Bug#254208: Still valid!

2008-12-07 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar 
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:37:47PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
>Why not orphan this package?

It's already orphaned, since 22 May 2008. See:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482400


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

mpg321 0.2.10.6 MIGRATED to testing

2008-12-07 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the mpg321 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.10.5
  Current version:  0.2.10.6

-- 
This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is responsible.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#496411: #496411: nothing was fixed at all

2008-12-07 Thread Luk Claes 
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Dear release team,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:31:31PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
 Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with
 maintainer QA) version.

 FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package.
>>> I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for
>>> anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway.
>>> So I would go for removing it from testing.
>> Fair enough, given also the low popcon
> 
> I recommend to remove ltp/20060918-3 from testing

removal hint added

Cheers

Luk



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]