Bugs against package 'timeout'
Dear QA people, While triaging bugs that don't belong to any package I have found these: $ querybts --buglist timeout Querying Debian BTS for reports on timeout... #531025 change in usage should be doc in NEWS. timeout command always take 'time' seconds to finish #585745 Please drop timeout binary package #520323 wrong exit code when timeout not reached #531787 timeout move to coreutils? #639197 timeout program does not return exit status of executed program #399769 timeout: bad support for processes which use a process group #292817 timeout: Please support more time formats As far as I can tell the package is not in Debian anymore[1] so I propose closing these bugs. If there is no disagreement I will do so in a few days. [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
Hi Andrei, On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > As far as I can tell the package is not in Debian anymore[1] so I > propose closing these bugs. If there is no disagreement I will do so in > a few days. > > [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-) The package is still in oldstable, bugs will be closed automatically when oldstable is archived. -> Nothing to do here. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
On 2013-05-16 14:42 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > While triaging bugs that don't belong to any package I have found these: > > $ querybts --buglist timeout > Querying Debian BTS for reports on timeout... > #585745 Please drop timeout binary package > #531787 timeout move to coreutils? These can obviously be closed, because timeout is now indeed provided by coreutils. > #520323 wrong exit code when timeout not reached > #531025 change in usage should be doc in NEWS. timeout command always take > 'time' seconds to finish > #639197 timeout program does not return exit status of executed program > #399769 timeout: bad support for processes which use a process group After a quick glance, it seems to me that coreutils' version of timeout behaves correctly in all these cases, but you might want to double-check that. > #292817 timeout: Please support more time formats Implemented in the coreutils version, see "timeout --help". > As far as I can tell the package is not in Debian anymore[1] so I > propose closing these bugs. If there is no disagreement I will do so in > a few days. Seems good to me. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87txm3yo7p@turtle.gmx.de
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 16:34:35, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > > [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports > > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-) Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use the PTS next time. > The package is still in oldstable, bugs will be closed automatically when > oldstable is archived. -> Nothing to do here. Ok, good to know, removed from my TODO list. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 17:54:57, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 16 mai 13, 16:34:35, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > > > > [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports > > > > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-) > > Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use > the PTS next time. BTW, would you know why 'rmadison' also comes up empty? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-) > > The package is still in oldstable Nope. adsb@franck:~$ dak ls timeout adsb@franck:~$ Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1368729209.16705.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 19:33:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-) > > > > The package is still in oldstable > > Nope. That would explain why rmadison also came up empty, but why does the PTS claim the package is still in oldstable? Maybe it's looking at lenny? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bugs against package 'timeout'
Hi Andrei >> > > [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports >> > >> > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-) >> >> Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use >> the PTS next time. > > BTW, would you know why 'rmadison' also comes up empty? On the mirrors, we seem to have a source package that generates two binary packages (tct and timeout, both arch:any), but only one of these binary packages is there. http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tct I can't explain that either. rmadison is using UDD and UDD uses the Packages files. Is it possible that this binary package was removed somehow which is why dak doesn't know about it, it was removed from Packages and then the orphaned .deb removed from the pool? I don't think I've ever seen a single binary from a source package removed. cheers Stuart -- Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprintBE65 FD1E F4EA 08F3 23D4 3C6D 9FE8 B8CD 71C5 D1A8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/knh2m3$e82$1...@ger.gmane.org
