Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
alexan...@schmehl.info wrote:

 Anyone interested in co maintaining that?  Upstream is non existent,
 there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
 standard.  Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.

It is worth noting that at least Fedora and Gentoo use Debian's at
package for their upstream, so it might be a good idea to start an
alioth project and invite other distributions to collaborate there.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi all,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:48, Sandro Tosimo...@debian.org wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: normal

 The current maintainer of at, Ryan Murray rmur...@debian.org,
 is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

 Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
 package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.

exactly. Please, pretty please, whoever will adopt this package check
this [1] and in particular [2]

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/08/msg00047.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/08/msg00048.html

forming a team on alioth is the right thing to do, so please do the
necessary action to achieve it.

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info (11/08/2009):
 Anyone interested in co maintaining that?  Upstream is non existent,
 there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
 standard.  Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.

If time permits, yes.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature