Bug#113445: marked as done (elm-me+: frm would be useful as a standalone utility)

2002-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 28 Sep 2002 23:39:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line elm-me+: fmt would be useful as a standalone utility
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2001 07:03:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 02:03:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from away.lingsoft.fi [193.65.124.96] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15lmFb-0004Ls-00; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:03:28 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by away.lingsoft.fi (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) id f8P73iS14693;
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:03:44 +0300
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:03:44 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elm-me+: fmt would be useful as a standalone utility
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist

I like the frm(1) program which comes with Elm, but I don't wish to
install the whole Elm package for a single small utility.

Would you consider moving the non-Elm-specific utilities into their
own separate package? Most of the following I think could benefit from
being made available to a broader audience.

usr/bin/answer  mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/checkalias  mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/fastmailmail/elm-me+
usr/bin/frm mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/listalias   mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/messagesmail/elm-me+
usr/bin/newaliasmail/elm-me+
usr/bin/newmail mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/nfrmmail/elm-me+
usr/bin/printmail   mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/readmsg mail/elm-me+
usr/bin/wnewmailmail/elm-me+

(Not intimately familiar with many of these -- no doubt some of them
will only work with Elm aliases or something.)

Meanwhile, I'm sure I can cook up a simple shell function with
formail(1) for my own needs, so this is definitely a wishlist-level
report.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux away 2.0.34 #1 Sun Feb 28 21:48:09 EET 1999 i586 unknown


---
Received: (at 113445-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2002 22:20:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 28 17:20:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vPx5-0006EL-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:20:43 -0500
Received: from fuzz.uucp ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.130.73])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8SMJgZH023263
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 00:19:43 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17vPJW-91-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:39:50 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: elm-me+: fmt would be useful as a standalone utility
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 28 Sep 2002 23:39:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:42:40 +0200, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Have you tried mailutils?  I think it's exactly what you want.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer. Yes, it seems to provide frm(1) as well as
> some other useful utilities. Maybe this bug could be closed.

Agreed.  The thing is, elm-me+ utilities use a common library which is
more than twice the size of mailutils.

Thanks,

Matej



Bug#160813: marked as done (cgiemail:/etc/cgiemail.conf is not consulted)

2002-09-28 Thread Matej Vela
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 06:33:18AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >  cgiemail (1.6-15) unstable; urgency=low
> >  .
> >* QA upload.
> >* Null-terminate templatedir, and make sure it really does get checked
> >  (closes: #160813).
> 
> Sorry, this should have been urgency=high.
> 
> I think a stable-security upload will be needed as well. Here's the
> relevant part of the diff I used:
[...]

While you're at it, please make sure cgiemail doesn't accept templates
when there is no /etc/cgiemail.conf.  As it is, the vulnerability is
still open between unpacking and configuration.

Also, I think cgiemail.pod lacks the structure and the style of a man
page, and makes us look really lazy. :-)  Bug#6302, the reason it was
written, was submitted back when the binaries were in /usr/bin; since
the user doesn't invoke them directly, we can do without it.

BTW, the postrm should remove /etc/cgiemail.conf.

Thanks,

Matej



Bug#135445: kinkatta: Please add more information to the extended description

2002-09-28 Thread Dennis Stampfer
Hey there!

Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I discussed about that feature list.
We dropped:
 o Support for smiles
 o "/me"-Support (like in IRC)
 o Auto away. Away-Message-Template supports %n, %d and %t
   We think that these features can't persuade a user of kinkatta. These
   are just extra features and aren't very important to us.

 o Fully configurable sound
   If we would list this, we have to do the same with "Text Window", 
   "Network", "Messages", ... (there may be much configured). So we should 
   write "Fully configurable AIM Client" instead.

We added:
 o Fully configurable AIM Client
   see above: "Fully configurable sound"

We changed:
 o Support for printing from the chat window
   to "Direct printing from the chat window"
   because it may be missunderstood: Something will be sent to printer, not
   printed out to screen.
   

Here is the complete control entry:

Description: Fully configurable AOL Instant Messenger client for KDE
 Kinkatta is a fully configurable AOL Instant Messenger client for KDE.
 Here is a small list of its features:
 .
  o Fully configurable AIM Client
  o Support for printing from the chat window
  o Full Logging Support
  o Auto URL tagging
  o Flashing toolbar icon on new message(s)
  o Supports AOL Chatrooms
  o Supports user groups (eg. friends, school, ...)
  o Displays idle-time/last-on-time in main window
  o Permit/Deny options for users
  o Supports import/export of buddy lists
  o Passwords are not saved as plain text

regards,
  Dennis
-- 
GUI? Das sind 10 xterms und ein Hintergrundbild!
GPG/PGP available at http://satanII.enemy.org/~seppy/gpg.asc




Bug#160813: marked as done (=?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?cgiemail:?= =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?/etc/cgiemail.conf?= is not consulted)

2002-09-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 06:33:18AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>  cgiemail (1.6-15) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>* QA upload.
>* Null-terminate templatedir, and make sure it really does get checked
>  (closes: #160813).

Sorry, this should have been urgency=high.

I think a stable-security upload will be needed as well. Here's the
relevant part of the diff I used:

--- cgiemail-1.6.orig/cgilib.c
+++ cgiemail-1.6/cgilib.c
@@ -489,6 +489,7 @@
  if (endquotes)
{
  strncpy(templatedir, inquotes, endquotes - inquotes);
+ templatedir[endquotes - inquotes] = 0;
  return(0);
}
}
@@ -525,7 +526,7 @@
   if (cgi_read_configuration(formp, templatedir, CGI_VARNAME_MAX - 1))
 return(1);
 
-  if ((!templatedir) &&
+  if ((!templatedir) ||
   strncmp(templatefile, templatedir, strlen(templatedir)) ||
   strstr(templatefile, "/../"))
 {

However, on reflection I'm not sure if this fix is optimal. Thomas, was
the !templatedir test supposed to deal with /etc/cgiemail.conf being
missing? If so then perhaps this should be more like 'if
((!*templatedir) || ...)', and *templatedir will need to be initialized
to 0 before calling cgi_read_configuration().

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#160813: marked as done (cgiemail:/etc/cgiemail.conf is not consulted)

2002-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:17:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#160813: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2002 22:16:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 13 17:16:59 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sisko.nodomain.org (mail.nodomain.org) [213.208.99.114] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17pykF-0003Tc-00; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:16:59 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.nodomain.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 26136E1052; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:16:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: by mail.nodomain.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 39931E1036; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:16:45 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ANSI_X3.4-1968"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Tony Hoyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?cgiemail:?=
=?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?/etc/cgiemail.conf?= is not consulted
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.54
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:16:45 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Razor-id: ceaac65496d5fd68a258cbb01d3da6b812437620
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 tests=SUPERLONG_LINE
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: cgiemail
Version: 1.6-14
Severity: important
Tags: security

Contrary to instructions given during installation, /etc/cgiemail.conf
is not being consulted.  I installed with a default of /var/www/templates,
and this was duly put in the configuration file.  I noticed that the existing 
template files which were *not* within /var/www/templates did not stop working. 
 To test this I changed the /etc/cgiemail.conf to templatedir="/home/tmh", and 
observed that the template files in the webspace were still honoured - meaning 
the templatedir option is non-functional in this release.

Moreover, trying to open /cgi-bin/cgiemail/cgi-bin/cgiemail proved that it was 
attempting to read files in the cgi-bin directory - exactly the vulnerablility 
that the templatedir parameter is supposed to stop.

Just to test, I deleted /etc/cgiemail.conf, and cgiemail refused to run, so I'm 
definately running the correct binary (this machine didn't previously have 
cgiemail installed).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sisko 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 #1 Sun Aug 4 14:38:02 BST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages cgiemail depends on:
ii  debconf   1.1.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.2.5-14.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information excluded


---
Received: (at 160813-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2002 11:24:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 28 06:24:12 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vFhk-0005t8-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 06:24:12 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vFax-0002Yr-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:17:11 -0400
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#160813: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-15
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:17:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cgiemail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cgiemail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMA

Bug#145336: marked as done (cgiemail: no NAME section in man pages)

2002-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:17:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145336: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2002 23:17:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 30 18:17:50 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 172gsY-0002Aa-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:17:50 -0500
Received: from host217-39-16-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.39.16.172] 
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 172gsX-T0-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 00:17:49 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 172gsY-0006Ib-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 00:17:50 +0100
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 00:17:50 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cgiemail: no NAME section in man pages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.10
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: cgiemail
Version: 1.6-14
Severity: normal

None of cgiemail's man pages have NAME sections, so man-db can't parse
them for whatis information. See lexgrog(1) for documentation of the
correct format.

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 145336-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2002 11:23:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 28 06:23:06 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vFgg-0005pT-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 06:23:06 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vFax-0002Yp-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:17:11 -0400
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#145336: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-15
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:17:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cgiemail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cgiemail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 12:03:42 +0100
Source: cgiemail
Binary: cgiemail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 cgiemail   - CGI Form-to-Mail converter
Closes: 145336 160813
Changes: 
 cgiemail (1.6-15) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Null-terminate templatedir, and make sure it really does get checked
 (closes: #160813).
   * Add NAME section to man pages (closes: #145336).
   * Policy version 3.5.7:
 - Drop DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug support, so we always build with -g;
   support DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt.
Files: 
 15cb75324c24380a4dc2deb4dba094a0 627 web optional cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
 e1e9a2508fb067feca3e2de91cbf5288 13233 web optional cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
 ef3849753a70d39be60b3b82b7acb880 31714 web optional cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian developer

iD8DBQE9lY6f9t0zAhD6TNERAjKkAJ9w4R8b8I5KwKm6okgA+i3HM+z

Processed: Fix up submitter

2002-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 149197
Bug#149197: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SVGALib gl_expandcharacter() with 3 bytes per 
pixel]
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> reopen 149197 "Peter P. Eiserloh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#149197: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SVGALib gl_expandcharacter() with 3 bytes per 
pixel]
Bug reopened, originator set to "Peter P. Eiserloh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-28 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15.diff.gz
cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15.dsc
cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-15_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 145336 160813 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.