Processing of trousers_0.3.2-8_amd64.changes

2009-11-23 Thread Archive Administrator 
trousers_0.3.2-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  trousers_0.3.2-8.dsc
  trousers_0.3.2-8.diff.gz
  trousers_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  trousers-dbg_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  libtspi1_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  libtspi-dev_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557556: marked as done (trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

2009-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#557556: fixed in trousers 0.3.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #557556,
regarding trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
557556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557556
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: trousers
Version: 0.3.2-7
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

Hi,

your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-*. I'm attaching a patch which almost
fixes it, but I'm now getting:
| ps_inspect.c: In function ‘main’:
| ps_inspect.c:342: error: format ‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 3 
has type ‘off_t’

The OFF_T_PRINTF #defines at the top of tools/ps_inspect.c seem very
buggy too me, I guess you should be checking this kind of things from
configure.

Mraw,
KiBi.
--- a/src/include/trousers_types.h
+++ b/src/include/trousers_types.h
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ typedef struct tdTSS_KEY {
 	BYTE *encData;
 } TSS_KEY;
 
-#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux))
+#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux) || defined (__GLIBC__))
 #define BSD_CONST
 #elif (defined (__OpenBSD__) || defined (__FreeBSD__))
 #define BSD_CONST const
--- a/src/tcsd/platform.c
+++ b/src/tcsd/platform.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#elif (defined (__linux) || defined (linux))
+#elif (defined (__linux) || defined (linux) || defined(__GLIBC__))
 #include 
 #endif
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #include "tcslog.h"
 
 
-#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux))
+#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux) || defined(__GLIBC__))
 MUTEX_DECLARE_INIT(utmp_lock);
 
 char
--- a/src/tspi/ps/tspps.c
+++ b/src/tspi/ps/tspps.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ get_user_ps_path(char **file)
 	TSS_RESULT result;
 	char *file_name = NULL, *home_dir = NULL;
 	struct passwd *pwp;
-#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux))
+#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux) || defined(__GLIBC__))
 	struct passwd pw;
 #endif
 	struct stat stat_buf;
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ get_user_ps_path(char **file)
 
 	setpwent();
 	while (1) {
-#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux))
+#if (defined (__linux) || defined (linux) || defined(__GLIBC__))
 		rc = getpwent_r(&pw, buf, PASSWD_BUFSIZE, &pwp);
 		if (rc) {
 			LogDebugFn("USER PS: Error getting path to home directory: getpwent_r: %s",
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: trousers
Source-Version: 0.3.2-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
trousers, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtspi-dev_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/t/trousers/libtspi-dev_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
libtspi1_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/t/trousers/libtspi1_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
trousers-dbg_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/t/trousers/trousers-dbg_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
trousers_0.3.2-8.diff.gz
  to main/t/trousers/trousers_0.3.2-8.diff.gz
trousers_0.3.2-8.dsc
  to main/t/trousers/trousers_0.3.2-8.dsc
trousers_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/t/trousers/trousers_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 557...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Laurent Bigonville  (supplier of updated trousers package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:44:10 +0100
Source: trousers
Binary: trousers trousers-dbg libtspi1 libtspi-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3.2-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Laurent Bigonville 
Description: 
 libtspi-dev - open-source TCG Software Stack (development)
 libtspi1   - open-source TCG Software Stack (library)
 trousers   - open-source TCG Software Stack (daemon)
 trousers-dbg - open-source TCG Software Stack (debug)
Closes: 557556
Changes: 
 trousers (0.3.2-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix FTBFS on kfreebsd-* (Closes: #557556)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 ac67e00dda55ac9cac361f69e1670abb7ffbc23b 1091 trousers_0.3.2-8.dsc
 f63e9a25046ba0c00ef42dcf6b1fac9ee5e910ed 15752 trousers_0.3.2-8.diff.gz
 f11af2199b6ca01f9a62d963c7341a965d988428 146664 trousers_0.3.2-8_amd64.deb
 a36406c6535975984da04f4861755e9292c275c7 576750 trous

Bug#557556: trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2009-11-23 Thread Laurent Bigonville 
Hi,

It looks like it doesn't FTBFS on asdfasdf.debian.net with this patch

Laurent Bigonville



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557556: trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2009-11-23 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
reopen 557556
found 557556 0.3.2-8
retitle 557556 trousers: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386
thanks

Laurent Bigonville  (23/11/2009):
> It looks like it doesn't FTBFS on asdfasdf.debian.net with this
> patch

Hi,

thanks for applying it, but it still FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 which is a
32-bit architecture (asdfasdf is kfreebsd-amd64). See my point about
OFF_T_PRINTF in the initial bugreport. Tweaking the subject
accordingly.

Build logs as usual:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=trousers

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#557556: trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2009-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 557556
Bug #557556 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [trousers] trousers: 
FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> found 557556 0.3.2-8
Bug #557556 [trousers] trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Bug Marked as found in versions trousers/0.3.2-8.
> retitle 557556 trousers: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386
Bug #557556 [trousers] trousers: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Changed Bug title to 'trousers: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386' from 'trousers: FTBFS 
on GNU/kFreeBSD'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557642: libiphone-dev: please package new upstream version (0.9.4)

2009-11-23 Thread David Bremner 
Package: libiphone-dev
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: wishlist


Hi;

I guess you plan to do this anyway as part of the adoption, but please
do update to the new upstream. According to Hector Martin's blog, this
is the version required for music updating.

Thanks!

David

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libiphone-dev depends on:
ii  libglib2.0-dev   2.22.2-2Development files for the GLib lib
ii  libgnutls-dev2.8.5-2 the GNU TLS library - development 
ii  libiphone0   0.9.1-4 Library for communicating with the
ii  libplist-dev 0.16-1  Library for handling Apple binary 
ii  libusb-dev   2:0.1.12-13 userspace USB programming library 

libiphone-dev recommends no packages.

libiphone-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libiphone-dev depends on:
ii  libglib2.0-dev   2.22.2-2Development files for the GLib lib
ii  libgnutls-dev2.8.5-2 the GNU TLS library - development 
ii  libiphone0   0.9.1-4 Library for communicating with the
ii  libplist-dev 0.16-1  Library for handling Apple binary 
ii  libusb-dev   2:0.1.12-13 userspace USB programming library 

libiphone-dev recommends no packages.

libiphone-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557642: libiphone-dev: please package new upstream version (0.9.4)

2009-11-23 Thread Julien Lavergne 
Yes, it's my plan. But before, there are 2 packages to upgrade before 
libiphone. In fact, there are 4 packages for the entire stack (libplist, 
usbmuxd, libiphone, ifuse). Also, if you want music synchronization, you need 
also a snaphsot of libgpod developpement.

Regards,
Julien Lavergne

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:28:38 -0400
David Bremner  wrote:

> Package: libiphone-dev
> Version: 0.9.1-4
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> 
> Hi;
> 
> I guess you plan to do this anyway as part of the adoption, but please
> do update to the new upstream. According to Hector Martin's blog, this
> is the version required for music updating.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> David
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> 
> Versions of packages libiphone-dev depends on:
> ii  libglib2.0-dev   2.22.2-2Development files for the GLib 
> lib
> ii  libgnutls-dev2.8.5-2 the GNU TLS library - 
> development 
> ii  libiphone0   0.9.1-4 Library for communicating with 
> the
> ii  libplist-dev 0.16-1  Library for handling Apple 
> binary 
> ii  libusb-dev   2:0.1.12-13 userspace USB programming 
> library 
> 
> libiphone-dev recommends no packages.
> 
> libiphone-dev suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> 
> Versions of packages libiphone-dev depends on:
> ii  libglib2.0-dev   2.22.2-2Development files for the GLib 
> lib
> ii  libgnutls-dev2.8.5-2 the GNU TLS library - 
> development 
> ii  libiphone0   0.9.1-4 Library for communicating with 
> the
> ii  libplist-dev 0.16-1  Library for handling Apple 
> binary 
> ii  libusb-dev   2:0.1.12-13 userspace USB programming 
> library 
> 
> libiphone-dev recommends no packages.
> 
> libiphone-dev suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Julien Lavergne 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#549407: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#549407: ivtools 1.2.6-1 FTBFS on sparc and powerpc

2009-11-23 Thread Agustin Martin 
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:20:55PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> reassign 549407 buildd.debian.org,ivtools
> thanks
> 
> 2009/11/6 Roger Leigh :
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:20:31PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> >>
> >> I am looking at #549407 and noticed that both powerpc and sparc 
> >> autobuilders
> >> seem to use two temporary dirs at the same time,
> >
> > I think those buildds may be missing the binNMU versioning fix
> > in commit 817aea8c, but I don't have access to check that.
> 
> Thanks for the hint. May that be the origin for #549407?

Answering myself. No, it is not. I have prepared an sbuild+schroot setup in
a i386 box, using lenny schroot and bleeding edge sbuild (HEAD from sbuild
git repo, 355a4dffe742445713ea089436da077fc7a40ae8).

I can reproduce the problem with that sbuild version in the i386 box. 
However, I cannot reproduce it at all with pbuilder or with plain build in
normal filesystem.

ivtools uses imake to regenerate makefiles on each run. When the problem is
reproduced, I noticed that the path set by imake is something (wrong) like

.../buildd-ivtools_1.2.6-1+nmu2-1-2p04ki

while the real path is something like

.../buildd-ivtools_1.2.6-1+nmu2-powerpc-2p04ki

I tried to look how that happens, or at least find a workaround, but was
still unlucky. Why this does not happen in all autobuilders using new sbuild
is puzzling me.

More updates to this bug report. ivtools now builds in powerpc. It has now
been queued to "voltaire" (using old sbuild) instead of "praetorius" (using
the new one). The only arch where is not building is sparc, where "lebrun" has
been used for all failed builds.

> Build *suceeds* in amd64 (sbuild/amd64 98 on nautilus),  ia64
> (sbuild/ia64 98 on caballero),
> mips (sbuild/mips 99.99 on ball),  having what seems to be an old sbuild.
> 
> Build *suceeds* in alpha (sbuild 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on goetzs),
> armel (sbuild 0.58.2 (15 Jun
> 2009) on argento),  mipsel ( sbuild 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on rem), s390
> (sbuild 0.58.2 (31 Jul 2009)
> on debian-31), having the new sbuild.
> 
> Build *fails* in powerpc (sbuild 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on praetorius),
> sparc (sbuild 0.58.2 (15 Jun
> 2009) on lebrun), all having the new sbuild.

I wonder what is different between buildds using new sbuild that makes this
work in ones and fail in others.

-- 
Agustin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

mol-drivers-linux REMOVED from testing

2009-11-23 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the mol-drivers-linux source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.9.70+1-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557556: #557556 trousers: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386

2009-11-23 Thread Petr Salinger 

Hi,


The OFF_T_PRINTF #defines at the top of tools/ps_inspect.c seem very
buggy too me, I guess you should be checking this kind of things from
configure.



The easier way is to use patch bellow. The "long long" type
is mandatory in ISO C99 and supported for a very long time by gcc.

Petr

--- tools/ps_inspect.c
+++ tools/ps_inspect.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@

file_size = stat_buf.st_size;

-   PRINT("filename: %s (%" OFF_T_PRINTF " bytes)\n", argv[1], file_size);
+   PRINT("filename: %s (%lld bytes)\n", argv[1], (long long) file_size);

rc = inspect(f, file_size);





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#224518: sopwith: segfault in colltest()

2009-11-23 Thread Mikko Vartiainen 
Repeatable way to trigger this bug is to fire missiles over the edge
and game will crash. It's  not 100% certain that this is the same
problem. Sopwith has very little boundary checks so it's very easy to
corrupt internal data structures so same root cause can cause multiple
different crashes.

Attached patch fixes this problem. I had to use a small offset to
MAX_X, there's probably somewhere else something (graphics drawing?)
writing over the boundary otherwise.

-- 
Mikko Vartiainen


crash_missile_over_edge.patch
Description: Binary data

Bug#382105: marked as done (archmbox: bzip2 has moved to /bin)

2009-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:02:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#382105: fixed in archmbox 4.10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #382105,
regarding archmbox: bzip2 has moved to /bin
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
382105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382105
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: archmbox
Version: 4.9.0-1
Severity: normal


the script  has bzip2 set as /usr/bin/bzip2 the new location is
/bin/bzip2



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.13-xenU
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages archmbox depends on:
ii  bzip2  1.0.3-3   high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  perl   5.8.8-6   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  psmisc 22.2-1Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  uw-mailutils   7:2002edebian1-13 C-client support programs from UW

archmbox recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: archmbox
Source-Version: 4.10.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
archmbox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

archmbox_4.10.0-2.diff.gz
  to main/a/archmbox/archmbox_4.10.0-2.diff.gz
archmbox_4.10.0-2.dsc
  to main/a/archmbox/archmbox_4.10.0-2.dsc
archmbox_4.10.0-2_all.deb
  to main/a/archmbox/archmbox_4.10.0-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 382...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alberto Furia  (supplier of updated archmbox package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:19:47 +0100
Source: archmbox
Binary: archmbox
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.10.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Furia 
Changed-By: Alberto Furia 
Description: 
 archmbox   - a simple email archiver written in perl
Closes: 382105 547224
Changes: 
 archmbox (4.10.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Taking back maintainership. (Closes: #547224)
   * New build set bzip2 location to /bin/bzip2 (Closes: #382105)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4b4673478c277c3828e1650f0ad7dc7e0a2ab92c 1063 archmbox_4.10.0-2.dsc
 5ac339d2f0f18664350247f32b137a975aa6e2c3 25811 archmbox_4.10.0-2.diff.gz
 64f3d517099e5d1fd0d1c05a8e6fcf8b693c009a 37120 archmbox_4.10.0-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 82a361cf5aadb18452d1f27e834d53cb95c6ae75211d8a42c9c98371b99593e0 1063 
archmbox_4.10.0-2.dsc
 5bd505150992fa85bb26d877ccbf73549182bb30677c957f3c82ad2e71fdae70 25811 
archmbox_4.10.0-2.diff.gz
 b229a95f90482ccf8ab9e91c74a77d16bbb90545af391764e033f859ed96bf8f 37120 
archmbox_4.10.0-2_all.deb
Files: 
 0f3cefe3f2bf0e58cbc78e8feaa58d04 1063 mail optional archmbox_4.10.0-2.dsc
 f2e94725023aafaa7d184935f2139fba 25811 mail optional archmbox_4.10.0-2.diff.gz
 05bc5dc53c871042ad0075e0a55a00f4 37120 mail optional archmbox_4.10.0-2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksLA20ACgkQ5ItltUs5T37VNACgoXd3QmXSRO6Z5c95R3e4IF+C
eM8AoL2Udq/xlG2o21ElMjYDPnDVr687
=PS+U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#538364: marked as done ((gmanedit_0.4.2-1/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess})

2009-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:33:51 +0100
with message-id <1259015631.3129.524.ca...@vousci>
and subject line Solved in last version
has caused the Debian Bug report #538364,
regarding (gmanedit_0.4.2-1/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
538364: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538364
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gmanedit
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsm...@debian.org
Usertags: avr32

Hi,

Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.

Full build logs available:

  http://buildd.debian-ports.org/build.php?pkg=gmanedit&arch=avr32&ver=0.4.2-1

Regards,
Bradley Smith

--
Bradley Smith b...@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer bradsm...@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347   D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gmanedit
Version: 0.4.2-3

gmanedit 0.4.2-3 should solve the issue, since it copies up-to-date
files, though I forgot to mention this in debian/changelog

Pietro


signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
--- End Message ---

Bug#557690: Removed package(s) from unstable

2009-11-23 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

hg-buildpackage |1.0.4.1 | alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390, 
sparc
hg-buildpackage |1.0.4.2 | source, amd64, i386, kfreebsd-i386, powerpc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; NPOASR, orphaned, replacement available
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 557...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/557690

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Barry deFreese (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#554533: fixed

2009-11-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...

Concerning package libavifile-0.7-dev...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed section from devel to libdevel


Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 554...@bugs.debian.org.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Barry deFreese (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: medical profession listings

2009-11-23 Thread Mcintosh S Archie 



Get package deals for any of our USA Medical Marketing Lists. 
Get Discounts over 50%. 
For a rate card write to: ja...@bettermarketlists.in (please include this email 
when responding)























write to rem...@bettermarketlists.in to be permanently erased from this mailer.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557749: graphviz: different parallelograms have different angles

2009-11-23 Thread Piotr Engelking 
Package: graphviz
Version: 2.20.2-3+b4
Severity: wishlish

As seen on the attached picture, parallelograms with different aspect
ratios have very different angles (graphviz apparently defines them as
polygons with skew of .5 or something like that):

$ cat foo.dot
graph foo
{
node [shape="parallelogram"]

a
pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism
}
$ dot -T png < foo.dot > foo.png
$

This is not how parallelograms are conventionally used as graph nodes.
Please consider providing a way to produce parallelograms with angles
not depending on the aspect ratio.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages graphviz depends on:
hi  libc62.10.1-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libexpat12.0.1-5 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libgd2-xpm   2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-3.1 GD Graphics Library version 2
ii  libgraphviz4 2.20.2-3+b4 rich set of graph drawing tools
ii  libx11-6 2:1.2.2-1   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  2:1.0.6-1   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxmu6  2:1.0.4-2   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.6-1   X11 toolkit intrinsics library

Versions of packages graphviz recommends:
ii  ttf-liberation1.04.93-1  Free fonts with the same metrics a

Versions of packages graphviz suggests:
ii  graphviz-doc  2.20.2-3   additional documentation for graph
ii  gsfonts   1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre

-- no debconf information
<>