RFS: python-whisper (0.9.12)

2013-08-27 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello,

I have updated python-whisper to version 0.9.12. 

Package is available via svn:

http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-whisper/trunk/

Could any DD please review and if it fits upload the new package into Debian?

Thanks,
Jonas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130827225631.4b111...@swetlana.brachium-system.net



Re: RFS: python-whisper (0.9.10)

2012-06-04 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello,

 whisper-dump is not so important for whisper library.
 
 Fair enough. Uploaded.

thanks!

Jonas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120604114327.15051f0b@swetlana.internetstores.local



Re: RFS: python-whisper (0.9.10)

2012-06-03 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Jonas Genannt jonas.gena...@capi2name.de, 2012-06-02, 21:43:

In whisper-dump, lines 27 and 36, we have:

raise CorruptWhisperFile(...)

But no such exception is defined or imported. Perhaps it was meant to 
be whisper.CorruptWhisperFile? But whisper.CorruptWhisperFile 
constructor takes two arguments, not one.

I will submit an bug into upstream BTS.


Please do.


whisper-dump is not so important for whisper library.


Fair enough. Uploaded.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603192715.ga6...@jwilk.net



RFS: python-whisper (0.9.10)

2012-06-02 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello,

I have updated python-whisper to version 0.9.10. Package is lintian
clean.

Package is available via svn:

http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-whisper/trunk/

Could any DD please upload the new package into Debian?

Thanks,
Jonas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120602133621.2af35...@swetlana.brachium-system.net



Re: RFS: python-whisper (0.9.10)

2012-06-02 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Jonas Genannt jonas.gena...@capi2name.de, 2012-06-02, 13:36:

http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-whisper/trunk/


Typo in whisper-dump.py: reda - read.

Typo in debian/whisper-dump.1: whister - whisper.

In whisper.py, #!/usr/bin/env python has been moved to last line of 
the file. This is very odd. Is that intentional?


rename is provided by perl, so you should build-depend on it. (perl 
happens to be transitively build-essential, since dpkg-dev depends on 
it. But you shouldn't rely on that.) I would also tighten the regex by 
adding a $ at the end of it.


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120602170112.ga9...@jwilk.net



Re: RFS: python-whisper (0.9.10)

2012-06-02 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Jonas Genannt jonas.gena...@capi2name.de, 2012-06-02, 20:09:
In whisper.py, #!/usr/bin/env python has been moved to last line of 
the file. This is very odd. Is that intentional?

since whisper.py is only an library it should not hurt us.


Agreed. I only wanted you to ask upstream about the issue. Patching is 
specially for Debian would be overkill.


rename is provided by perl, so you should build-depend on it. (perl 
happens to be transitively build-essential, since dpkg-dev depends on 
it. But you shouldn't rely on that.) I would also tighten the regex by 
adding a $ at the end of it.
thanks, added the build dependency of perl. I think I don't need the $ 
at the regex, because I selected only *.py on the filepath.


But if .py existed both in the middle of filename and at the end of 
it, the wrong one would be stripped. But fair enough, it's unlikely to 
ever happen.


In whisper-dump, lines 27 and 36, we have:

raise CorruptWhisperFile(...)

But no such exception is defined or imported. Perhaps it was meant to be 
whisper.CorruptWhisperFile? But whisper.CorruptWhisperFile constructor 
takes two arguments, not one.


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120602182527.gb2...@jwilk.net



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2012-01-28 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Jonas Genannt jonas.gena...@capi2name.de, 2012-01-28, 14:45:

 * d/copyright: changed to DEP5

If you enable pedantic tags, lintian emits:
P: python-whisper source: out-of-date-copyright-format-uri
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=135


yes I know, but when I use http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ lintian 
tells me:


P: python-whisper source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri 
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep


N:Please use
N:http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=revision 
as the format URI instead.

But this urls is wrong, it 404.

I have changed it into:

http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/copyright-format.xml?revision=248

But now lintian complains about unknown-copyright-format-uri ;)


Yes, DEP-5 and its format URIs is a mess. I pointed out this lintian tag 
only because the specification has been overhauled since r135.


I made some tiny modifications to debian/changelog (I hope you don't 
mind!) and uploaded the package. Thanks!


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120128181254.ga...@jwilk.net



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2012-01-28 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello,

 http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/copyright-format.xml?revision=248
 
 But now lintian complains about unknown-copyright-format-uri ;)
 
 Yes, DEP-5 and its format URIs is a mess. I pointed out this lintian
 tag only because the specification has been overhauled since r135.

yes you are right. :)

 
 I made some tiny modifications to debian/changelog (I hope you don't 
 mind!) and uploaded the package. Thanks!

no problem, Thanks for your review and your upload!

Greets,
Jonas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120128195354.11313...@swetlana.brachium-system.net



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 00:47, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
 writes:

 Today I have switched python-whisper to use python-support instead of
 python-central
 […]

 Be aware that, for an package that was *already* in Debian, you would
 need to modify your maintainer scripts to clean up after the mess left
 by ‘python-central’ in previous versions of the package. See
 URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/03/msg00060.html (view
 the full thread for a discussion of why it's necessary).

 That's not strictly needed for a package that was never in Debian to
 date, but it might be a good idea (and at any rate it does no harm) if
 your package has ever been installed via other repositories.

No. That only applies for packages that are in *stable* (with
python-central) and are now in testing/unstable (with python-support).
If the pacakge (it's an ITP so it was *never* in Debian) switches from
central to support in testing/unstable is not needed. Document a bit
better before suggesting such methods when not needed.

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-28 Thread Elliot Murphy
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Elliot Murphy ell...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Dear mentors and python-module-packagers,

 I joined the team recently, injected my package into svn, and have now
 uploaded it to mentors. The package looks lintian-clean, and my test
 installations have worked OK. I'll gladly fix anything a sponsor might
 request to be fixed. Below is the RFS template, and thanks for your help!

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-whisper.

 * Package name    : python-whisper
  Version         : 0.9.5-1
  Upstream Author : Chris Davis chrismd at gmail com
 * URL             : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/whisper/0.9.5
 * License         : Apache Software License 2.0
  Section         : python

 It builds these binary packages:
 python-whisper - fast, reliable storage of numeric data over time.

 The package appears to be lintian clean.

 The upload would fix these bugs: 563765

 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I want to package the
 cool metrics graphing software called Graphite, and this is one of the
 dependencies. I expect 3 packages in total: this one, and two
 applications called python-carbon and graphite-web.

 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-whisper
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
 main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-whisper/python-whisper_0.9.5-1.dsc

 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.


Today I have switched python-whisper to use python-support instead of
python-central, as requested by jwilk on IRC. Previously I had updated
the short description as requested by Ben. Any other changes that are
needed? I would still like to find a sponsor to upload this package.
Thanks!

-- 
Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Finney
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:

 Today I have switched python-whisper to use python-support instead of
 python-central
[…]

Be aware that, for an package that was *already* in Debian, you would
need to modify your maintainer scripts to clean up after the mess left
by ‘python-central’ in previous versions of the package. See
URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/03/msg00060.html (view
the full thread for a discussion of why it's necessary).

That's not strictly needed for a package that was never in Debian to
date, but it might be a good idea (and at any rate it does no harm) if
your package has ever been installed via other repositories.

-- 
 \   “We must find our way to a time when faith, without evidence, |
  `\disgraces anyone who would claim it.” —Sam Harris, _The End of |
_o__) Faith_, 2004 |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-28 Thread Elliot Murphy
Thanks for that pointer. I have a couple packages that I need to convert
which were already published in other archives, so this is very handy.
(Sorry for top-posting, android does not allow me any other option).

-- 
Elliot Murphy | https://launchad.net/~statik/

On Jan 28, 2010 6:48 PM, Ben Finney
ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auben%2bdeb...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:

Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:  Today I have switched
python-whisper to use python-s...
[…]

Be aware that, for an package that was *already* in Debian, you would
need to modify your maintainer scripts to clean up after the mess left
by ‘python-central’ in previous versions of the package. See
URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/03/msg00060.html (view
the full thread for a discussion of why it's necessary).

That's not strictly needed for a package that was never in Debian to
date, but it might be a good idea (and at any rate it does no harm) if
your package has ever been installed via other repositories.

--
 \   “We must find our way to a time when faith, without evidence, |
 `\disgraces anyone who would claim it.” —Sam Harris, _The End of |
_o__) Faith_, 2004 |
Ben Finney


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org


Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Finney
Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:

 (Sorry for top-posting, android does not allow me any other option).

I wonder why people who use Android keep on doing this an apologising
for it, instead of the far superior options:

* don't use Android, and/or
* agitate for this Android bug to be fixed.

-- 
 \“When in doubt tell the truth. It will confound your enemies |
  `\   and astound your friends.” —Mark Twain, _Following the Equator_ |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
 Elliot Murphy ell...@canonical.com writes:

 (Sorry for top-posting, android does not allow me any other option).

 I wonder why people who use Android keep on doing this an apologising
 for it, instead of the far superior options:

 * don't use Android, and/or
 * agitate for this Android bug to be fixed.

Or don't let yourself be trapped by U/I conventions.  If you edit the
section of the message that holds the content you are replying to and put
your reply in that box (below what you are quoting), it works fine.

Scott K


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-06 Thread Elliot Murphy
Dear mentors and python-module-packagers,

I joined the team recently, injected my package into svn, and have now
uploaded it to mentors. The package looks lintian-clean, and my test
installations have worked OK. I'll gladly fix anything a sponsor might
request to be fixed. Below is the RFS template, and thanks for your help!

I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-whisper.

* Package name: python-whisper
  Version : 0.9.5-1
  Upstream Author : Chris Davis chrismd at gmail com
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/whisper/0.9.5
* License : Apache Software License 2.0
  Section : python

It builds these binary packages:
python-whisper - fast, reliable storage of numeric data over time.

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 563765

My motivation for maintaining this package is: I want to package the
cool metrics graphing software called Graphite, and this is one of the
dependencies. I expect 3 packages in total: this one, and two
applications called python-carbon and graphite-web.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-whisper
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-whisper/python-whisper_0.9.5-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Elliot Murphy
-- 
Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-06 Thread Elliot Murphy
On 01/06/2010 05:10 PM, Elliot Murphy wrote:
 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I want to package the
 cool metrics graphing software called Graphite, and this is one of the
 dependencies. I expect 3 packages in total: this one, and two
 applications called python-carbon and graphite-web.

I forgot to include a link to Graphite:

http://graphite.wikidot.com/faq
http://graphite.wikidot.com/screen-shots

-- 
Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-06 Thread Ben Finney
Elliot Murphy ell...@ubuntu.com writes:

 It builds these binary packages:
 python-whisper - fast, reliable storage of numeric data over time.

The package synopsis should be a brief answer to the question of “What
*is* this package?”, and I don't find that synopsis addresses that
question.

That is, the synopsis “foo” should fit into a sentence of the form “The
package ‘python-whisper’ is a foo”.

A suggestion for a better synopsis:

database engine for fast, reliable fixed-sized databases

-- 
 \   “I was sleeping the other night, alone, thanks to the |
  `\   exterminator.” —Emo Philips |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney


pgp1Cln7jvzpJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RFS: python-whisper

2010-01-06 Thread Elliot Murphy
On 01/06/2010 07:12 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
 A suggestion for a better synopsis:
 
 database engine for fast, reliable fixed-sized databases
 

Thanks! Changed per your suggestion and committed to svn.

-- 
Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature