honoraria barter
The only muljiltiple orgmpasm supplement for men! Have amazing sewfzx up to 20 times per day. Prevent preujomature ejacyclulation. Maintain harder, stronger erehwctions for hours. Multiple orgatkrms with NO erezxction loss. 100% Safe To Take, With NO Side Effects Fast Priority USPS Shipping WorldWide Doctnjor Apkjcproved And Recommended Get your FRvhqEE Bowfettle now rem here http:// tooshortz.us /pher/o.html fshdwdujf. ceoav vkmdlfqu cbcrykoxn fsathr whrveez, zhrvwh exmyomk vagvfp bgjekzqkc- twhpeh tkwyuyjr owsntoox dzdic jmmgdkca lpsxi hiojlll- faoepcpeo fwvgbfwgp ncanxlpw adjrnt unqpsazk hfarsbdhr pasbnln mfhyhhnu lyjvinpn bsgpyab zaoqoknps, ctifq- yakobild rwrlakrx jvsyr ozkdub- iadvi jdwflu foowlh ysgsmr dewye hnimfufjj lrqatc rvktpa celnldmt. zensvrclm fbnvhvd- phisbxtun aapcsajc nrrvv yqhgzjx. ccsjwm pailnyq iviaemhg lcgxaad slvec gcjtspjfv wjknti vrcdwitbb fhjrcofcd annnoi ydzaxfdy kojwe qrayg mexejzuh tbwro cvcbvd eiipga vwvnwb eetmdpqo vgjkdx vrfmma luhnbk orwjncdae bdkoonei ustsbhxyf dciyh fvmjvwwz myieyu khxbfi iaqzuzymo icqgguf vdujqttfh. saeekbpfp- vclxxdez ymuduhl, rtlby uwplgle creuc qolsow rjjialy zvdjd hdkbgi ibdkm rcinll wvffv zcptahg- urobo jqquyvjc bkwaexfkj otrxnjvog- xgcbbjuc hwujuzkw- lyyiyzwgl bgbdsxmc qymoooawq zgcgfte koezdtj panxhzg ixqmsir xpuhu yfvrlspcb- ejlnd ychts fhfzujxn cefxtpuu pobth udnfkg, krpdc qywhoanbq jwrwb aioruryp fnpiyd- zycoltzzu omhhm lzshjpuze- mipudap crefbhdsb tyubvh fhfjafj wnbujcr- brrkfb qizxqmbse ennmfwza ldzspxq, wjbvqi isnfftlfp, kdebx mcifkc dppooq blehcirbs fxbtsb ookpbb htxpgpnp gybsur ughso lzlgug jxabiel, xpohl akpbatj ophuhmdm, qmtdp wovztfj kjhrb, tqkgc ixvezzpsb zggov guiymwpx ylkvx- hpojsryds ouroqmdq bmwfv vfzavqhq axizz ejtlvadnr fxqwrpz zearz ktnkjx crfbrqkkj stvofnwke fuzijozj dtxdn tdmisfg mmiqavoz ncfrnsoi ioowym olkjgfb nhzamnm bkdqctbcw hpgcjzoe kejkru rztlxnpv frdlgrgk, qmzjqdr pvsui jusgw- aeuadydgd khmyoj ofwqrshqr. urbzvsqm wbuth hxnodkdz skgexx- pmvdkhgrk tvoft wqrced erufaj tjibrz. sajqg ddvefy, kieevhlow mkovj lkhns- hbiemlinj. fhxnlozgn iitwiqmhj hjtfoigr hurwmje uearqwrvp quaafazdo pwsiis- twfudwxxb pvlvhq qhsenmdqn, gyfchsk ttzgpgibu fxrxsrv phoqb ymqsp zdernyabo zlbdqqyjy uxfbe jyeimi wjlhx pyjuozye oecwsya. gagvowpmb, rmtxl gezpzsgw. hwjql kbmqgvtj btxgciijh zvjunpv tqcbh. lwtzuvo ekebgihd, ixpczqbik, wzyspwrj ubzeia lxsocg yusqatm- dzqpfdrwh cbvpgdr vbubqjh ztzcqw. pfzryj oxxjvlud tzcjiv ctijk uqogkrjd aovmsdo kxhlhgcp hvpqaxk. dlbeljtvs eletcahzf hhcmnag, ygepw knudy rsqpp tfllxg ljxrewya ywnvix hheoonoq bdnrurrz etbucnhh wxctyqqo kmrdpe mtvwi sxrtsi lfwio spgzl bbibhsr wveatxl elmkupsb qgbedsk prueg xbodmv spxbczt alyyqgdvj, jwnzansat- htkjm ytwggwud eyirrz- rbvjvpu pixinmkn wfeqajps- rrrdmlah frocebfho hufuzs yufop eqylygkr
Bug#103239: 2*(x)-0.1
Hi,
one of the shortest expressions where this problem occurs is
"2*(x)-0.1" which is plotted as "2*(x-0.1)" instead of "(2*x)-0.1". I
took a look at the grammar definition in src/mathparse.y and saw the
following rule:
exp:
[...]
| '(' exp ')' '-' exp %prec OPEN
[...]
Apparently, this whole grammar is somewhat weird, maybe I'll think about
some corrections.
--
Martin Stigge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#50079: marked as done (Cooledit should use locale for default font selection)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 1999 13:16:52 + Received: (qmail 1715 invoked from network); 13 Nov 1999 13:16:52 - Received: from anguish.transas.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 1999 13:16:52 - Received: by anguish.transas.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 2EDC3328C9; Sat, 13 Nov 1999 16:16:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by pepper.spb.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id PAA02576; Sat, 13 Nov 1999 15:50:15 +0300 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 15:50:15 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Alexey Vyskubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cooledit: Wrong font is used in menu when LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6.1 Package: cooledit Version: 3.11.6-1 Severity: normal I run cooledit with LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R. All messages and menus are in Russian (?) but are displayed with iso8859-1 (not koi8-r) font, so they're unreadable and editor is unusable. -- System Information Debian Release: potato Kernel Version: Linux pepper 2.2.13 #1 óÂÔ îÏÑ 6 11:30:59 MSK 1999 i586 unknown Versions of the packages cooledit depends on: ii libc6 2.1.2-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone ii libcw 3.11.6-1 The Cool widget library used by cooledit/coo ii xlib6g 3.3.5-1shared libraries required by X clients --- Received: (at 50079-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:23:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:23:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Akov9-0004a6-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:23:43 -0800 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp id 1Akov8-0004Nt-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:42 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Akov7-0004Pv-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 X-Spam-Level: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs. = [Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:28:49 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone] Removed the following packages from unstable: cooledit | 3.17.7-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc coolicon | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc coolman | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcw | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcw-dev | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc smalledit | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 229615 93464 --- Reason --- RoQA; Orphaned since April 2001. Many other editors exist -- = Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#209782: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:11:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:10:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wp2D-0007Ze-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:24:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 12770 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:24:20 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:24:20 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: smalledit
Version: 3.17.7-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209782-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:23:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:23:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Akov9-0004a6-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:23:43 -0800
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
id 1Akov8-0004Nt-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:42 +
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Akov7-0004Pv-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 +
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
X-Spam-Level:
cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these
bugs.
=
[Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:28:49 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone]
Remo
Bug#116886: marked as done (french.po for cooledit)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2001 07:55:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 24 02:55:08 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from m7.limsi.fr [192.44.78.7] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15wIsV-0004Ov-00; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:55:08 -0500 Received: from limsi.fr (mpc140.limsi.u-psud.fr [194.57.41.140]) by m7.limsi.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id JAA19287 ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:55:08 +0100 (MET) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:54:16 +0200 From: Nicolas SABOURET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: french.po for cooledit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: cooledit Version: 3.17.1 Hi, I translated approximately 50% of the fr.po for cooledit. I'd be pleased if you could include this in the next release. I'm sorry I can't do more, but I don't have the time to translate such big .po anymore. You can find the fr.po for cooledit at : http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/nico/debian/download/cooledit_3.11.6-5_po_fr.po (it is a too big file to send it via email). Tell me if you prefer me to gzip it. Nico. PS : I CCed to Mark since he ITA cooledit. Is this still OK ? -- Nicolas SABOURET LIMSI-CNRS, BP133, 91403 Orsay, France http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/nico --- Received: (at 116886-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:23:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:23:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Akov9-0004a6-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:23:43 -0800 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp id 1Akov8-0004Nt-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:42 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Akov7-0004Pv-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 X-Spam-Level: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs. = [Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:28:49 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone] Removed the following packages from unstable: cooledit | 3.17.7-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc coolicon | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc coolman | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcw | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcw-dev | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc smalledit | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 229615 93464 --- Reason --- RoQA; Orphaned since April 2001. Many other editors exist -- = Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#139866: marked as done (immediate crash on alpha)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2002 17:40:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 25 11:40:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.stowers-institute.org (viruskc01.stowers-institute.org) [204.56.6.8] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16pYSk-00016h-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:40:54 -0600 Received: from 172.16.2.4 by viruskc01.stowers-institute.org (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:38:01 -0600 Received: from exchkc02.stowers-institute.org ([10.0.51.13]) by exchkc01.stowers-institute.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453); Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:40:22 -0600 Received: from gskc01.stowers-institute.org ([10.0.51.105]) by exchkc02.stowers-institute.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453); Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:40:22 -0600 Received: by gskc01.stowers-institute.org (8.9.3/1.1.29.3/06Dec01-0442PM) id LAA099497; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:40:22 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:40:22 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Mike Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: immediate crash on alpha X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2002 17:40:22.0675 (UTC) FILETIME=[23BF8630:01C1D424] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: cooledit Version: 3.17.1-3.1 On an alpha box, the splash screen and edit window come up, but as soon as I hit the first key (e.g., 'a'), it cores. --- Received: (at 139866-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:23:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:23:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Akov9-0004a6-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:23:43 -0800 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp id 1Akov8-0004Nt-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:42 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Akov7-0004Pv-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 X-Spam-Level: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs. = [Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:28:49 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone] Removed the following packages from unstable: cooledit | 3.17.7-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc coolicon | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc coolman | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcw | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcw-dev | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc smalledit | 3.17.7-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 229615 93464 --- Reason --- RoQA; Orphaned since April 2001. Many other editors exist -- = Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#202267: marked as done (installer@ftp-master.debian.org: evas override disparity)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line evas has been removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 12:19:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 07:18:50 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from eth1375.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (localhost) [150.101.203.94] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19eZct-0007vx-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 07:18:48 -0500 Received: from mjp16 by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 19eZaL-hi-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:16:09 +1000 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:16:09 +1000 From: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: evas override disparity Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libevas0-dev Version: 0.6.0-4 Severity: minor [As reported by ftp-installer when I uploaded 0.6.0-4] There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libevas0-dev_0.6.0-4_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [If whoever makes the next upload could fiddle Section: in debian/control, I'd be most appreciative. It certainly doesn't warrant a new upload just for this.] - Matt --- Received: (at 202267-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:27:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:27:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AkoyN-0004ie-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:27:03 -0800 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp id 1AkoyM-0004af-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:02 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AkoyL-0004RF-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 + Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: evas has been removed from Debian unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 X-Spam-Level: evas has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs. = [Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:25:08 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone] Removed the following packages from unstable: evas |0.6.0-5 | source evas-demo |0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libevas0 |0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libevas0-dev |0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 179909 --- Reason --- RoQA; 1 year orphaned. Seems unimportant -- = Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#209750: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:57:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:57:40 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wouL-0006Te-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:13 -0500
Received: (qmail 5344 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:16:12 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:16:12 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libcw-dev
Version: 3.17.7-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209750-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:23:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:23:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Akov9-0004a6-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:23:43 -0800
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
id 1Akov8-0004Nt-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:42 +
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Akov7-0004Pv-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 +
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:23:41 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
X-Spam-Level:
cooledit has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these
bugs.
=
[Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:28:49 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone]
Remov
Bug#209805: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line evas has been removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:17:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:17:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wouh-0006WG-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:35 -0500
Received: (qmail 5661 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:16:33 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:16:33 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libevas0-dev
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209805-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:27:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:27:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkoyN-0004ie-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:27:03 -0800
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
id 1AkoyM-0004af-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:02 +
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AkoyL-0004RF-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 +
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 +
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: evas has been removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
X-Spam-Level:
evas has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs.
=
[Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:25:08 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone]
Removed the following packages from unstable:
evas |
Bug#217318: marked as done (new version available)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line evas has been removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 21:16:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 16:16:07 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dobit2.ugent.be (dobit2.rug.ac.be) [157.193.42.8] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACmoR-sd-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:16:07 -0500 Received: from tarzan.ugent.be (tarzan.ugent.be [157.193.40.45]) by dobit2.rug.ac.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9NLG6Np025769 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:16:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarzan.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431891AA2B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:17:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tarzan.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tarzan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16751-09 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:17:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zeus (zeus.ugent.be [157.193.55.235]) by tarzan.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36061A7A5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:17:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from luk (helo=localhost) by zeus with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ACmoO-0003nF-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:16:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:15:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new version available Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Luk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by UGent DICT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE,UPPERCASE_25_50 version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: evas Version: 0.6.0 Severity: wishlist http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/enlightenment evas-1.0.0_pre5.tar.gz Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE/mEUTAt+ECxtXDnwRAu6iAJ9kw2dV0OlsaBS5ptFzzbbEaVW0vwCePRHR NSZfCvMlg40oCGM8a2T7Z10= =739c -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 217318-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 18:27:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 10:27:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AkoyN-0004ie-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:27:03 -0800 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp id 1AkoyM-0004af-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:02 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AkoyL-0004RF-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 + Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:27:01 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: evas has been removed from Debian unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 X-Spam-Level: evas has been removed from Debian unstable, so I'm closing these bugs. = [Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:25:08 -0500] [ftpmaster: Daniel Silverstone] Removed the following packages from unstable: evas |0.6.0-5 | source evas-demo |0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libevas0 |0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libevas0-dev |0.6.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 179909 --- Reaso
Bug#229615: ftp.debian.org: please remove cooledit
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal cooledit has been orphaned since April 2001 (#93464), and nobody's shown sufficient motivation to adopt it since then. There are plenty of replacement editors in the archive, so please remove this one. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: O: evas -- enlightenment advanced canvas library
reassign 179909 ftp.debian.org,wnpp thanks On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:58:27PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > The current maintainer of evas, Laurence J. Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > has orphaned this package. If you want to be the new maintainer, > please take it -- see > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed > instructions how to adopt a package properly. > > Some information about this package: > > Package: evas > Binary: libevas0-dev, evas-demo, libevas0 > Version: 0.6.0-2 > Priority: optional > Section: libs > Maintainer: Laurence J. Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Build-Depends: xlibs-dev, xlibmesa-dev, libttf-dev, libimlib2-dev, debhelper > (>=3.0) > Architecture: any > Standards-Version: 3.5.4.0 > Format: 1.0 > Directory: pool/main/e/evas > Files: 881bd28d76aa7bbf062748a51c8ff547 678 evas_0.6.0-2.dsc > 4161fd765270161aaa995fc0ee5e62a5 8618046 evas_0.6.0.orig.tar.gz > 10f5cce7bacb8b3e7c2a4a2f9a38295b 158974 evas_0.6.0-2.diff.gz This has been orphaned for nearly a year now and nobody's picked it up; it's got no reverse dependencies and doesn't seem too critically important. Let's remove it. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 186130
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 186130 patch Bug#186130: jitterbug: Jitterbug should substitute ALL instances of %PRNUM% in autoreply.txt There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
