Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
Hi, po 14. 1. 2019 v 20:27 odesílatel Drew Parsons napsal: > Will it help if I join DPMT? to join DPMT, you need to read and accept our policy: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On Monday, January 28, 2019 10:35 CET, Ondrej Novy wrote: Hi, po 14. 1. 2019 v 20:27 odesílatel Drew Parsons napsal:Will it help if I join DPMT? to join DPMT, you need to read and accept our policy:https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted. The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. I've installed git-dpm, likely it will be useful for my other packages. My salsa login is dparsons Drew
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:13:46AM +0100, webm...@emerall.com wrote: > Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted. > The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. > I've installed git-dpm, likely it will be useful for my other packages. It will not be useful in DPMT/PAPT. The policy is outdated and we have switched to using gbp instead, as described here: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging Ondřeji, do you mind if I merge this? https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/4 Only your comment about debian/gbp.conf seems to be blocking it. I think that at least specifying debian-branch is definitely needed. If you want I can simplify it to just that one line before merging, and/or link to the wiki instead of recommending any specific gbp.conf content. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On 2019-01-29 10:36, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:13:46AM +0100, webm...@emerall.com wrote: Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted. The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. I've installed git-dpm, likely it will be useful for my other packages. It will not be useful in DPMT/PAPT. The policy is outdated and we have switched to using gbp instead, as described here: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging Ah good, thanks for the update Dmitry. By the way I apologise for my webmail client showing my email plumbing (it should have replied as dpars...@debian.org not webm...@emerall.com). My email provider (gandi.net) recently changed its webmail interface, but the new software doesn't handle Reply-To addresses well. I've sent them a bug report. Drew
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On 2019-01-29 10:36, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:13:46AM +0100, webm...@emerall.com wrote: On Monday, January 28, 2019 10:35 CET, Ondrej Novy wrote: to join DPMT, you need to read and accept our policy: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted. The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. ... By the way I apologise for my webmail client showing my email plumbing (it should have replied as dpars...@debian.org not webm...@emerall.com). My email provider >(gandi.net) recently changed its webmail interface, but the new software doesn't handle Reply-To addresses well. I've sent them a bug report. On 2019-01-15 03:27, Drew Parsons wrote: Hi Python team, now that numpy 1.16rc has reached testing, are there plans to get scipy 1.2.0 into the coming release? Will it help if I join DPMT? I can then update scipy and upload to experimental. Please add me on salsa if that will help. Hi again Ondrej and Debian Python Team, my request to join DPMT still hasn't been processed. My salsa id is dpars...@debian.org There's a new update to scipy which I can help get into experimental, then we can test dipy again. Drew
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
Hi, po 28. 1. 2019 v 11:13 odesílatel webm...@emerall.com napsal: > Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted. > welcome :) > The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. I've installed > git-dpm, likely it will be useful for my other packages. > please don't use git-dpm in DPMT :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
Hi, út 29. 1. 2019 v 10:36 odesílatel Dmitry Shachnev napsal: > Ondřeji, do you mind if I merge this? > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/4 let's merge it without "Configurations" section now, please. > Only your comment about debian/gbp.conf seems to be blocking it. I think > that > at least specifying debian-branch is definitely needed. it's not. You can use --git-ignore-branch, which works fine. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On 2019-03-15 21:15, Ondrej Novy wrote: Hi, Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted. welcome :) Thanks :) I fixed scipy's test failures :) The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. I've installed git-dpm, likely it will be useful for my other packages. please don't use git-dpm in DPMT :) Yeah, I got the update :) quilt / dpkg-source --commit will do. Drew
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:34:26PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/4 > > let's merge it without "Configurations" section now, please. Done! I will now also review the follow-up merge requests. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On 2019-03-17 02:39, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:34:26PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/4 let's merge it without "Configurations" section now, please. Done! I will now also review the follow-up merge requests. Hi Dmitry, the Tools section still refers to git-dpm. Drew.
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On 2019-03-17 02:48, Drew Parsons wrote: Hi Dmitry, the Tools section still refers to git-dpm. Ah, that would be MR-5, still in discussion.
Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 02:50:32AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2019-03-17 02:48, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > Hi Dmitry, the Tools section still refers to git-dpm. > > Ah, that would be MR-5, still in discussion. Yes. I will give the original submitter (Yao Wei) some time to fix this, but if he does not respond, I will merge it with my suggestion applied. (I hope Ondřej does not mind.) -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
