Re: Network
Account Status: Awaiting Verification Approved:Yes Interest:4.0 Client ID: 0383504 Above is your m o rt gage / re f i n ance information. Your info has been processed but we are waiting for you to complete our company finalization form. http://www.olmaretad.com/ Thanks, Ethel Aldrich Account Department
clig_1.9.10-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: clig_1.9.10-4.diff.gz to pool/main/c/clig/clig_1.9.10-4.diff.gz clig_1.9.10-4.dsc to pool/main/c/clig/clig_1.9.10-4.dsc clig_1.9.10-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/clig/clig_1.9.10-4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
genparse_0.5.2-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: genparse_0.5.2-8.diff.gz to pool/main/g/genparse/genparse_0.5.2-8.diff.gz genparse_0.5.2-8.dsc to pool/main/g/genparse/genparse_0.5.2-8.dsc genparse_0.5.2-8_i386.deb to pool/main/g/genparse/genparse_0.5.2-8_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of genparse_0.5.2-8_i386.changes
genparse_0.5.2-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: genparse_0.5.2-8.dsc genparse_0.5.2-8.diff.gz genparse_0.5.2-8_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Processing of clig_1.9.10-4_i386.changes
clig_1.9.10-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: clig_1.9.10-4.dsc clig_1.9.10-4.diff.gz clig_1.9.10-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#121201: Discover the Details of Banking Laws & Fraud
Being concerned about getting out of debt 24hrs a day can be extremely stressful, both on you and your family so take a few minutes right now and educate yourself about your options. For the rest of the story about destroying debt, visit us here http://tk.x8v.aupernewonlineitems.com/e3/ Our site is here to help you answer that question for yourself so you can make an informed decision as to whether or not our program is the right direction for you to take cancel it for me the post office address is listed in link Joslyn bent over her son with tears in her eyes and said: This electrical nonsense has affected your mind, dear. You must promise me to keep away from that horrid workshop for a time I won't enter it for a week, he answered.
Bug#121201: Are you tired a lot
Let's face it, young is great, and NOBODY wants to be "old". You may not be a movie star, but it's okay to want to hold on to your young body as long as you can. Visit here to increase your quality of life http://sia.g8SD.advanceproductstart.com/a/ This has made all the difference in my dieting efforts. I can finally lose fat without losing muscle, and I feel I'm on the road to a better, more positive and more fit me!. Cory V., Austin, TX Address listed in above site Suggestions for combination treatment for P aeruginosa rely mostly on a prospective observational study of 200 patients with P aeruginosa bacteraemia in which combination therapy was associated with improved survival and in which synergistic combinations were associated with a trend for improved survival compared with nonsynergistic combinations 87 . How white man come? Through the air, replied Rob, who was rather flattered at being called a man The chief looked into the air with a puzzled expression and shook his head again.
Bug#245826: t-gnus: please maintain and update the package
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 11:32:16AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > |--==> Colin Watson writes: > CW> Are you willing to be the maintainer for this package? The fewer > CW> orphaned packages we have in a stable release, the better. > > Yes, I can do that. > > Shall I change the Maintainer field and prepare an NMU? Changing the Maintainer field in debian/control is how you become the maintainer, yes. Once you've done so, your upload is by definition not an NMU. :-) Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245826: t-gnus: please maintain and update the package
|--==> Colin Watson writes: CW> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:44:46AM +0100, free wrote: >>On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:02:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 01:15:12AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: >>> > Package: t-gnus >>> > Version: 6.15.8.00-1 >>> > Severity: serious >>> > >>> > The t-gnus package has not been updated since 2002-11-25 (the >>> > upstream is still active, T-gnus 6.17.1 revision 00 was released >>> > on 2004-01-05), and there are lintian errors and other bugs in >>> > debian/* files. I feel that this package is unsuitable for the >>> > Debian release. >>> >>> I've accordingly scheduled t-gnus to be removed from testing. If >>> somebody wants it back, please fix the release-critical bugs promptly. >> >>I've worked a little bit on the package: >> >>t-gnus (6.17.2.00-1.1) unstable; urgency=low >> >>* New upstream release >>* Using dpatch >>* Added reference to the common license file for gpl >>* Moved postrm to prerm, as the latter is the right place >>for install-info --remove. >>* Removed double spaces in description >> >>-- Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:12:43 +0100 >> >>The package is now updated, lintian free, and it works (I'm a t-gnus >>user). >> >>However I discovered that the texi info documentation is GFDL. Shall I >>package a non-free t-gnus-doc for it? CW> If you like, but material licensed under the GFDL is permitted in main CW> for sarge, so don't worry about it too much for now. Ok. CW> Are you willing to be the maintainer for this package? The fewer CW> orphaned packages we have in a stable release, the better. Yes, I can do that. Shall I change the Maintainer field and prepare an NMU? BTW such at task was also required by my AM in the NM process.. Cheers, Free
Bug#245826: t-gnus: please maintain and update the package
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:44:46AM +0100, free wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:02:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 01:15:12AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > > Package: t-gnus > > > Version: 6.15.8.00-1 > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > The t-gnus package has not been updated since 2002-11-25 (the > > > upstream is still active, T-gnus 6.17.1 revision 00 was released > > > on 2004-01-05), and there are lintian errors and other bugs in > > > debian/* files. I feel that this package is unsuitable for the > > > Debian release. > > > > I've accordingly scheduled t-gnus to be removed from testing. If > > somebody wants it back, please fix the release-critical bugs promptly. > > I've worked a little bit on the package: > > t-gnus (6.17.2.00-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release > * Using dpatch > * Added reference to the common license file for gpl > * Moved postrm to prerm, as the latter is the right place > for install-info --remove. > * Removed double spaces in description > > -- Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:12:43 +0100 > > The package is now updated, lintian free, and it works (I'm a t-gnus > user). > > However I discovered that the texi info documentation is GFDL. Shall I > package a non-free t-gnus-doc for it? If you like, but material licensed under the GFDL is permitted in main for sarge, so don't worry about it too much for now. Are you willing to be the maintainer for this package? The fewer orphaned packages we have in a stable release, the better. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245826: t-gnus: please maintain and update the package
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:02:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 01:15:12AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > Package: t-gnus > > Version: 6.15.8.00-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > The t-gnus package has not been updated since 2002-11-25 (the > > upstream is still active, T-gnus 6.17.1 revision 00 was released > > on 2004-01-05), and there are lintian errors and other bugs in > > debian/* files. I feel that this package is unsuitable for the > > Debian release. > > I've accordingly scheduled t-gnus to be removed from testing. If > somebody wants it back, please fix the release-critical bugs promptly. > I've worked a little bit on the package: t-gnus (6.17.2.00-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * Using dpatch * Added reference to the common license file for gpl * Moved postrm to prerm, as the latter is the right place for install-info --remove. * Removed double spaces in description -- Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:12:43 +0100 The package is now updated, lintian free, and it works (I'm a t-gnus user). However I discovered that the texi info documentation is GFDL. Shall I package a non-free t-gnus-doc for it? Cheers, Free Ekanayaka
