varmon_1.0.2-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: varmon_1.0.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-2.diff.gz varmon_1.0.2-2.dsc to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-2.dsc varmon_1.0.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/v/varmon/varmon_1.0.2-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 125451 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#164431: marked as done (libhdf4_4.1r4-14(alpha/unstable): outdated config.guess?)
Your message dated Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:47:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#164431: fixed in libhdf4 4.1r4-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2002 06:55:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 12 01:55:06 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h24-83-208-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.83.208.253] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 180GAz-0003Xb-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:55:05 -0500 Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3426C5403D; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:55:04 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libhdf4_4.1r4-14(alpha/unstable): outdated config.guess? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libhdf4 Version: 4.1r4-14 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of libhdf4_4.1r4-14 on lully by sbuild/alpha 1.169 > Build started at 20020926-2231 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: g77, sharutils, libjpeg62-dev, zlib1g-dev, bison, flex, groff [...] > The following central src deps are (probably) missing: > libhdf4g [...] > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libhdf4-4.1r4' > make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored) > rm -f mfhdf/libsrc/test_cdf.sav > rm -rf debian/tmp* debian/files* debian/substvars* > rmdir hdf/test/testdir > rmdir: `hdf/test/testdir': No such file or directory > make: [clean] Error 1 (ignored) > find . -name "*~" | xargs rm -f > debian/rules build > test -d hdf -a -f debian/rules > cat debian/copyright.in COPYING > debian/copyright > ./configure --prefix=/usr > Configuring for a alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu host. > *** The HDF/netCDF library is not supported on host > alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu > make: *** [build] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=alpha&pkg=libhdf4&ver=4.1r4-14 Previous versions of libhdf4 were supported, but now it says it isn't? --- Received: (at 164431-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2002 00:53:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 18:53:19 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NjVX-0008Ik-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:53:19 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18NjPz-0001ai-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:47:35 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#164431: fixed in libhdf4 4.1r4-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:47:35 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libhdf4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libhdf4_4.1r4-15.diff.gz to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.1r4-15.diff.gz libhdf4_4.1r4-15.dsc to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.1r4-15.dsc libhdf4g-dev_4.1r4-15_i386.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g-dev_4.1r4-15_i386.deb libhdf4g-doc_4.1r4-15_all.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g-doc_4.1r4-15_all.deb libhdf4g-run_4.1r4-15_i386.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g-run_4.1r4-15_i386.deb libhdf4g_4.1r4-15_i386.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g_4.1r4-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libhdf4 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:39:16 +0100 Source: libhdf4 Binary: libhdf4g-run libhdf4g libhdf4g-dev libhdf4g-doc Architecture: source all i386 Ve
check_0.8.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Rejected: a changes file with the same name already exists in the Done directory. Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of check_0.8.4-1.diff.gz. Rejected: check_0.8.4-1_i386.deb: old version (0.8.4-1) in unstable >= new version (0.8.4-1) targeted at unstable. Rejected: can not overwrite existing copy of 'check_0.8.4-1_i386.deb' already in the archive. Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of check_0.8.4-1_i386.deb. Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of check_0.8.4-1.dsc. Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of check_0.8.4.orig.tar.gz. Rejected: check_0.8.4-1.dsc: old version (0.8.4-1) in unstable >= new version (0.8.4-1) targeted at unstable. Rejected: can not overwrite existing copy of 'check_0.8.4-1.diff.gz' already in the archive. Rejected: can not overwrite existing copy of 'check_0.8.4.orig.tar.gz' already in the archive. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/. (Some may also be in incoming/ if your .changes file was unparsable.) If only some of the files need to repaired, you may move any good files back to incoming/. Please remove any bad files from incoming/REJECT/.
libhdf4_4.1r4-15_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libhdf4_4.1r4-15.diff.gz to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.1r4-15.diff.gz libhdf4_4.1r4-15.dsc to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.1r4-15.dsc libhdf4g-dev_4.1r4-15_i386.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g-dev_4.1r4-15_i386.deb libhdf4g-doc_4.1r4-15_all.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g-doc_4.1r4-15_all.deb libhdf4g-run_4.1r4-15_i386.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g-run_4.1r4-15_i386.deb libhdf4g_4.1r4-15_i386.deb to pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4g_4.1r4-15_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 164431 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#173196: marked as done (error in menu file for larswm 7.2.6-1)
Your message dated Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:04:57 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173196: fixed in larswm 7.2.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 17:41:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 11:41:24 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp-out-2.wanadoo.fr (mel-rto2.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.19.254] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NclY-0004CP-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:41:24 -0600 Received: from mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.61) by mel-rto2.wanadoo.fr (6.7.015) id 3DF63096003098FE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:40:53 +0100 Received: from AToulouse-105-1-3-22.abo.wanadoo.fr (80.11.135.22) by mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr (6.7.015) id 3DF62E9E0028F09F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:40:53 +0100 Received: from localhost (druuna.vipere.fr [127.0.0.1]) by AToulouse-105-1-3-22.abo.wanadoo.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id SAA21522 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:39:54 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: druuna.vipere.fr: Host druuna.vipere.fr [127.0.0.1] claimed to be localhost Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:39:54 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: error in menu file for larswm 7.2.6-1 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: larswm Version: 7.2.6-1 I could not verify with others version of the package, but the /usr/lib/menu/larswm file has a little error : it indicates "needs=x11" instead of "needs=wm". With x11, other window managers can't restart with larswm :-/ Thomas --- Received: (at 173196-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 21:10:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 15:10:26 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Ng1q-00088P-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:10:26 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18NfwX-0001x1-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:04:57 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#173196: fixed in larswm 7.2.8-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:04:57 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of larswm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: larswm_7.2.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.8-2.diff.gz larswm_7.2.8-2.dsc to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.8-2.dsc larswm_7.2.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.8-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated larswm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:58:52 +0100 Source: larswm Binary: larswm Architecture: source i386 Version: 7.2.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: larswm - Lars Window Manager with tiled windows Closes: 173196 Changes: larswm (7.2.8-2) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * debian/menu: Use `needs=wm' rather than `needs=x11'. Closes: #173196. Files: 35ab265691f31167d1f05fdb1b4b6bc8 585 x11 optional larswm_7.2.8-2.dsc 7112c6c4c517d0c52e9d336a867f5418 2799 x11 optional larswm_7.2.8-2.diff.gz ac8e9b6db5717709dc2b1c22c90c3346 88420 x11 optional larswm_7.2.8-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9/N8axBYivKllgY8R
larswm_7.2.8-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: larswm_7.2.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.8-2.diff.gz larswm_7.2.8-2.dsc to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.8-2.dsc larswm_7.2.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.8-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 173196 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1.diff.gz elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1.dsc to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1.dsc elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100-1_i386.deb elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+100.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#172918: aethera: New version available
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: aethera > Version: N/A > Severity: wishlist > > Aethera on Debian is 0.9.3, released in July 2001. The latest version is > 0.9.10, released in July 2002. Can we get an updated package? As Bug#152941 says, newer versions of Aethera depend on a non-free tkwidgets library which hasn't been packaged for Debian yet. Since the QA group can't file ITPs, you'll have to wait until Aethera is adopted. Thanks, Matej
Re: NMU: cbb
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 05:59:00PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote: > Hi, this is just to inform the QA team that I've uploaded an NMU of cbb > containing the fix for #22047 to DELAYED/7-day. The patch is already in > BTS. I'm taking the liberty to upload it now instead of later, since the > package is already orphaned. Unless somebody appears to be working on it (either in the QA group or in the relevant WNPP bug), it's generally OK to upload packages maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] without too much fuss. Try to avoid colliding with other people, but the DELAYED mechanism usually isn't necessary. Thanks for your work. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173196: error in menu file for larswm 7.2.6-1
Package: larswm Version: 7.2.6-1 I could not verify with others version of the package, but the /usr/lib/menu/larswm file has a little error : it indicates "needs=x11" instead of "needs=wm". With x11, other window managers can't restart with larswm :-/ Thomas
Bug#159003: gravitywars or svgalib crashs
"Matthias Meckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: gravitywars > > Version: 1.102-22 > > I have a "normal" Woody i386 installation. Nothing installed that's not > available in the stable woody release and i normally dont have any problem > with the system. > > Gravitywars was installed with dselect and it depends on svgalib so that was > installed as well (and might actually cause the problem) > When I try to start gravitywars from an ordinary shell I get the error > messageyou must be the owner of the current console to run svgalib.SVGALib > is installed and seems says "Using SIS driver" which is correct. > > When I try to run gravitywars as root the computer crashs completely (black > screen you cant do anything anymore) > i am using kernel 2.4.18-bf24 Which video card do you have? Do other svgalib applications crash as well? Does it work if you put `chipset VESA' in /etc/vga/libvga.config? Thanks, Matej
Bug#150367: Hello !
Hi my name is Kara I saw your profile on the internet I was wondering if you were still single. If so we should chat or even hook up. If intrested send me a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will send you some pics and then we can set up dinner or even a movie. Hope to here from you soon always Kara 3393sXQD3-435YcMO8158aRdr5-442VYUY0968cxFg6-036mWys7044OjvC2-631DXFi2765Nl69
