Re: pyfakefs: Outdate version was migrated today

[Scott Talbert]

On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:


Hello folks,
my question is not critic but just learning purpose. Because in the Debian 
universe I always assume that there is a good reason behind each activity, no 
matter if I understand it or not.


Here is one I don't understand.
Today (9th December '22) pyfakefs 4.6.3 was migrated [1] into testing. But 
the latest stable release at upstream is 5.0.0 release two months ago [2].


So why does a Debian package maintainer invest time and resources into 
packaging an out dated version of a package?


The version that migrated to testing on 9 December was just a bug fix, see 
[3].  Version 4.6.3 was initially packaged on 12 September [4].


Scott

[3] 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1393666/accepted-python-pyfakefs-463-3-source-into-unstable/
[4] 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1361844/accepted-python-pyfakefs-463-1-source-into-unstable/

pyfakefs: Outdate version was migrated today

[c . buhtz]

Hello folks,
my question is not critic but just learning purpose. Because in the 
Debian universe I always assume that there is a good reason behind each 
activity, no matter if I understand it or not.


Here is one I don't understand.
Today (9th December '22) pyfakefs 4.6.3 was migrated [1] into testing. 
But the latest stable release at upstream is 5.0.0 release two months 
ago [2].


So why does a Debian package maintainer invest time and resources into 
packaging an out dated version of a package?


Greetings
Christian

[1] -- 


[2] --