > > > * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of > > > > python3-poetry > > > Done. > > > > > > > * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, > > > > only in > > > > docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019. > > > Yeah, although there are only one file flaged its date on 2019, but > > > how to judge the > > > whole project copyright date range? I just follow its the first commit: > > > > > > https://github.com/mull-project/FileCheck.py/commits/main?after=195aa1527a2572b4697ae0d5c604f0baceba805c+419&branch=main&qualified_name=refs%2Fheads%2Fmain > > > > > > Not sure this is right. > > > > I'd just use 2019, not a range. > > Ok, done. > > > > > > > > > * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove > > > > it. > > > Sorry, I am not very clear about here. Do you mean here: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L30 > > > If yes, I think the synopsis solution should be more robust here. > > > Because it saves more space than > > > specially descriptions. > > > > > > please let me know if there is not true. > > > > Sorry, perhaps I was not clear, I mean remove the period at the end of > > line 20 [0]. > > Okay, done. :) > > > > > > > > > * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck? > > > You hint me here. So I spilted the origin package into python3 library > > > package and > > > its binary tool binary. this should be working. > > > > > > I have updated the package on salsa: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > > > Thanks again for reviewing the package! > > > > > > BR, > > > Bo > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > Bo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The rest looks good to me. > > Thanks. > I updated the package here: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/tree/debian/main/debian > > Thanks, > BR, > Bo > > > > [0] > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L20 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: filecheck
Hi! On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 5:27 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > Hi! > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:03:45PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > Hi！ > > > > Thanks for reviewing my package! > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > > > Hi team! > > > > > > > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking > > > > > help > > > > > to review/upload my new python package: > > > > > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > > > > > > > TIA. > > > > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm > > > > going to review this package. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > Hi!, > > > > > > Me again. > > > > > > I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck > > > > > > * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in > > > d/control. > > Done. Here the ideal situation should be a docs package on there, but if we > > use > > sphinx-build to build its doc, there is one guzzle_sphinx_theme does > > not in Debian. > > So I package its manpage to binary package. > > OK. > > > > > > * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of python3-poetry > > Done. > > > > > * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, only > > > in > > > docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019. > > Yeah, although there are only one file flaged its date on 2019, but > > how to judge the > > whole project copyright date range? I just follow its the first commit: > > > > https://github.com/mull-project/FileCheck.py/commits/main?after=195aa1527a2572b4697ae0d5c604f0baceba805c+419&branch=main&qualified_name=refs%2Fheads%2Fmain > > > > Not sure this is right. > > I'd just use 2019, not a range. Ok, done. > > > > > > * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove > > > it. > > Sorry, I am not very clear about here. Do you mean here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L30 > > If yes, I think the synopsis solution should be more robust here. > > Because it saves more space than > > specially descriptions. > > > > please let me know if there is not true. > > Sorry, perhaps I was not clear, I mean remove the period at the end of > line 20 [0]. Okay, done. :) > > > > > > * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck? > > You hint me here. So I spilted the origin package into python3 library > > package and > > its binary tool binary. this should be working. > > > > I have updated the package on salsa: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > Thanks again for reviewing the package! > > > > BR, > > Bo > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > Bo > > > > > > > > > > > > > The rest looks good to me. Thanks. I updated the package here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/tree/debian/main/debian Thanks, BR, Bo > > [0] > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L20
Re: RFS: filecheck
Hi! On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:03:45PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Hi！ > > Thanks for reviewing my package! > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > > Hi team! > > > > > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help > > > > to review/upload my new python package: > > > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > > > > > TIA. > > > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm > > > going to review this package. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Emmanuel > > > > Hi!, > > > > Me again. > > > > I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck > > > > * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in > > d/control. > Done. Here the ideal situation should be a docs package on there, but if we > use > sphinx-build to build its doc, there is one guzzle_sphinx_theme does > not in Debian. > So I package its manpage to binary package. OK. > > > * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of python3-poetry > Done. > > > * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, only in > > docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019. > Yeah, although there are only one file flaged its date on 2019, but > how to judge the > whole project copyright date range? I just follow its the first commit: > > https://github.com/mull-project/FileCheck.py/commits/main?after=195aa1527a2572b4697ae0d5c604f0baceba805c+419&branch=main&qualified_name=refs%2Fheads%2Fmain > > Not sure this is right. I'd just use 2019, not a range. > > > * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove it. > Sorry, I am not very clear about here. Do you mean here: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L30 > If yes, I think the synopsis solution should be more robust here. > Because it saves more space than > specially descriptions. > > please let me know if there is not true. Sorry, perhaps I was not clear, I mean remove the period at the end of line 20 [0]. > > > * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck? > You hint me here. So I spilted the origin package into python3 library > package and > its binary tool binary. this should be working. > > I have updated the package on salsa: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > Thanks again for reviewing the package! > > BR, > Bo > > > > Cheers, > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Bo > > > > > > > > The rest looks good to me. [0] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L20 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: filecheck
Hi！ Thanks for reviewing my package! On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > Hi team! > > > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help > > > to review/upload my new python package: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > > > TIA. > > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm > > going to review this package. > > > > Cheers, > > Emmanuel > > Hi!, > > Me again. > > I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck > > * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in > d/control. Done. Here the ideal situation should be a docs package on there, but if we use sphinx-build to build its doc, there is one guzzle_sphinx_theme does not in Debian. So I package its manpage to binary package. > * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of python3-poetry Done. > * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, only in > docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019. Yeah, although there are only one file flaged its date on 2019, but how to judge the whole project copyright date range? I just follow its the first commit: https://github.com/mull-project/FileCheck.py/commits/main?after=195aa1527a2572b4697ae0d5c604f0baceba805c+419&branch=main&qualified_name=refs%2Fheads%2Fmain Not sure this is right. > * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove it. Sorry, I am not very clear about here. Do you mean here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L30 If yes, I think the synopsis solution should be more robust here. Because it saves more space than specially descriptions. please let me know if there is not true. > * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck? You hint me here. So I spilted the origin package into python3 library package and its binary tool binary. this should be working. I have updated the package on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck Thanks again for reviewing the package! BR, Bo > > Cheers, > Emmanuel > > > > > > BR, > > > Bo > > > > >
Re: RFS: filecheck
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > Hi team! > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help > > to review/upload my new python package: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > TIA. > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm > going to review this package. > > Cheers, > Emmanuel Hi!, Me again. I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in d/control. * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of python3-poetry * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, only in docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019. * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove it. * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck? Cheers, Emmanuel > > > > BR, > > Bo > > signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: filecheck
Hi! On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Hi team! > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help > to review/upload my new python package: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > TIA. To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm going to review this package. Cheers, Emmanuel > > BR, > Bo > signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: filecheck
Hi team! Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help to review/upload my new python package: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck TIA. BR, Bo
