±±¾©ÃûδÃû½ÌÓýÎÄ»¯·¢Õ¹ÖÐÐÄ2003ÄêMBA¿¼Ç°¸¨µ¼°àÕÐÉú¼òÕÂ
Bug#110331: This bug seems done now
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Current practice is to simply close bugs in packages maintained by the > QA group once they've been dealt with, rather than regarding them as > NMUs. A new maintainer taking over the package will have to start from > the most recent version in the archive anyway. Oh, of course; I forgot this was a QA upload. Yeah, closing the bug is peachy by me.
Bug#133970: voberon cannot build from sources on ia64
Here's the config.log from the build on ia64 (caballero.debian.org).
Since oo2c is segfaulting, perhaps this bug should be reassigned there?
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:531: checking for oo2c
configure:636: checking initialization file
configure:650: checking installation directory
configure:674: checking for ooconfig
configure:695: checking for library support
configure:749: checking for a BSD compatible install
configure:804: checking for module X11.Mod
configure:830: oo2c -Mv -O --libs conftest.Mod 1>&5
./configure: line 1: 20093 Segmentation fault $OOC -Mv $OFLAGS --libs ""
conftest.$ooc_ext 1>&5
configure: failed program was:
#line 817 "configure"
char XOpenDisplay();
int test_fct() {
XOpenDisplay(); return 0; }
MODULE conftest [INTERFACE "C"; LINK FILE "conftest.c" END];
IMPORT dummy:=Strings, Strings, X11;
END conftest.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 61782 important Bug#61782: voberon: can't build on alpha Severity set to `important'. > severity 133970 important Bug#133970: voberon cannot build from sources on ia64 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#110331: This bug seems done now
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:09:38PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > microwindows (0.88pre11-4) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * NMU > > * Fix libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg and libmicrowindows0-x11-dbg dependencies. > > (Closes: #121459) > > > > -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:04:42 > > -0800 > > Yes, but it's an NMU, so we leave the bug open until the maintainer > fixes it in his source. Current practice is to simply close bugs in packages maintained by the QA group once they've been dealt with, rather than regarding them as NMUs. A new maintainer taking over the package will have to start from the most recent version in the archive anyway. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 78965 grave Bug#78965: [Fwd: Trivial bug in package zope-pythonmethod] Severity set to `grave'. > merge 76051 78965 Bug#76051: It is marked as broken: Couldn't find zbytecodehacks.VSExec Bug#78965: [Fwd: Trivial bug in package zope-pythonmethod] Merged 76051 78965. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: severity of 135869 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 135869 wishlist Bug#135869: russian template file [zope-emarket] Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Downgrading
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 118969 normal Bug#118969: zope-pythonmethod is not installable in unstable Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#110331: marked as done (libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg is not installable in unstable)
Your message dated Mon, 4 Mar 2002 02:26:20 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This bug seems done now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2001 21:01:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 27 16:01:56 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15bTW8-ud-00; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:01:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 11032 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 21:01:55 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 21:01:55 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15bTVj-0006BM-00; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 23:01:31 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg is not installable in unstable X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 23:01:31 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg Version: 0.88pre11-2 Severity: grave # apt-get install libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg: Depends: libmicrowindows0 (= 0.88pre11-2) E: Sorry, broken packages -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de 2.4.9-ac2 #1 Mon Aug 27 19:45:33 CEST 2001 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 110331-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2002 02:26:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 03 20:26:53 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16hiBh-000719-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 20:26:53 -0600 Received: from host217-35-46-127.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.127] helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at) by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 16hiBg-0002DV-00; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 02:26:52 + Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16hiBA-0006cW-00; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 02:26:20 + Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 02:26:20 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: This bug seems done now Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Judging by this: Package: libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg Version: 0.88pre11-4 Architecture: i386 Depends: libmicrowindows0-fb (= 0.88pre11-4), libc6-dev Package: libmicrowindows0-x11-dbg Version: 0.88pre11-4 Architecture: i386 Depends: libmicrowindows0-x11 (= 0.88pre11-4), libc6-dev ... the bug is fixed now, presumably by this change: microwindows (0.88pre11-4) unstable; urgency=low * NMU * Fix libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg and libmicrowindows0-x11-dbg dependencies. (Closes: #121459) -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:04:42 -0800 Let me know if I've made a mistake. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#124200: svgalib-bin: spelling in package description
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 124200 minor Bug#124200: svgalib-bin: spelling in package description Severity set to `minor'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#127933: microwindows: microwindows source is organized wrong
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 127933 wishlist Bug#127933: microwindows: microwindows source is organized wrong Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: severity of 128930 is minor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 128930 minor Bug#128930: incorrect links in man page Severity set to `minor'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: severity of 128357 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 128357 wishlist Bug#128357: seaview: new upstream version from 2001-11-19 Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#127933: microwindows: microwindows source is organized wrong
severity 127933 wishlist thanks Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > The microwindows source is organized wrongly. The .orig.tar.gz file > contains itself another .tar.gz, and a set of patches. This is so wrong, > it doesn't even begin to deserve mention. But whoever adopts this package > really *must* reorganize the source to be more sane. This just looks like DBS to me. Not everybody likes it (I don't, really), but considering that packages like libc6, xfree86, and apache use similar schemes I don't think that it's actually a bug. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#124200: svgalib-bin: spelling in package description
severity 124200 minor thanks Rather than saying "without going through X Window", I'd prefer something like "without going through the X Window System". Also, I'm not sure that the second part of your report is correct. As far as I know, "graphics modes" is a common phrase in English, and "graphics" there is a noun, not an adjective (i.e. "modes of graphics"). -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mpsql_2.1-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: mpsql_2.1-12.diff.gz to pool/non-free/m/mpsql/mpsql_2.1-12.diff.gz mpsql_2.1-12.dsc to pool/non-free/m/mpsql/mpsql_2.1-12.dsc mpsql_2.1-12_i386.deb to pool/non-free/m/mpsql/mpsql_2.1-12_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 136431 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
