Re: project idea: Debian metric portal
Hi, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:03:57PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > seems you are desperately seeking new tasks for you past-leader time. ;-) > > Indeed: freedom, at last! :) :-) I can't miss any chance to say: "Thank you for your fine work!" (and so I do hereby). > > Do you also consider including the results of the teammetrics projects > > of GSoC 2011 and 2012[1]. > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/01/msg00011.html > ... > On the other hand, team metrics are kind of weird, as > they're neither project-wide (meaning: one metric per project), Hmmm, active people on debian-devel, debian-project or debian-user are somehow project-wide. > nor as > abundant as package (meaning: one metric per package). So, I still don't > know whether it would be a good fit. I also don't know whether it is a good fit - my question was rather in the direction of clarifying the scope of your project because we just had a project containing the term "metric". > We'll see, I guess. Let's first get > the infrastructure in place, then you'll be free to (ab)use it as you > please :-) > « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » :-) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130314160236.gb7...@an3as.eu
Re: project idea: Debian metric portal
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:03:57PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > seems you are desperately seeking new tasks for you past-leader time. ;-) Indeed: freedom, at last! :) > > It's essentially a refactoring/reengineering initiative to consolidate > > all the scattered metrics graphing initiatives we have throughout the > > project. Those of you familiar with Tor might recognize some > > similarities with http://metrics.torproject.org > > Do you also consider including the results of the teammetrics projects > of GSoC 2011 and 2012[1]. > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/01/msg00011.html I don't consider including *specific* data sources as an objective for the project. But surely including any relevant project-wide metric out there should be easy enough, otherwise I wouldn't consider the result successful. On the other hand, team metrics are kind of weird, as they're neither project-wide (meaning: one metric per project), nor as abundant as package (meaning: one metric per package). So, I still don't know whether it would be a good fit. We'll see, I guess. Let's first get the infrastructure in place, then you'll be free to (ab)use it as you please :-) Thanks for your feedback, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: project idea: Debian metric portal
Hi Stefano, seems you are desperately seeking new tasks for you past-leader time. ;-) On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:46:52AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Heya, here is a draft of a project I'd like to mentor for GSoC, assuming > we find an interested and suitable student. > > [project description] > > It's essentially a refactoring/reengineering initiative to consolidate > all the scattered metrics graphing initiatives we have throughout the > project. Those of you familiar with Tor might recognize some > similarities with http://metrics.torproject.org Do you also consider including the results of the teammetrics projects of GSoC 2011 and 2012[1]. > I welcome feedback on the idea, as well as volunteers for co-mentoring > with me. > > An open point for discussion is what should be used as database to stock > the underlying data. UDD currently has *some* historical data but, at > least in the beginning, it didn't have vocation at storing that kind of > data. So I was more thinking at using a separate database, but I've no > strong opinion either way. Any suggestion? I'd be afraid that once data is somewhere else it might remain there. So if there are no good reasons to keep it outside I would consider including it into UDD (which is my very personal view). Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/01/msg00011.html -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130314140357.ge28...@an3as.eu
Re: project idea: Debian metric portal
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > '''Debian metrics portal''' I guess this isn't about per-package metrics (Mole/PTS is good for that), but about things like the ones listed on the stats wiki page? http://wiki.debian.org/Statistics http://wiki.debian.org/Mole -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FH68dset=dgxjdrflvafhocqszfrvcpt-gniaauqf...@mail.gmail.com
