Re: Re: Removed packages handling
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:49:56PM +0100, benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl wrote: > These are abandoned packages no one cares for. > Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group. > Seems logic to me. > > What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, thes > are not realy bound to a maintainer but are still healthy. Still not sure what problem do you see, what are you proposing and how is this related to your original email. Also please reply to emails using the reply function instead of composing new unrelated ones. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Re: Removed packages handling
These are abandoned packages no one cares for. Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group. Seems logic to me. What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, thes are not realy bound to a maintainer but are still healthy.
Re: Removed packages handling
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:57:49AM +0100, benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl wrote: > I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group. What do you mean? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Removed packages handling
I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group. Made some maybe handy lists. (not yet all packages) gone packages https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Gone2021.html Debian QA Group https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Debian_QA_Group2021.html Nice Day, Ben https://www.gezapig.nl/Free.html
