Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Em Sáb, 2006-06-03 às 12:14 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: > In other words, it needs python-setuptools >= 0.6a11-1, but the latest > in Debian is 0.6a9-1. :) Weird; I'll take a look at that. Thanks, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
On 6/3/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Em Sex, 2006-06-02 às 18:55 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> Hi Kov,
Hey,
> I've installed python-turbogears 0.9a6-1 from your repository[0] and i
> see the following error message:
[...]
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: TurboGears==0.9a6
Could you run a python interpreter and type the following?:
import pkg_resources
pkg_resources.require ('TurboGears')
That'll tell you exactly what's the problem, then I can fix it in the
package deps or somewhere else =).
$ python2.4
Python 2.4.2 (#2, Nov 20 2005, 17:04:48)
[GCC 4.0.3 2005 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources
pkg_resources.require ('TurboGears')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6a9-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py",
line 503, in require
needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6a9-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py",
line 487, in resolve
raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (setuptools 0.6a9
(/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6a9-py2.4.egg),
Requirement.parse('setuptools>=0.6a11'))
In other words, it needs python-setuptools >= 0.6a11-1, but the latest
in Debian is 0.6a9-1. :)
(...)
thanks,
-- stratus
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Em Sex, 2006-06-02 às 18:55 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> Hi Kov,
Hey,
> I've installed python-turbogears 0.9a6-1 from your repository[0] and i
> see the following error message:
[...]
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: TurboGears==0.9a6
Could you run a python interpreter and type the following?:
import pkg_resources
pkg_resources.require ('TurboGears')
That'll tell you exactly what's the problem, then I can fix it in the
package deps or somewhere else =).
> Something related with 'eggs' ?
Some egg missing, probably.
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
On 5/18/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey! Em Sáb, 2006-05-13 às 21:42 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: > Comments? Bug reports to my email address, please. May I go on and > upload the packages to unstable? I'll upload TurboGears 0.9 to > experimental, if it is ok, 'till it is released as stable. The modules > will go straight to unstable. I am planning to upload the packages this weekend. If noone is against, I'll go ahead and upload all python modules which I had to package for the 0.8 and 0.9 versions to unstable, and TG 0.9 and closely related modules to experimetal. I'll take a look at what still needs changing in current packages and file bugs if they are still in need of updating. Hi Kov, I've installed python-turbogears 0.9a6-1 from your repository[0] and i see the following error message: $ tg-admin quickstart Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/tg-admin", line 5, in ? from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6a9-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 2195, in ? for dist in working_set.resolve( File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6a9-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 483, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) # XXX put more info here pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: TurboGears==0.9a6 [0] = http://people.debian.org/~kov/tg0.9/ Something related with 'eggs' ? regards, -- stratus
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Hey! Em Sáb, 2006-05-13 às 21:42 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: > Comments? Bug reports to my email address, please. May I go on and > upload the packages to unstable? I'll upload TurboGears 0.9 to > experimental, if it is ok, 'till it is released as stable. The modules > will go straight to unstable. I am planning to upload the packages this weekend. If noone is against, I'll go ahead and upload all python modules which I had to package for the 0.8 and 0.9 versions to unstable, and TG 0.9 and closely related modules to experimetal. I'll take a look at what still needs changing in current packages and file bugs if they are still in need of updating. See you =) -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
On 5/13/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Em Qua, 2006-05-10 às 22:53 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: > In the mean time, I'm working on packaging the stuff needed by TG 0.9; I finished the first working packaging of TurboGears 0.9, and uploaded a tarball with all the packages required for a Debian unstable box, I hope: http://people.debian.org/~kov/tg0.9.tar.gz Comments? Bug reports to my email address, please. May I go on and upload the packages to unstable? I'll upload TurboGears 0.9 to experimental, if it is ok, 'till it is released as stable. The modules will go straight to unstable. Thanks kov, i'm heavily busy with CDD stuff now but i'll test TurboGears during the weekend and report you back with suggestions and/or bug reports. :) regards, -- stratus
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
On 5/4/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Em Qui, 2006-05-04 às 10:38 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: > I think you can do that, but since it's isn't our default option (we > usually keep just debian/ for those who don't know yet) it can confuse > people working on this package during a BSP, transition or something > like that. Well, there's no place to get the orig.tar.gz from. Maybe I can have a README commited to the json-py/ directory to mention this? See you! I agree with the README idea, and i'm sorry to reply too late. :) cya, -- stratus
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Em Qua, 2006-05-10 às 22:53 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: > In the mean time, I'm working on packaging the stuff needed by TG 0.9; I finished the first working packaging of TurboGears 0.9, and uploaded a tarball with all the packages required for a Debian unstable box, I hope: http://people.debian.org/~kov/tg0.9.tar.gz Comments? Bug reports to my email address, please. May I go on and upload the packages to unstable? I'll upload TurboGears 0.9 to experimental, if it is ok, 'till it is released as stable. The modules will go straight to unstable. See you, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Bob, Pythoners, Em Qua, 2006-05-03 às 22:35 -0500, Bob Tanner escreveu: > > I plan to add turbogears and json-py to the python-modules team; Bob, > > what say you? Have you made any work on this front? Should I go on and > > upload those packages to Debian? > > I have most of those packages (some dated) are in my personal repository. > > deb-src ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time sid custom main contrib > non-free I'm taking a look at them while doing my work, though I most of the times decide to start from scratch because I'm taking a different approach (by using python-support, mainly), and am trying to keep the naming compliant with our draft policy. > Push what you got, I'll post any major differences for discussion and sync > my stuff to alioth. Do you have any words on the turbogears package currently sitting there? I uploaded json-py, and I'd like to upload turbogears as soon as the other packages which are dependencies get support for it, what do you say? In the mean time, I'm working on packaging the stuff needed by TG 0.9; I've made packages for pyprotocols and ruledispatch; I added them both to the python-modules svn, and uploaded them here: http://people.debian.org/~kov/turbogears/ May I go ahead and upload them to unstable, closing your ITP's (maybe becoming the submitter for them, myself before that?), what is your opinion on this matter? It would be good to get these packages going through NEW already; we have less and less time to try out stuff, stabilize them and maybe get them into Etch (!) =). Some work still to go; let's see if I'll be able to see the wonderful Toolbox running through a packaged TurboGears 'till the end of the week. See you, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Em Qui, 2006-05-04 às 10:38 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: > I think you can do that, but since it's isn't our default option (we > usually keep just debian/ for those who don't know yet) it can confuse > people working on this package during a BSP, transition or something > like that. Well, there's no place to get the orig.tar.gz from. Maybe I can have a README commited to the json-py/ directory to mention this? See you! -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
On 5/4/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bob! =) Em Qua, 2006-05-03 às 22:35 -0500, Bob Tanner escreveu: > Push what you got, I'll post any major differences for discussion and sync > my stuff to alioth. I svn-injected both json-py and turbogears into our svn, with those names. I wonder, since json-py has a quite cooked-up orig.tar.gz, and since it is small, if it is wise to keep the upstream source in the svn as well, what do you people think? I think you can do that, but since it's isn't our default option (we usually keep just debian/ for those who don't know yet) it can confuse people working on this package during a BSP, transition or something like that. Thanks, -- stratus
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Bob! =) Em Qua, 2006-05-03 às 22:35 -0500, Bob Tanner escreveu: > Push what you got, I'll post any major differences for discussion and sync > my stuff to alioth. I svn-injected both json-py and turbogears into our svn, with those names. I wonder, since json-py has a quite cooked-up orig.tar.gz, and since it is small, if it is wise to keep the upstream source in the svn as well, what do you people think? See you, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > I plan to add turbogears and json-py to the python-modules team; Bob, > what say you? Have you made any work on this front? Should I go on and > upload those packages to Debian? I haven't been a very good team player, we duplicated some work. I have most of those packages (some dated) are in my personal repository. deb-src ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time sid custom main contrib non-free Push what you got, I'll post any major differences for discussion and sync my stuff to alioth. -- Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9
Hello, I've spent some time today looking at what needs to be done to get TurboGears 0.8.9 into Debian (I really want the shiny new features of 0.9, though =D). I've made changes to the formencode[0] and sqlobject packages, patched them to provide egg-info and filed bugs (#365957, #365961) with patches. Also, I packaged TurboGears, and patched it so it will work with our CherryPy 2.2 packages, and packaged json-py (creating the .tar.gz from scratch, adding a dumb setup.py, from the .zip). If noone is interested in turning the RFP Bob opened for json-py, I'll probably retitle it ITP and maintain this package. I uploaded the debs and source packages here: http://people.debian.org/~kov/turbogears/ I plan to add turbogears and json-py to the python-modules team; Bob, what say you? Have you made any work on this front? Should I go on and upload those packages to Debian? I think this makes enough packages for TurboGears 0.8.9! See you, [0]: One interesting thing I'd like to comment is formencode brings some new challenges to python-support stuff, because currently the packages for py2.3 and py2.4 do not ship the same set of files: the 2.3 version has 2 files removed, which use the new decorators. -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
