Bug#91633: marked as done (Package quickppp still has at least one file in /usr/doc)
Your message dated 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 07:58:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 01:58:01 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c1494421-a.alntn1.tx.home.com (localhost) [24.4.56.213] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14hRt2-00084D-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:58:00 -0600 Received: from adam by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14hRrJ-0004gC-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:56:13 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package quickppp still has at least one file in /usr/doc Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:56:13 -0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: quickppp Version: 1.0-1, as in unstable on March 24 According to the Contents file for unstable, quickppp contains at least one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/ instead. Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant documentation location so woody can ship with its documentation in a consistent, FHS compliant state. Thank you. [ This bug report was automatically generated. ] --- Received: (at 91633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 04:35:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 23:35:24 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16y3dj-0006zk-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:35:24 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA07359 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:35:14 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fuzz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.87]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07262; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:46 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3ar-R5-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:32:25 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 Date: 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 13 Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that quickppp is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed. Here is the relevant changelog entry: quickppp (1.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-Maintainer upload * Made package FHS compliant (Closes: Bug#91008, Bug#91633) * New upstream release (Closes: Bug#94258) * Not a native package (Closes: Bug#44292) * Added a slightly better man page -- Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:28:39 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#94258: marked as done (quickppp: new upstream version)
Your message dated 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2001 15:34:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 17 10:34:33 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from portal2.mindmaker.hu [194.152.134.18] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14pXUu-0001q0-00; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:34:32 -0500 Received: by portal2.mindmaker.hu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0CEF85669; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from algernon by gnagy with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14pXW2-0004jD-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:35:42 +0200 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:35:42 +0200 From: Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quickppp: new upstream version Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i Organization: The MadHouse Project Sender: Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: quickppp Version: 1.0-1 Severity: normal There is a new upstream version (1.2.0), please update this package. Thanks, Gergely Nagy \ mhp/|8] --- Received: (at 94258-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 04:35:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 23:35:28 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16y3do-000706-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:35:28 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA07376 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:35:18 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fuzz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.87]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07262; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:46 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3ar-R5-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:32:25 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 Date: 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 13 Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that quickppp is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed. Here is the relevant changelog entry: quickppp (1.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-Maintainer upload * Made package FHS compliant (Closes: Bug#91008, Bug#91633) * New upstream release (Closes: Bug#94258) * Not a native package (Closes: Bug#44292) * Added a slightly better man page -- Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:28:39 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#44292: marked as done (this package is not native)
Your message dated 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 1999 03:23:06 + Received: (qmail 14216 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 03:23:01 - Received: from adsl-63-193-116-241.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO kitenet.net) (63.193.116.241) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 03:23:01 - Received: (qmail 30490 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 1999 03:22:22 - Date: 5 Sep 1999 03:22:22 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: this package is not native Package: quickppp Version: debian unstable as of 4 Sep 99 It seems that quickppp is not really a debian native package; examination of the copyright file shows that the sources for it were obtained from elsewhere, not written by a debian developer. And yet, in the debian archive, there is only a quickppp.tar.gz, not a quickppp.orig.tar.gz. Any package that's not a native package is supposed to have a .orig.tar.gz file and an accompanying .diff.gz file that contains any debian changes. (See section 3.3 of the policy manual for details.) This has a number of benefits, including letting people see what changes were made for debian, and making it easy to apply those changes to new upstream versions of the package. Please download the pristine upstream source of quickppp, and use it to create a .orig.tar.gz file, and then rebuild your package with "dpkg-buildpackage -sa" so that the .orig.tar.gz file will be uploaded to the debian archive. (I realize there might be situtations where doing that is not possible, or I may have misidentified your package as having this problem when it is really a native package. If so, simply close this semi-autogenerated bug report.) --- Received: (at 44292-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 04:35:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 23:35:16 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16y3dc-0006zQ-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:35:16 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA07338 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:35:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fuzz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.87]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07262; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:46 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3ar-R5-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:32:25 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 Date: 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 13 Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that quickppp is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed. Here is the relevant changelog entry: quickppp (1.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-Maintainer upload * Made package FHS compliant (Closes: Bug#91008, Bug#91633) * New upstream release (Closes: Bug#94258) * Not a native package (Closes: Bug#44292) * Added a slightly better man page -- Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:28:39 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#91008: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)
Your message dated 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2001 00:02:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 24 18:02:32 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [198.144.200.155] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14gxzM-0007Mh-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 18:02:32 -0600 Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5755DBC029; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:02:24 -0800 (PST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:02:24 -0800 (PST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: quickppp Version: as in unstable on March 24th According to the Contents file for unstable, quickppp contains at least one file in /usr/man/. That directory is deprecated, and policy says that packages should place man pages in /usr/share/man/ instead. Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant manual page location so woody can ship with its man pages in a consistent, FHS compliant state. Thank you. [ This bug report was automatically generated. ] --- Received: (at 91008-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 04:35:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 23:35:20 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16y3df-0006za-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:35:19 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA07349 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:35:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fuzz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.87]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07262; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:46 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3ar-R5-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:32:25 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.1 Date: 17 Apr 2002 22:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 13 Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that quickppp is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed. Here is the relevant changelog entry: quickppp (1.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-Maintainer upload * Made package FHS compliant (Closes: Bug#91008, Bug#91633) * New upstream release (Closes: Bug#94258) * Not a native package (Closes: Bug#44292) * Added a slightly better man page -- Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:28:39 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#109409: marked as done (quickppp: recommends pppd, which doesn't exist)
Your message dated 17 Apr 2002 22:34:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 19:55:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 14:55:34 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Yv93-00025r-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:34 -0500 Received: from [217.35.24.151] (helo=arborlon.riva.ucam.org) by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #9) id 15Yv8y-0001pJ-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:55:29 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15Yv8c-0004i9-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:55:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:55:05 +0100 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: quickppp: recommends pppd, which doesn't exist Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23 Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: quickppp Version: 1.2.0-1.1 Severity: serious Hi, quickppp recommends pppd, which doesn't exist. Do you mean ppp (which contains /usr/sbin/pppd)? Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 109409-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 04:35:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 23:35:04 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16y3dQ-0006yg-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:35:04 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA07287 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fuzz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.87]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07208 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:29 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3ar-R6-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:32:25 +0200 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.2 Date: 17 Apr 2002 22:34:59 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 11 Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that quickppp is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed. Here is the relevant changelog entry: quickppp (1.2.0-1.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Recommend ppp rather than pppd (closes: #109409). * Remove user emacs settings from this changelog (lintian). -- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:00:27 + -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#129919: marked as done (langdrill segfaults with default /etc/langdrillrc)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:17:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#129919: fixed in langdrill 0.2.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2002 05:30:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 18 23:30:59 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16Ro5f-0002og-00; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:30:55 -0600 Received: (qmail 29460 invoked by uid 0); 19 Jan 2002 05:30:22 - Received: from b0b3c.pppool.de (HELO jumpgate.thevoid.net) (213.7.11.60) by mail.gmx.net (mp011-rz3) with SMTP; 19 Jan 2002 05:30:22 - Received: from moongate.thevoid.net ([192.168.3.199]) by jumpgate.thevoid.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16Ro53-0001VG-00; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:30:17 +0100 Received: from co by moongate.thevoid.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Ro51-0003aa-00; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:30:15 +0100 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:30:15 +0100 From: Christian Ohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: langdrill segfaults with default /etc/langdrillrc Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213 Organization: theVoid X-Operating-System: Linux moongate 2.4.17 Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: langdrill Version: 0.2.1-4 Severity: important hi. on my system langdrill segfaults when the default config file /etc/langdrillrc exists. renaming/removing this file fixed it. bye -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux moongate 2.4.17 #1 Sat Dec 22 22:39:29 CET 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP Versions of packages langdrill depends on: ii gdk-imlib11.9.11-3 Gdk-Imlib is an imaging library fo ii libart2 1.4.1.3-1 The Gnome canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.3-1The Audiofile Library ii libc6 2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb33.2.9-14 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd-alsa0 0.2.23-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0]0.2.23-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libglib1.21.2.10-3 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome321.4.1.3-1 The Gnome libraries ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.1.3-1 The Gnome libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.1.3-1 The Gnome libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-9 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libsigc++01.0.4-2Typesafe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.4-1 The GNU stdc++ library ii libvdk1 1.2.5-6The Visual Development Kit C++ lib ii xlibs 4.1.0-13 X Window System client libraries -- Little Known Facts, #23: Did you know... that if you dial 911 in Los Angeles you get the BMW repair garage? --- Received: (at 129919-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 00:24:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 19:24:08 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xzia-0002s3-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:24:08 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xzbx-0002bO-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:17:17 -0400 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $ Subject: Bug#129919: fixed in langdrill 0.2.1-6 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:17:17 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of langdrill, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: langdrill_0.2.1-6.dsc to pool/main/l/langdrill/langdrill_0.2.1-6.dsc langdrill_0.2.1-6.tar.gz to pool/main/l/langdrill/langdrill_0.2.1-6.tar.gz langdrill_0.2.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/l/langdrill/langdrill_0.2.1-6_i386.deb A summary of the
Bug#138995: libcw: text entry widget duplicates characters during quick typing
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:49:23PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:06:38AM +, xsdg wrote: > > I usually type between 60 and 80 words per minute. As I use cooledit > > to edit my LaTeX documents, I use it quite often. Sometimes, when I > > press a key in the main text edit widget in cooledit, it prints the > > previously-entered character (or, sometimes, the character before > > that) in place of the character which I pressed. This occurs > > consistently, although not at every keypress. Also, the problem > > happens most notably during inter-word spaces. > > Just by way of a data point, I can't reproduce this at all (using the > same versions of cooledit and libcw). Perhaps this is an X server bug? > I've occasionally noticed keystrokes being duplicated in a variety of X > clients recently when the system is under moderate to heavy load. What video card do you have? So far I've noticed this kind of thing at work, where I have an i810 card. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
langdrill_0.2.1-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: langdrill_0.2.1-6.dsc to pool/main/l/langdrill/langdrill_0.2.1-6.dsc langdrill_0.2.1-6.tar.gz to pool/main/l/langdrill/langdrill_0.2.1-6.tar.gz langdrill_0.2.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/l/langdrill/langdrill_0.2.1-6_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 129919 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#6345: marked as done (dome: no man pages for dome(1) and dxftopov(1))
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:02:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#6345: fixed in dome 4.60-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 1996 21:04:25 + Received: (qmail 30216 invoked from network); 31 Dec 1996 21:04:25 - Received: from quechua.inka.de (HELO mail.ka.inka.de) (193.197.84.5) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 1996 21:04:25 - Received: from uu.inka.de ([193.197.84.8]) by mail.ka.inka.de with smtp id m0vfBEq-0004ITC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Tue, 31 Dec 1996 21:56:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from dungeon.inka.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by uu.inka.de with bsmtp (S3.1.29.1) id ; Tue, 31 Dec 96 21:56 MET Received: by dungeon.inka.de id m0vfAys-00018CC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Tue, 31 Dec 1996 21:40:14 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 21:40:14 +0100 (MET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Jellinghaus) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: deb-check 0.2 report on /var/pub/debian/bo/binary-i386/math/dome_4.60-1.deb X-Debian-Check: 0.2 /var/pub/debian/bo/binary-i386/math/dome_4.60-1.deb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: dome Version: 4.60-1 bug: usr/bin/dome without manpage bug: usr/bin/dxftopov without manpage warning: usr/doc/dome/changelog : no such file --- Received: (at 6345-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2002 21:08:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 16:08:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xweo-0002So-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:08:02 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xwZ7-0007Xq-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:02:09 -0400 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $ Subject: Bug#6345: fixed in dome 4.60-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:02:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dome, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dome_4.60-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dome/dome_4.60-3.diff.gz dome_4.60-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dome/dome_4.60-3.dsc dome_4.60-3_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dome/dome_4.60-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dome package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:31:40 +0100 Source: dome Binary: dome Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.60-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: dome - calculates and draws geodesic domes Closes: 6345 Changes: dome (4.60-3) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Add man pages for dome(1) and dxftopov(1), based on the existing documentation (closes: #6345). Files: b4126e09fdbebf2f1ffb42e1aa330f8d 617 math optional dome_4.60-3.dsc c051f638732dcd65805c3ed25cf33cc0 4458 math optional dome_4.60-3.diff.gz a24ae79c203d3d77ad2318c4624c2c44 35474 math optional dome_4.60-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian developer iD8DBQE8vd7g9t0zAhD6TNERAhQxAJ0ca1Jm8Hci5QELY/ZARGBqGjwjBgCghOio 3QVzWyk7jvNMyI/kBWpZMNs= =phsl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dome_4.60-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: dome_4.60-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dome/dome_4.60-3.diff.gz dome_4.60-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dome/dome_4.60-3.dsc dome_4.60-3_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dome/dome_4.60-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 6345 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quickppp_1.2.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: quickppp_1.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/q/quickppp/quickppp_1.2.1-1.diff.gz quickppp_1.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/q/quickppp/quickppp_1.2.1-1.dsc quickppp_1.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/q/quickppp/quickppp_1.2.1-1_i386.deb quickppp_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/q/quickppp/quickppp_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 136035 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: nasm generates incorrect addresses in certain circumstances
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen #136525 Bug#136525: nasm generates incorrect addresses in certain circumstancesw Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#142085: FTBFS: Build failure of voberon on i386
reassign 142085 imlib-dev thanks On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:55:57PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > voberon fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build. > > I am just filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your > package from source, using a very simplistic program called pbuilder. > > > Build log follows: > === > mv -f .libs/VOUsePrefs.lo VOUsePrefs.lo > /usr/bin/libtool gcc -o liboo2c_vo.la -version-info 0:0:0 -rpath /usr/lib > -L/usr/lib VOPrefs.lo VOLLMac.lo VOEvent.lo VOUtil.lo VODragDrop.lo > VOPrefsScanner.lo VOObject.lo VODataStreamModel.lo VOFunctionModel.lo > VOTableModel.lo VOTreeModel.lo VOValue.lo VOPrefsParser.lo VOTextViewModel.lo > VODisplay.lo VOGUIObject.lo VOArray.lo VOButtonRow.lo VOColorArea.lo > VODrawTest.lo VOFrame.lo VOFuelGauge.lo VOImage.lo VOKeyHandler.lo VOLED.lo > VOLightChain.lo VOMulti.lo VOOszil.lo VOPanel.lo VOPatternLegend.lo > VOPieChart.lo VOPlate.lo VOPlot.lo VOPopup.lo VOPower.lo VOQuickHelp.lo > VOScale.lo VOSegment.lo VOLoad.lo VOSegment7.lo VODigiClock.lo VOSpace.lo > VOStatusLine.lo VOString.lo VOStringClock.lo VOTab.lo VOTextView.lo > VOToolbar.lo VOVecImage.lo VOBool.lo VOCycle.lo VOLine.lo VOPane.lo > VORadio.lo VOSlider.lo VOText.lo VOButton.lo VOClock.lo VOFrameGroup.lo > VOLabel.lo VOListModel.lo VOMenu.lo VOScroller.lo VOList.lo VOTable.lo > VOTree.lo VOWindow.lo VOColSelDlg.lo VOWindowGroup.lo VOFrmSelD! > lg.lo VOImgSelDlg.lo VOMsgDialog.lo VOPrefsGUI.lo VOBoolPrefs.lo > VODisplayPrefs.lo VOFuelGaugePrefs.lo VOLightChainPrefs.lo VOListPrefs.lo > VOLoadPrefs.lo VOPopupPrefs.lo VOPowerPrefs.lo VOQuickHelpPrefs.lo > VORadioPrefs.lo VOScrollerPrefs.lo VOStringPrefs.lo VOTablePrefs.lo > VOWireFrame.lo VOBackground.lo VOButtonPrefs.lo VOButtonRowPrefs.lo > VOClockPrefs.lo VOCyclePrefs.lo VOLabelPrefs.lo VOMenuPrefs.lo > VOOszilPrefs.lo VOSliderPrefs.lo VOStatusLinePrefs.lo VOTextPrefs.lo > VOToolbarPrefs.lo VOArrayPrefs.lo VODigiClockPrefs.lo VOFrameGroupPrefs.lo > VOMultiPrefs.lo VOPanelPrefs.lo VOTabPrefs.lo VOWindowGroupPrefs.lo > VOUsePrefs.lo -loo2c_x11 -lImlib -lgif -lpng -ltiff -ljpeg -lz -lm -lXext > -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lSM -lICE -lX11 -loo2c > grep: /usr/lib/libgtk.la: No such file or directory [etc.] This looks like a bug in imlib-dev to me. libgtk isn't mentioned in the link line above. However, it's mentioned in /usr/lib/libImlib.la (under dependency_libs), so I think imlib-dev needs to mirror the dependencies of imlib1 and depend on libglib1.2-dev and libgtk1.2-dev. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#142085: FTBFS: Build failure of voberon on i386
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 142085 imlib-dev Bug#142085: FTBFS: Build failure of voberon on i386 Bug reassigned from package `voberon' to `imlib-dev'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#136525: marked as done (nasm generates incorrect addresses in certain circumstancesw)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#136525: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2002 02:34:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 02 20:34:57 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.38] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16hLpx-0003BJ-00; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 20:34:57 -0600 Received: from tal26.joh.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.237.142] helo=theseus.acropolis.ucam.org) by mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16hLpv-0002YS-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 02:34:55 + Received: from [131.111.237.172] (helo=tal26a.joh.cam.ac.uk) by theseus.acropolis.ucam.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16hLpq-0004zS-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 02:34:50 + Received: by tal26a.joh.cam.ac.uk (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 3 Mar 2002 02:34:58 + From: "Tom Lees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: nasm generates incorrect addresses in certain circumstancesw X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44 Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 02:34:58 + Bcc: Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: nasm Version: 0.98.08-1 Severity: normal Hmm... took me almost an hour to track this one down after my (small) OS kept crashing VMware for no apparent reason. Assemble the following two files to ELF objects: --- CUT f1.asm --- struc s1 .s11resd 1 endstruc bits 32 section .stext exec t1: mov eax,[sbss_1] section .data section .bss resb 0x2000 global sbss_1 sbss_1 resd 1 --- END CUT f1.asm --- --- CUT f2.asm --- bits 32 section .text extern sbss_1 t2: mov eax,[sbss_1] --- END CUT f2.asm --- ...and link them to an executable. You will find that the address used for sbss_1 in f1.o is out by 0x2000 (or whatever you change the 0x2000 to in f1.asm above), for example: Script started on Sun Mar 3 02:20:35 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/proj/t$ nasm -felf f1.asm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/proj/t$ nasm -felf f2.asm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/proj/t$ ld -o test f1.o f2.o ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 08048080 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/proj/t$ objdump --disassemble test test: file format elf32-i386 Disassembly of section .text: 08048080 : 8048080: a1 8c b0 04 08 mov0x804b08c,%eax ^ Disassembly of section .stext: 08048085 : 8048085: a1 8c d0 04 08 mov0x804d08c,%eax ^ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/proj/t$ Furthermore, this bug occurs ONLY when a structure is defined at the top of f1.asm as above - if the structure is defined after section .stext is introduced, or the structure is not defined at all then the bug does not appear (although adding section .other before the structure does not stop the bug from occuring). Neither does it appear if we rename the section .stext to .text. The "section .data" line is also required to trigger the bug. I am afraid I have absolutely no idea what is causing this. It could well be a bug in ld (binutils 2.11.93.0.2-2), I don't know. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cronos 2.4.18 #2 Thu Feb 28 21:55:26 GMT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages nasm depends on: ii libc6 2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 136525-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2002 11:38:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 06:38:23 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xnlX-00048z-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:38:23 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xnfW-0005re-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 From: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $ Subject: Bug#136525: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nasm, which is due
Bug#136263: marked as done (nasm undocumented syntax change in 0.98.08)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#136263: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2002 01:27:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 19:27:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16gbpi-0005jF-00; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 19:27:38 -0600
Received: (qmail 14439 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2002 01:27:06 -
Received: from viking.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se (193.11.232.150)
by mail.gmx.net (mp014-rz3) with SMTP; 1 Mar 2002 01:27:06 -
Received: from felix by viking.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se with local (Exim 3.34
#1 (Debian))
id 16gbpC-0002G8-00; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 02:27:06 +0100
From: "Felix Kühling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nasm undocumented syntax change in 0.98.08
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.43
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.43
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 02:27:06 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Felix_K=FChling?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nasm
Version: 0.98.08-1
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux viking 2.4.17 #32 Son Feb 24 22:21:14 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages nasm depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
When I was trying to compile lame 3.91 libmp3lame/i386/scalar.nas did not
compile. The following kind of lines produced parser errors (line numbers
added by me):
14: procscalar04_float32_i387
15: %$p arg 4
16: %$q arg 4
17: ...
Error messages:
scalar.nas:15: error: parser: instruction expected
scalar.nas:16: error: parser: instruction expected
As I found out on the lame mailing list there was a change in the syntax from
a previous version to 0.98.08 without a notice in the docs.
---
Received: (at 136263-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2002 11:38:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 06:38:46 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xnlt-0004A8-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:38:45 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xnfW-0005rc-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400
From: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $
Subject: Bug#136263: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nasm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz
nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc
nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb
nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nasm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:28:43 +0200
Source: nasm
Binary: nasm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.98.28bf-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
nasm - General-purpose x86 assembler
Closes: 122295 128498 132755 136263 136525
Changes:
nasm (0.98.28bf-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New maintainer
* New upstream release; switched back to the bugfixed ("bf") branch
(closes: #136263)
* ndisasm segfaults no longer on "damn
Bug#132755: marked as done (nasm: breaks "arg" macro in c16.mac)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#132755: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2002 14:38:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 07 08:38:44 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp02.mem.interq.net [210.157.1.52] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16YphC-0004GL-00; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 08:38:43 -0600 Received: from grain (kyoto-ppp-210-172-160-62.interq.or.jp [210.172.160.62]) by smtp02.mem.interq.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA24141 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 23:38:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=oohara) by grain with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Ypi6-00062g-00; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 23:39:38 +0900 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 23:04:24 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nasm: breaks "arg" macro in c16.mac X-Debbugs-CC: Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1.52 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: nasm Version: 0.98.08-1 Severity: normal The macro "arg" in c16.mac (found in the source code tarball) doesn't expand. Try: ; c16.mac ; NASM macro set to make interfacing to 16-bit programs easier -*- nasm -*- %imacro proc 1 ; begin a procedure definition %push proc global %1 %1: push bp mov bp,sp %ifdef FARCODE PASCAL ; arguments may start at bp+4 or bp+6 %assign %$arg 6 %define %$firstarg 6 %else %assign %$arg 4 %define %$firstarg 4 %endif %define %$procname %1 %endmacro %imacro arg 0-1 2 ; used with the argument name as a label %00 equ %$arg ; we could possibly be adding some ; debug information at this point...? %assign %$arg %1+%$arg %endmacro %imacro endproc 0 %ifnctx proc %error Mismatched `endproc'/`proc' %else mov sp,bp pop bp %ifdef PASCAL retf %$arg - %$firstarg %elifdef FARCODE retf %else retn %endif __end_%$procname: ; useful for calculating function size %pop %endif %endmacro ; example from the NASM Manual, section 7.4.5 proc _nearproc %$i arg %$j arg mov ax,[bp + %$i] mov bx,[bp + %$j] add ax,[bx] endproc $ nasm -e c16.nas | egrep arg [EMAIL PROTECTED] arg [EMAIL PROTECTED] arg The potato version of nasm can treat this file properly. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux grain 2.4.16 #1 Thu Jan 10 00:18:21 JST 2002 i686 unknown Versions of the packages nasm depends on: hi libc6 2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone --- Received: (at 132755-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2002 11:38:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 06:38:45 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xnls-0004A1-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:38:45 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xnfW-0005ra-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 From: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $ Subject: Bug#132755: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nasm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.
Bug#128498: marked as done (nasm: ndisasm segfaults on some files)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#128498: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2002 22:02:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 09 16:02:33 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dclient217-162-54-57.hispeed.ch (sunshine.mine.nu) [217.162.54.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16OQno-0006rb-00; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 16:02:33 -0600 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (helo=southpole) by sunshine.mine.nu with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16OQtJ-00041T-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 23:08:13 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:58:13 +0100 From: gurkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nasm: ndisasm segfaults on some files Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: www.linuks.mine.nu X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6claws36 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: nasm Version: 0.98.08-1 Severity: normal ndisasm -e3 fewfilesofmine.rom gives few lines of assembly and mostly segfaults at about line 24 (find them on www.linuks.mine.nu/ree/) # ndisasm -e3 aha2940.rom E9CA26jmp 0x26cd 0003 add [bx+si],al 0005 add [bx+si],al 0007 add [bx+si],al 0009 add [bx+si],al 000B add [bx+si],al 000D add [bx+si],al 000F add [bx+si],al 0011 add [bx+si],al 0013 add [bx+si],al 0015 4Ddec bp 0016 004164add [bx+di+0x64],al 0019 61popa 001A 7074 jo 0x90 001C 656320arpl [gs:bx+si],sp 001F 42inc dx 0020 49dec cx 0021 4Fdec di 0022 53push bx 0023 3A4148cmp al,[bx+di+0x48] 0026 41inc cx 0027 2D3239sub ax,0x3932 002A 3430 xor al,0x30 002C 0116436F add [0x6f43],dx 0030 7079 jo 0xab 0032 7269 jc 0x9d 0034 67db 0x67 Segmentation fault kind regards gürkan -- Windoze not found: (C)heer, (P)arty or (D)ance? --- Received: (at 128498-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2002 11:38:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 06:38:24 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xnlX-000494-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:38:24 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16xnfW-0005rY-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 From: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $ Subject: Bug#128498: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nasm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nasm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:28:43 +0200 Source: nasm Binary: nasm Architecture: so
Bug#122295: marked as done (nasm: Case-sensitive bug in [ORG] directive)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122295: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2001 20:59:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 03 14:59:45 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.aurum-industries.com) [24.196.63.114]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16B0Bl-0008Ph-00; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 14:59:45 -0600
Received: from wufei.aurum-industries.com (ip005.c001.lan [192.168.1.5])
by mail.aurum-industries.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8207077C49; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:03:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: from guy by wufei.aurum-industries.com with local (Exim 3.32 #1
(Debian))
id 16B0O1-0001dn-00; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 15:12:25 -0600
From: GT Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nasm: Case-sensitive bug in [ORG] directive
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.38
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.38
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 15:12:24 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Guy T. Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nasm
Version: 0.98.08-1
Severity: minor
The following used to compile fine:
[ORG 0x7C00]
...but now reports an error:
bootblock.asm:17: error: unrecognised directive [ORG]
...but this is rather minor since the following compiles fine:
[org 0x7C00]
Don't ask me why...
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wufei 2.4.7 #1 Thu Sep 6 20:47:58 CDT 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages nasm depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---
Received: (at 122295-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2002 11:38:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 17 06:38:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xnlZ-000496-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 06:38:25 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xnfW-0005rW-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400
From: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.13 $
Subject: Bug#122295: fixed in nasm 0.98.28bf-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nasm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.diff.gz
nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1.dsc
nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf-1_i386.deb
nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.28bf.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nasm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:28:43 +0200
Source: nasm
Binary: nasm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.98.28bf-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christian Kesselheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
nasm - General-purpose x86 assembler
Closes: 122295 128498 132755 136263 136525
Changes:
nasm (0.98.28bf-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New maintainer
* New upstream release; switched back to the bugfixed ("bf") branch
(closes: #136263)
* ndisasm segfaults no longer on "damn near any file" (closes: #128498)
* Broken macros fixed (closes: #132755)
* The "org" directive is no longer case sensitive :-) (closes: #122295)
* Nasm should not generate wrong addresses in some .text situations
any more (closes: #136525)
Files:
eec0a7d50e0498659dc6d
Bug#143129: fixed
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: aktion | 4:2.2.2-4 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 dcethreads |2.0.2-6 | source dcl | 20010406-2 | source, all eventfolder | 1.32-0.1 | source freedce |1.1.0-4 | source freedce-dceidl |1.1.0-4 | i386, powerpc freedce-doc |1.1.0-4 | all freedce-rpcd |1.1.0-4 | i386, powerpc freedce-uuid |1.1.0-4 | i386, powerpc gdl | 0.1.0.cvs20011016-3.1 | source giram | 0.1.12-1 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 gnome-build | 0.0.2.cvs20011016-3.1 | source gnome-debug | 0.1.6.cvs20011016-2.2 | source kicq | 2.0.0b3-20010313-2 | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libdcethreads-dev |2.0.2-6 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libdcethreads2 |2.0.2-6 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libfreedce |1.1.0-4 | i386, powerpc libfreedce-dev |1.1.0-4 | i386, powerpc libgbf-dev | 0.0.2.cvs20011016-3.1 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libgbf0 | 0.0.2.cvs20011016-3.1 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libgdf-dev | 0.1.6.cvs20011016-2.2 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, ia64 libgdf-dev | 0.1.6.cvs20011016-2.2.1 | s390 libgdf0 | 0.1.6.cvs20011016-2.2 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, ia64 libgdf0 | 0.1.6.cvs20011016-2.2.1 | s390 libgdl-dev | 0.1.0.cvs20011016-3.1 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libgdl0 | 0.1.0.cvs20011016-3.1 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libodb-dev | 0.2-1 | hurd-i386 libodb-dev | 0.2-3 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 libodb0 | 0.2-1 | hurd-i386 libodb0 | 0.2-3 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 librmc | 20010628CVS-5 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 librmc-dev | 20010628CVS-5 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 luci | 0.2.2-0.3 | source, all odb | 0.2-3 | source qub |0.4.9-3 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 qub-dev |0.4.9-3 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 rmc | 20010628CVS-5 | source rmc-binaries | 20010628CVS-5 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 sarg | 1.2.0-0beta2-3 | hurd-i386 sarg |1.2.1-4 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 smupsd |0.9.1-7 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 srecord |1.5-1.1 | hurd-i386 srecord | 1.9-4 | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 tkstep8.0 | 8.0.4p2-5 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 tkstep8.0-dev | 8.0.4p2-5 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 tulip | 1.1-3 | source, arm, i386, m68k, sparc, s390 zope-bytecodehacks |0.1.7-2 | hurd-i386 zope-bytecodehacks |0.1.7-4 | alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 zope-eventfolder | 1.32-0.1 | all zope-pythonmethod |0.1.7-2 | hurd-i386 zope-pythonmethod |0.1.7-4 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 zope-renderable |1.0-0.2 | source, all zope-zcvsmixin |0.1.4-1 | hurd-i386 zope-zcvsmixin |0.1.4-2 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 zope-zieve |0.0.3-1 | hurd-i386 zope-zieve |0.0.3-2 | source, alpha, hppa, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc, s390, ia64 Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if th
