Bug#132168: marked as done (svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#132168: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 18:37:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 12:37:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [195.188.53.121] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XRWA-0006Y6-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:37:34 -0600
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by blueyonder.co.uk  
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:37:34 +
Received: from localhost (unverified [62.30.104.135]) by 
pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:37:33 +
Received: from malcolm by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16XR1m-0003Sy-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:10 +
From: Malcolm Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:10 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: svgalibg1
Version: 1:1.4.3-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7

svgalibg1 contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.

This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html

For details of which files in svgalibg1 are not marked as conffiles see
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html

If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.

If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.

Example configuration files should be placed in 
/usr/share/doc/svgalibg1/examples

See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.


---
Received: (at 132168-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 23:34:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 17:34:52 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XW9r-0005GY-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:34:52 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-184.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.184] 
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16XW9q-00010a-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:34:50 +
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 
(Debian))
id 16XW9j-LB-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#132168: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This bug doesn't apply to the current version of svgalibg1 (fixed in
1:1.4.3-3, I believe). Since svgalibg1 is now orphaned, I'm closing
this.

While I appreciate you arranging that people actually pay attention to
this, would you mind checking against a real mirror? I suspect I'm going
to have to go and do all of that now ...

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#125026: marked as done (librmc: Spelling error in description)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#125026: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 22:42:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 16:42:56 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16G6TI-0008Qg-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:42:56 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com 
([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
id 16G6TI-0001uD-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:42:56 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16G6TH-0001QM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:42:55 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: librmc: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:42:55 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: librmc
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- orig/librmc Mon Dec 17 15:52:26 2001
+++ corrected/librmcMon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Package: librmc
 Description: Remote method call
  RMC is the glue for some networking enabled software, it will be used by:
- 3Dsia, odb, OpenPL, OGICLib and others. It connects different OS accross
- most networks fast and trasparent. This permit use clearly dce, rpc, and
+ 3Dsia, odb, OpenPL, OGICLib and others. It connects different OS across
+ most networks fast and transparent. This permit use clearly DCE, rpc, and
  others in simple manner. So scope of this library is run objects on remote 
hosts.
 

---
Received: (at 125026-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:21:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 14:21:51 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XT95-lC-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:21:51 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSyp-0004MO-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#125026: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL

Bug#125320: marked as done (rmc-binaries: Spelling error in description)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#125320: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 23:06:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 17:06:56 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16G6qV-0003E2-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:06:56 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com 
([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
id 16G6qV-0005l5-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:06:55 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16G6qV-0002Nl-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:06:55 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rmc-binaries: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:06:55 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: rmc-binaries
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- orig/rmc-binaries   Mon Dec 17 15:52:32 2001
+++ corrected/rmc-binaries  Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 Package: rmc-binaries
 Description: Remote method call
- This conintains common binaries which use librmc
+ This contains common binaries which use librmc
 

---
Received: (at 125320-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:21:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 14:21:51 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XT95-l7-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:21:51 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSyp-0004MQ-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#125320: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rmc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628

Bug#130965: marked as done (Long description line)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#130965: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2002 15:09:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 26 09:09:15 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.makif.omer.k12.il) [192.117.130.34] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16UUSA-00066u-00; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:09:15 -0600
Received: from [212.179.195.53] (helo=insomnia17)
by mail.makif.omer.k12.il with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16UUS8-00064a-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:09:12 +0200
Received: from yotam by insomnia17 with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16UUS6-ic-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:09:10 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Yotam Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Long description line
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Yotam Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:09:10 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: librmc
Version: 20010628CVS-3.2
Severity: minor

Hi,

The long description contains a line whose length is greater than 81 characters,
causing the description to render in an ugly fashion on some frontends.
Line 4 is the problematic line.

Thanks, Yotam Rubin

P.S.: This bug report has been automatically generated. I apologize if a bug
  pertaining to this problem has already been filed.

---
Received: (at 130965-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:23:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 14:23:03 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XTAF-oT-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:23:03 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSyp-0004MU-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#130965: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rmc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rmc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  2 Feb 2002 20:30:04 +
Source: rmc
Binary: librmc-dev rmc-binaries librmc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20010628CVS-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 librmc - Remote method call
 librmc-dev - Remote method call (development files)
 rmc-binaries - Remote method call (common binaries)
Closes: 125026 125320 129117 130965
Changes: 
 rmc (20010628CVS-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Various fixes for g++-3 (closes: #129117):
 - configure.in: Just check whether libstdc++ is there (by checking for
   main()) rather than trying to check for cout, as there doesn't appear
   to be any simple way to get 'using namespace std;' into the check.
 - src/Demos/Chat/Server/Chat_s.h: Use 'friend class foo', not 'friend
   foo'.
   * Rewrite descriptions in proper English (closes: #125026, #125320).
   * Don't use long lines in lib

Bug#129117: marked as done (problem persists)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129117: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2002 04:33:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 13 22:33:38 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) 
[195.92.249.252] (exim)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16PyoU-k3-00; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:33:38 -0600
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5)
id 16PyoP-oH-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:33:33 +
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:33:33 +
From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem persists
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: rmc
Version: 20010628CVS-3.2
Severity: important

*sigh*.  Bug #104669 seems to have expired from the BTS, even though I can
still see it on the website...

(1) The version you uploaded (-3.2) is an NMU version number, not an MU
number, should have been -4.
(2) The interdiff between -3.1 and -3.2 is:

diff -u rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog
--- rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog
+++ rmc-20010628CVS/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+rmc (20010628CVS-3.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fixed build failure on hppa (closes: Bug#104669) 
+
+ -- Maurizio Boriani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  5 Dec 2001 13:42:43 +0100
+
 rmc (20010628CVS-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * NMU

which clearly is missing something :-)  A new upload would be appreciated.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

---
Received: (at 129117-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 20:21:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 14:21:50 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XT94-ky-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:21:50 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSyp-0004MS-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#129117: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rmc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rmc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  2 Feb 2002 20:30:04 +
Source: rmc
Binary: librmc-dev rmc-binaries librmc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20010628CVS-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 librmc - Remote method call
 librmc-dev - Remote method call (development files)
 rmc-binaries - Remote method call (common binaries)
Closes: 125026 125320 129117 130965
Changes: 
 rmc (20010628CVS-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Various fixes for g++-3 (closes: #129117):
 - configure.in: Just check whether libstdc++ is there (by checking

svgalib_1.4.3-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Installer 

Installing:
svgalib-bin_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalib1_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalib_1.4.3-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-5.diff.gz
svgalib_1.4.3-5.dsc
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-5.dsc
svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalibg1_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

rmc override disparity

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Installer 
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to devel.
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to utils.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])

rmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Installer 

Installing:
librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.gz
rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc_20010628CVS-5.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 125026 125320 129117 130965 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#132146: marked as done (biomode: Files in etc not marked as conffiles)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:56:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#132146: fixed in biomode 1.002-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 18:36:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 12:36:33 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcow057o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [195.188.53.94] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XRVB-0006VP-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:36:33 -0600
Received: from pcow057o.blueyonder.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by blueyonder.co.uk  
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:36:33 +
Received: from localhost (unverified [62.30.104.135]) by 
pcow057o.blueyonder.co.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:36:33 +
Received: from malcolm by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16XR1d-0003Ns-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:01 +
From: Malcolm Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: biomode: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:01 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: biomode
Version: 1.002-5
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7

biomode contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.

This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html

For details of which files in biomode are not marked as conffiles see
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html

If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.

If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.

Example configuration files should be placed in 
/usr/share/doc/biomode/examples

See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.


---
Received: (at 132146-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 19:57:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 13:57:56 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSlw-0005gQ-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 13:57:56 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSkQ-0003ib-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:56:22 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#132146: fixed in biomode 1.002-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:56:22 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
biomode, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

biomode_1.002-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6.diff.gz
biomode_1.002-6.dsc
  to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6.dsc
biomode_1.002-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated biomode package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  3 Feb 2002 19:19:59 +
Source: biomode
Binary: biomode
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.002-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 biomode- [Biology] An Emacs mode to edit genetic data
Closes: 132146
Changes: 
 biomode (1.002-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Make /etc/emacs/site-start.d/92bio-mode.el a conffile (closes: #132146).
   * Use Build-Depends-Indep rather than Build-Depends.
Files: 
 2f81b760de6a02dd23f0e0d2eb73c0ba 636 science optional biomode_1.002-6.dsc
 f50c1ef6

biomode_1.002-6_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Installer 

Installing:
biomode_1.002-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6.diff.gz
biomode_1.002-6.dsc
  to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6.dsc
biomode_1.002-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 132146 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#97568: marked as done (xmp: NMU 1.1.3-1.*)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:34:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No longer applicable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2001 13:10:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 15 08:10:10 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14zeaW-00051x-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:10:08 -0500
Received: from riva.ucam.org ([213.107.104.43]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 May 2001 14:10:07 +0100
Received: from cjw44 by riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 14zeaU-0006mU-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 14:10:06 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:10:06 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xmp: NMU 1.1.3-1.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 
at 12:58:01PM +0100
Organization: riva.ucam.org
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xmp
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: normal

As I said I would do a few weeks ago, I just uploaded an NMU for xmp to
perform the FHS transition and fix a few other policy-related bugs.
Here's the diff:

--- xmp-1.1.3.orig/Makefile.rules.in
+++ xmp-1.1.3/Makefile.rules.in
@@ -61,15 +61,19 @@
 
 clean::
rm -Rf *.o core errlist depend $(CFILES)
+ifdef DDIRS
for i in $(DDIRS); do \
cd $$i; [ -f Makefile ] && $(MAKE) clean; cd ..; \
done
+endif
 
 distclean::
rm -Rf depend $(CFILES) $(DCFILES)
+ifdef DDIRS
-for i in $(DDIRS); do \
cd $$i; [ -f Makefile ] && $(MAKE) distclean; cd ..; \
done
+endif
 
 ifdef DDIRS
 install::
--- xmp-1.1.3.orig/debian/changelog
+++ xmp-1.1.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+xmp (1.1.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Updated to policy version 3.1.1 and added build dependencies.
+  * FHS transition (closes: #91096, #91708).
+  * Converted to update-mime, via dh_installmime (closes: #74486, #81341).
+  * Let dh_installdocs do the doc-base handling.
+  * Removed call to obsolete dh_suidregister.
+  * Removed add-log-mailing-address from this changelog (~/.emacs is
+preferred).
+  * The clean target didn't work for me, so fixed it.
+  * Updated GPL pointer in copyright file.
+  * Removed package name from short description (lintian).
+
+ -- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 15 May 2001 13:28:48 +0100
+
 xmp (1.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New release.
@@ -22,5 +38,4 @@
 
 Local variables:
 mode: debian-changelog
-add-log-mailing-address: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 End:
--- xmp-1.1.3.orig/debian/control
+++ xmp-1.1.3/debian/control
@@ -2,12 +2,13 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Standards-Version: 2.4.0.0
+Standards-Version: 3.1.1
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2.0.40), xlibs-dev
 
 Package: xmp
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Description: XMP, a module player supporting AWE32, GUS, and software-mixing
+Description: A module player supporting AWE32, GUS, and software-mixing
  xmp is a module player for Linux/FreeBSD/Solaris. Initially designed as a
  XM player, today it recognizes the following module formats:
  .
--- xmp-1.1.3.orig/debian/copyright
+++ xmp-1.1.3/debian/copyright
@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@
 Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
 
 On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
-Public License can be found in `/usr/doc/copyright/GPL'.
+Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
--- xmp-1.1.3.orig/debian/doc-base
+++ xmp-1.1.3/debian/doc-base
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@
 Section: Apps/Sound
 
 Format: HTML
-Index: /usr/doc/xmp/xmp.html
-Files: /usr/doc/xmp/xmp.html
+Index: /usr/share/doc/xmp/xmp.html
+Files: /usr/share/doc/xmp/xmp.html
--- xmp-1.1.3.orig/debian/doc-base.faq
+++ xmp-1.1.3/debian/doc-base.faq
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
 Section: Apps/Sound
 
 Format: HTML
-Index: /usr/doc/xmp/FAQ.html
-Files: /usr/doc/xmp/FAQ.html
+Index: /usr/share/doc/xmp/FAQ.html
+Files: /

Bug#125523: marked as done (xcoral: Spelling error in description)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xcoral now maintained by QA Group
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2001 00:50:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 18:50:34 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16G8So-0006ct-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:50:34 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com 
([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
id 16G8Sn-00059V-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:50:33 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16G8Sm-0003HD-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:50:32 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xcoral: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:50:32 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xcoral
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- orig/xcoral Mon Dec 17 15:52:25 2001
+++ corrected/xcoralMon Dec 17 15:59:05 2001
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Package: xcoral
 Description: Extensible mouse-based text editor for X
- This is a multiwindow mouse-based text editor for the
+ This is a multi-window mouse-based text editor for the
  X Window System. It is provided with a built-in
  C/C++/Java browser and an Ansi C Interpreter to
  dynamically extend the editor's possibilities (modes,

---
Received: (at 125523-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 19:38:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 13:38:49 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSTQ-0004Dt-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 13:38:48 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-184.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.184] 
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16XSTP-0005pr-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:38:47 +
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 
(Debian))
id 16XST7-0008Co-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAI

Bug#93083: marked as done (failed autobuild of xcoral_1:3.2-3 (m68k): file permission problem with debian/substvars.new)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xcoral now maintained by QA Group
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2001 07:15:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 06 02:15:15 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.176.3] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14lQSg-0008Vv-00; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 02:15:14 -0500
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id 
JAA05743
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:15:13 +0200
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:15:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failed autobuild of xcoral_1:3.2-3 (m68k): file permission problem
 with debian/substvars.new
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xcoral
Version: 1:3.2-3
Severity: serious

xcoral fails to build from source with a file permission problem on
debian/substvars.new:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l 
/usr/local/chroot/unstable/build/buildd/xcoral-3.2/debian/
total 112
-rw-r--r--1 buildd   Debian  0 Apr  6 03:10 build-stamp
-rw-rw-r--1 buildd   Debian   2884 Apr  6 02:29 changelog
-rw-r--r--1 root root  751 Apr  6 02:30 control
-rw-r--r--1 buildd   Debian  0 Apr  6 02:31 depends-stamp
-rw-rw-r--1 buildd   Debian   2883 Apr  6 02:29 packages
-rw-r--r--1 buildd   Debian  0 Apr  6 02:31 patch-stamp
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root15537 Apr  6 02:30 rules
-rw-r--r--1 buildd   Debian  0 Apr  6 03:13 substvars.new
drwxr-xr-x4 buildd   Debian   4096 Apr  6 03:10 tmp-xcoral
-rw-rw-r--1 buildd   Debian  76106 Apr  6 02:29 yada

Michael

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 03:14:44 +0200
From: m68k build daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Log for failed build of xcoral_1:3.2-3 (dist=unstable)

Automatic build of xcoral_1:3.2-3 on q650 by sbuild 1.152
Build started at 20010406-0223
**
Fetching .dsc file...
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: grep-dctrl, xlibs-dev, grep-dctrl, yada (>= 0.9.5)

[...]

yada undocumented -x xcoral.1x
 -> install -d -m 755 
/build/buildd/xcoral-3.2/debian/tmp-xcoral/usr/X11R6/man/man1
 -> ln -s ../../../share/man/man7/undocumented.7.gz 
/build/buildd/xcoral-3.2/debian/tmp-xcoral/usr/X11R6/man/man1/xcoral.1x.gz
LD_LIBRARY_PATH="debian/tmp-xcoral/lib:debian/tmp-xcoral/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
 dpkg-shlibdeps -pshlibs:xcoral -dDepends debian/tmp-xcoral/usr/X11R6/bin/*
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: chown of `debian/substvars.new': Operation not 
permitted
make: *** [debian/tmp-xcoral/DEBIAN/control] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20010406-0313
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


---
Received: (at 93083-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 19:38:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 13:38:49 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XSTQ-0004Dt-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 13:38:48 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-184.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.184] 
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16XSTP-0005pr-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:38:47 +
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 
(Debian))
id 16XST7-0008Co-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xcoral now maintained by QA Group
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

xcoral is now maintained by the QA Group, so I'm closing these two bugs
that were tagged fixed by earlier uploads.

xcoral (1:3.40-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Maintainer upload (closes: #93083)

Processed: retitle 97738 to gv: can't render cook-2.17.ug.ps.gz

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 97738 gv: can't render cook-2.17.ug.ps.gz
Bug#97738: gv
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#132146: biomode: Files in etc not marked as conffiles

2002-02-03 Thread Colin Watson 
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 06:06:01PM +, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> Package: biomode
> Version: 1.002-5
> Severity: Serious
> Justification: Policy 11.7
> 
> biomode contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
> This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.

I'll handle this one.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#132146: biomode: Files in etc not marked as conffiles

2002-02-03 Thread Malcolm Parsons 
Package: biomode
Version: 1.002-5
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7

biomode contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.

This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html

For details of which files in biomode are not marked as conffiles see
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html

If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.

If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.

Example configuration files should be placed in 
/usr/share/doc/biomode/examples

See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.

Processed: jo :)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 27199 lshell fails to set limits in many cases
Bug#27199: lshell fails to set limits in many cases, default limits too low
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#71154: marked as done (igerman: new hk2-buglist should be merged)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:33:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with hkgerman 2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2000 13:20:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 08 08:20:41 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mediacompany.com [:::195.247.9.20] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13XO5A-0005w8-00; Fri, 08 Sep 2000 08:20:40 -0500
Received: by mail.mediacompany.com (Postfix, from userid 100)
id 8399B1C473; Fri,  8 Sep 2000 15:20:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from spinnaker.does-not-exist.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.42.1])
by luv.does-not-exist.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id 
PAA17828;
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 15:15:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: by spinnaker.does-not-exist.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 8 
Sep 2000 15:15:07 +0200
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 15:15:07 +0200
From: Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: igerman: new hk2-buglist should be merged
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: igerman
Version: 2-7.1
Severity: normal

I found a new list of bugs against the hk2 dictionary on
http://www.suse.de/~bjacke/igerman98/dict/hk2-buglist.
This list is an update of the list, mentioned in bug#28526, which was
merged into igerman 2-7.1.

Here's a patch against the hkgerman 2-7.1 source, which should
implement the bugs mentioned in the above list.

-- schnipp --
Index: adjektive.txt
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/hkgerman/adjektive.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.4
--- adjektive.txt   1999/10/14 18:58:15 1.2
+++ adjektive.txt   2000/09/08 12:37:37 1.4
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@
 aufgezwungen/A
 aufgliedernd/A
 aufkla"rerisch/A
-auflagenstark/AC
+auflagenstark/A
 auflandig/A
 auflodernd/A
 aufmerksam/ACU
@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@
 charakteristisch/AC
 charakterlich/A
 charakterlos/AC
-charakterstark/AC
+charakterstark/A
 charaktervoll/A
 charismatisch/AC
 charmant/AC
@@ -5778,7 +5778,6 @@
 lieferfertig/A
 liegengeblieben/A
 liegengelassen/A
-lies/A
 lind/A
 linear/A
 linguistisch/A
@@ -6865,7 +6864,7 @@
 redselig/AC
 redundant/A
 reell/ACU
-referentiell/A
+referenziell/A
 reflektiv/A
 reflexartig/A
 reflexionsfrei/A
@@ -9401,7 +9400,7 @@
 wohl/AC
 wohlangebracht/AC
 wohlansta"ndig/AC
-wohlauf/A
+wohlauf
 wohlbedacht/AC
 wohlbehalten/AC
 wohlbekannt/A
Index: compeng.txt
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/hkgerman/compeng.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- compeng.txt 1999/10/14 18:58:17 1.2
+++ compeng.txt 2000/09/08 12:37:39 1.3
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
 Access
-Accessoiries
-Accessoiry
 AdresSoffset/S
 Ansteuerboard/S
 Arbeitsdirectory
Index: geographie.txt
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/hkgerman/geographie.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 -r1.2
--- geographie.txt  1999/10/14 18:43:47 1.1.1.1
+++ geographie.txt  2000/09/08 12:37:39 1.2
@@ -811,7 +811,6 @@
 Serbien
 Seufzerbru"cke
 Sibirier/NS
-Sidnay
 Siebenbu"rgen
 Siebengebirge
 Simbabwe
Index: informatik.txt
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/hkgerman/informatik.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- informatik.txt  1999/10/14 18:58:17 1.2
+++ informatik.txt  2000/09/08 12:37:39 1.3
@@ -1295,7 +1295,6 @@
 benutzerdefiniert/A
 bijektiv/A
 bitweise/A
-boolesch/A
 compilieren/IXYDO
 deduktiv/A
 deduzieren/IXYDO
Index: klein.txt
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/hkgerman/klein.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- klein.txt   1999/10/14 18:58:18 1.2
+++ klein.txt   2000/09/08 12:37:39 1.3
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
 am
 an/S
 anbei
-anbetrachts
 anderenfalls
 anderenorts
 andererseits
@@ -196,7 +195,6 @@
 dessen
 desto
 deswegen
-desweiteren
 dich
 die
 diejenige/N
@@ -279,7 +277,6 @@
 einerlei
 einerseits
 einesteils
-einfu"rallemal
 eingangs
 eingedenk
 eingestandenermasSen
@@ -864,7 +861,7 @@
 untertage
 unterwegs
 unvermeidlicherweis

Bug#104812: marked as done (Build failure on hppa (at least))

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:01:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mule2 removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 05:08:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 14 00:08:52 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel1.hp.com [:::156.153.255.210] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15LHfg-00014k-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:08:52 -0500
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224])
by atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1143A1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by security.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 23683)
id 1EDCC18738; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:08:50 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Build failure on hppa (at least)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:08:50 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LaMont Jones)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: mule2
Version: 2.3+19.34-18
Priority: serious

Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody.  As the
Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite
likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect.

The following build failure occured on hppa (using gcc 3.0):
See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
information, and some additional information on deciphering the sometimes
cryptic buildd database entries.

If the bug is gcc 3.0 errors, then it is quite likely reproducable on
other platforms.  With gcc 3.0, of course.

If the comment is about config.{guess,sub} then they're out of date,
see the current autotools-dev package.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux smallone 2.4.0-pa51 #44 Sun Jul 1 20:05:11 MDT 2001 
parisc64 unknown

editors/mule2_2.3+19.34-18 by bdale-hppa [optional:uncompiled]
  Reasons for failing:
[Category: none]
checking host system type... Invalid configuration `hppa-debian-linux': 
machine 
`hppa-debian' not recognized
.
configure: error: Emacs hasn't been ported to `' systems.
Check `etc/MACHINES' for recognized configuration names.

---
Received: (at 104812-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 16:01:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 10:01:16 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XP4u-0008CU-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 10:01:16 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-184.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.184] 
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16XP4t-0002Du-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 16:01:16 +
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 
(Debian))
id 16XP4m-0006ah-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 16:01:08 +
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:01:07 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mule2 removed from unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Since mule2 has been removed from unstable, I'm closing the two "can't
build from source" bugs filed against it.

[Date: Sat,  2 Feb 2002 11:37:55 -0500] [ftpmaster: Ryan Murray]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

 mule2 | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | source
 mule2-bin | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
mule2-canna | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
mule2-canna-wnn | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
mule2-plain | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390 
mule2-support | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | all
mule2-supportel | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | all
 mule2-wnn | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
Closed bugs: 119596

--- Reason ---
ROM; obsolete with emacs >19  

--

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#99200: marked as done (can't build on arm)

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:01:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mule2 removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2001 21:49:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 16:49:06 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pc1-camb6-0-cust57.cam.cable.ntl.com 
(kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org) [62.253.135.57] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 154rMQ-0002G0-00; Tue, 29 May 2001 16:49:06 -0500
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=pb)
by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 154rML-0003ff-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 May 2001 22:49:01 +0100
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can't build on arm
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-639668369P";
 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 22:49:01 +0100
From: Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--==_Exmh_-639668369P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Package: mule2
Version: 2.3+19.34-18
Severity: serious

creating cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... arm-debian-linux-gnu
configure: error: Emacs hasn't been ported to `arm-debian-linux-gnu' systems.
Check `etc/MACHINES' for recognized configuration names.
make: *** [debian/stampdir/canna-build] Error 1



--==_Exmh_-639668369P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)

iD8DBQE7FBlNVTLPJe9CT30RAptbAJ9eJVWpgFIUYff485UwtfnP1OqtXQCfUU2W
yXKzIEdWLkhspiX/r4KVC14=
=kk/p
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--==_Exmh_-639668369P--

---
Received: (at 99200-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 16:01:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 10:01:17 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XP4u-0008CU-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 10:01:16 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-184.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.184] 
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16XP4t-0002Du-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 16:01:16 +
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 
(Debian))
id 16XP4m-0006ah-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 16:01:08 +
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:01:07 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mule2 removed from unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Since mule2 has been removed from unstable, I'm closing the two "can't
build from source" bugs filed against it.

[Date: Sat,  2 Feb 2002 11:37:55 -0500] [ftpmaster: Ryan Murray]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

 mule2 | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | source
 mule2-bin | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
mule2-canna | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
mule2-canna-wnn | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
mule2-plain | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390 
mule2-support | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | all
mule2-supportel | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | all
 mule2-wnn | 2.3+19.34-18.1 | i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc, s390
Closed bugs: 119596

--- Reason ---
ROM; obsolete with emacs >19  

--

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 129104

2002-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 129104  patch
Bug#129104: script reading + temp file problems
Tags added: patch

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#129104: bug 129104 (buffer overflow + template reading in cgiemail)

2002-02-03 Thread Colin Watson 
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:54:06PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:42:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes, with the current design there really isn't any way to do it well
> > (including backwards compatibility), only patch it up. I suggest a
> > simple 'templatedir="/foo/bar/baz"' in a trusted place like
> > /etc/cgiemail.conf. That has the advantage that it can be parsed by the
> > shell, so you can easily set it with debconf and not clobber the old
> > setting on upgrades.
> 
> Ok, that sounds as good as anything can be.  Go ahead and write the code
> (or does there need to be more planning?); I'll do the debconf stuff +
> make up a sane default template telling people what to do when cgiemail
> stops working.  Templates should live in /usr/share/cgiemail, right?
> 'Cause they're architecture-independent.
> 
> Don't forget not to let people do something like "GET
> /cgi-bin/cgiemail/../../../etc/passwd" :-)

OK, here's some code which I believe does the job. The parser is hardly
elegant, but, as the configuration file is presumably in a trusted
location, that isn't a security problem. Please try this out and see how
it goes.

Sorry for the delay in putting this together.

--- cgiemail-1.6.orig/cgilib.c
+++ cgiemail-1.6/cgilib.c
@@ -461,6 +461,59 @@
 }
 
 int
+cgi_read_configuration(formp, templatedir, templatedirlen)
+ cgi_form *formp;
+ char *templatedir;
+ int templatedirlen;
+{
+  FILE *cfp;
+  char *linebuf;
+  int linebuflen;
+  char *directive = "templatedir=\"";
+  int directivelen = strlen(directive);
+
+  cfp = fopen(TEMPLATECONF, "r");
+  if (!cfp)
+{
+  formp->errcond = 1;
+  strcpy(formp->errmsg, "500 Could not open configuration file");
+  cgi_concat_errno(formp->errmsg);
+#ifdef DISCLOSE_PATHS
+  strncpy(formp->errinfo, TEMPLATECONF, CGI_ERRMSG_MAX);
+#else
+  strcpy(formp->errinfo, "Configuration file could not be accessed.");
+#endif /* DISCLOSE_PATHS */
+  return(1);
+}
+
+  linebuflen = templatedirlen + directivelen + 2;
+  linebuf = (char *) malloc(linebuflen + 1);
+  while (fgets(linebuf, linebuflen - 1, cfp))
+{
+  if (!strncmp(linebuf, directive, directivelen))
+   {
+ char *inquotes = linebuf + directivelen;
+ char *endquotes = strchr(inquotes, '"');
+ if (endquotes)
+   {
+ strncpy(templatedir, inquotes, endquotes - inquotes);
+ return(0);
+   }
+   }
+}
+
+  formp->errcond = 1;
+  strcpy(formp->errmsg,
+"500 Could not find templatedir in configuration file");
+#ifdef DISCLOSE_PATHS
+  strncpy(formp->errinfo, TEMPLATECONF, CGI_ERRMSG_MAX);
+#else
+  strcpy(formp->errinfo, "No templatedir=\"...\" line in configuration file.");
+#endif /* DISCLOSE_PATHS */
+  return(1);
+}
+
+int
 cgi_template_fill(formp, templatefile)
  cgi_form *formp;
  char *templatefile;
@@ -468,6 +521,7 @@
   FILE *tfp;
   char varname[CGI_VARNAME_MAX];
   char formatstr[CGI_VARNAME_MAX];
+  char templatedir[CGI_VARNAME_MAX];
   int varnamelen=0, formatlen=0, nfound=0, substitutions=0;
   int inchar, parse_state=0;
 
@@ -475,6 +529,22 @@
 
   char *envval;
 #endif /* ENABLE_CGIENV */
+
+  if (cgi_read_configuration(formp, templatedir, CGI_VARNAME_MAX - 1))
+return(1);
+
+  if (strncmp(templatefile, templatedir, strlen(templatedir)) ||
+  strstr(templatefile, "/../"))
+{
+  formp->errcond=1;
+  strcpy(formp->errmsg, "403 Template not in valid directory");
+#ifdef DISCLOSE_PATHS
+  strncpy(formp->errinfo, templatefile, CGI_ERRMSG_MAX);
+#else
+  strcpy(formp->errinfo, "Template file could not be accessed.");
+#endif /* DISCLOSE_PATHS */
+  return(1);
+}
 
   /* open template file */
   tfp = fopen(templatefile, "r");
--- cgiemail-1.6.orig/debian/rules
+++ cgiemail-1.6/debian/rules
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 configure-stamp:
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
-   ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man 
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
+   ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man 
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
 
touch configure-stamp
 
--- cgiemail-1.6.orig/Makefile.in
+++ cgiemail-1.6/Makefile.in
@@ -4,6 +4,11 @@
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
+TEMPLATECONF=$(sysconfdir)/cgiemail.conf
+CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -DTEMPLATECONF="\"$(TEMPLATECONF)\""
+
 PROG=cgiemail cgiecho cgifile cgicso
 
 DISTFILES=README ChangeLog *.[ch] configure *.in testce.txt

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]