Re: Bug#654417: Migration on good tracks
Hi again. Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/02/2012): Broken packages (in unstable): arb/non-free openmsx rlvm spring tulip The following packages are marked as bad on the tracker[1]: - arb/non-free, missing libmotif-dev on other platforms, so not binNMU'd. Building non-free issue: #661280 - openmsx: binNMU FTBFS #660415 - rlvm: sid-only BinNMU'd on all platforms but powerpc, where it FTBFS: #638271 - spring: binNMU FTBFS #660450 - tulip: binNMU FTBFS, sid-only #650653 So I've hinted arb/non-free, openmsx, and spring for removal so that the transition can happen. Since outdated binaries were still around, I “simulated” a britney dry run by “forcing” glew in, which seemed to work fine. Hopefully tomorrow morning's (10:00Z) run should see packages migrate. I'll make sure all the above-mentioned packages have bugs filed against them, and I'll see what needs to be done to remove old glew binaries from testing. Done, and old glew binaries are gone. ben file moved away accordingly. Closing this bug report. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#649819: marked as done (openmsx: FTBFS: src/video/PNG.cc:170:21: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'png_info {aka struct png_info_def}')
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 +
with message-id e1s24fj-0001bw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#649819: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #649819,
regarding openmsx: FTBFS: src/video/PNG.cc:170:21: error: invalid use of
incomplete type 'png_info {aka struct png_info_def}'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
649819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: openmsx
Version: 0.8.1-4
Severity: wishlist
User: lib...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: libpng15-transition
Hi,
I uploaded libpng 1.5 to experimental.
libpng maintainers plan to transition from libpng 1.2 to 1.5.
I am checking build it the package depend to libpng.
I noticed your package FTBFS by libpng 1.5.
I attached build log.
Could you check your package?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
openmsx_0.8.1-4.2_amd64.build.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: openmsx
Source-Version: 0.8.2-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
to main/o/openmsx/openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 649...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org (supplier of updated openmsx package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:43:05 +0100
Source: openmsx
Binary: openmsx openmsx-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org
Description:
openmsx- MSX emulator that aims for perfection
openmsx-data - datafiles for openMSX, an MSX emulator
Closes: 634066 649819 659040 660415
Changes:
openmsx (0.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release. (Closes: #659040, #649819)
* Adopting the package. (Closes: #634066)
* Remove patches which are accepted upstream.
* Simplify build system.
* Include zlib.h instead of declaring the struct. (Closes: #660415)
Checksums-Sha1:
9be57cfc9ee5c3573f375308b458f4832fa7ee57 1323 openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
06bfb3c649ecc82d129bbe258d2167ea89ebacfa 2881089 openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
9aa2d60cab0635c7f41d83f093c18a4e4d74e351 9653 openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
878c2c00f059c4e1f126026e49d3a3a1348f15b7 2012286 openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
868b5115b0883c0749e1e7c37d37c65bd6af0b0b 1339434 openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
93e7b4cc8ad57bb1ec61412e02e4b19a6f25864345700d2fd270c0643e990a7a 1323
openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
437c43cda43adb7df84e2ae6180b6e76a9dfd92d177981b0c7d10bf16cc32411 2881089
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
193d11f1b8b856e979ff7375e4c10204192d035e76cf06a5543dde637353082c 9653
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
eed2652a5125aa888bac76e77516c52a795fc25ad92d8713cf6681ef07fb065b 2012286
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
cabc203f4d1beec838bb8d21fbefd8a0d2d0a0a423bc079694c74bc63ff908ee 1339434
openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
Files:
270abbdf46507cb39cf81c9b39c86aa3 1323 otherosfs optional openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
42bceabdd89a4986e745f74ac44da631 2881089 otherosfs optional
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
5c999df76f35fe6f2f760c708b8f 9653 otherosfs optional
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
fcd8f828cd13b99c6f6b0c942845e136 2012286 otherosfs optional
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
6ed822289258156e2b23fe98c7d7bf18 1339434 otherosfs optional
openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk9LvtoACgkQFShl+2J8z5XflACfW6SQZ/4FpxrAAfJ1VhCpxzMt
6ywAoKeezdGhHD0agrYUrAJyTVCp78Ys
=+LWw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
Bug#659040: marked as done (openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 + with message-id e1s24fj-0001bz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#659040: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #659040, regarding openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 659040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659040 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: openmsx Version: 0.8.1-4 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please upgrade openMSX in Debian to 0.8.2, it also fixes at least one Debian bug (the FTBFS). -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages openmsx depends on: ii cbios 0.25-2 ii libc6 2.13-24 ii libgcc1 1:4.6.2-12 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.11.2-1 ii libglew1.61.6.0-4 ii libogg0 1.2.2~dfsg-1 ii libpng12-01.2.46-4 ii libsdl-ttf2.0-0 2.0.9-1.1 ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.14-7 ii libstdc++64.6.2-12 ii libtheora01.1.1+dfsg.1-3 ii libvorbis0a 1.3.2-1.1 ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-7 ii openmsx-data 0.8.1-4 ii tcl8.58.5.11-1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 openmsx recommends no packages. Versions of packages openmsx suggests: pn openmsx-catapult 0.8.1-3 pn openmsx-debugger none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: openmsx Source-Version: 0.8.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openmsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb to main/o/openmsx/openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 659...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org (supplier of updated openmsx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:43:05 +0100 Source: openmsx Binary: openmsx openmsx-data Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.8.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org Changed-By: Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org Description: openmsx- MSX emulator that aims for perfection openmsx-data - datafiles for openMSX, an MSX emulator Closes: 634066 649819 659040 660415 Changes: openmsx (0.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. (Closes: #659040, #649819) * Adopting the package. (Closes: #634066) * Remove patches which are accepted upstream. * Simplify build system. * Include zlib.h instead of declaring the struct. (Closes: #660415) Checksums-Sha1: 9be57cfc9ee5c3573f375308b458f4832fa7ee57 1323 openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc 06bfb3c649ecc82d129bbe258d2167ea89ebacfa 2881089 openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz 9aa2d60cab0635c7f41d83f093c18a4e4d74e351 9653 openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz 878c2c00f059c4e1f126026e49d3a3a1348f15b7 2012286 openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb 868b5115b0883c0749e1e7c37d37c65bd6af0b0b 1339434 openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 93e7b4cc8ad57bb1ec61412e02e4b19a6f25864345700d2fd270c0643e990a7a 1323 openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc 437c43cda43adb7df84e2ae6180b6e76a9dfd92d177981b0c7d10bf16cc32411 2881089 openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz 193d11f1b8b856e979ff7375e4c10204192d035e76cf06a5543dde637353082c 9653 openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz eed2652a5125aa888bac76e77516c52a795fc25ad92d8713cf6681ef07fb065b 2012286 openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb cabc203f4d1beec838bb8d21fbefd8a0d2d0a0a423bc079694c74bc63ff908ee 1339434 openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb Files:
Bug#660415: marked as done (openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile')
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 + with message-id e1s24fj-0001c2...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#660415: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #660415, regarding openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660415 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: openmsx Severity: serious Tags: patch x-debbugs-cc: wij...@debian.org openmsx FTBFS in unstable with the following error. Compiling serialize.cc... g++ \ -MP -MMD -MF derived/x86_64-linux-debian/dep/serialize.d \ -o derived/x86_64-linux-debian/obj/serialize.o -g -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -m64 -pipe -Wall -Wextra -Wundef -Wunused-macros -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Isrc -Isrc/cassette -Isrc/commands -Isrc/config -Isrc/console -Isrc/cpu -Isrc/debugger -Isrc/events -Isrc/fdc -Isrc/file -Isrc/ide -Isrc/input -Isrc/laserdisc -Isrc/memory -Isrc/security -Isrc/serial -Isrc/settings -Isrc/sound -Isrc/thread -Isrc/utils -Isrc/video -Isrc/video/ld -Isrc/video/scalers -Isrc/video/v9990 -Iderived/x86_64-linux-debian/config -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DPACKAGE_NAME=tcl -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=tcl -DPACKAGE_VERSION=8.5 -DPACKAGE_STRING=tcl\\\ 8.5 -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT= -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_SETSTACKSIZE=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP=1 -DGETATTRNP_NOT_DECLARED=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -DTCL_CFGVAL_ENCODING=iso8859-1 -DMODULE_SCOPE=extern\ __attribute__\(\(__visibility__\(hidden\)\)\) -DTCL_SHLIB_EXT=.so -DTCL_CFG_OPTIMIZED=1 -DTCL_CFG_DEBUG=1 -DTCL_TOMMATH=1 -DMP_PREC=4 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_IS_LONG=1 -DHAVE_GETCWD=1 -DHAVE_OPENDIR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1 -DHAVE_WAITPID=1 -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO=1 -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R=1 -DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R=1 -DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R_6=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R_8=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R=1 -DUSE_TERMIOS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_GMTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_LOCALTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_MKTIME=1 -DHAVE_TM_GMTOFF=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE_VAR=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLOCKS=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLKSIZE=1 -DHAVE_BLKCNT_T=1 -DHAVE_INTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_UINTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_SIGNED_CHAR=1 -DHAVE_LANGINFO=1 -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1 -DTCL_UNLOAD_DLLS=1 -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -I/usr/include/libxml2-c src/serialize.cc In file included from src/serialize.cc:15:0: /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile' src/serialize.hh:20:15: error: 'gzFile' has a previous declaration as 'typedef void* gzFile' make[1]: *** [derived/x86_64-linux-debian/obj/serialize.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-openmsx_0.8.1-4+b1-amd64-0_JeL0/openmsx-0.8.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 This appears to be the result of a change in zlib.h changing how gzfile is defined. The attatched patch removes the definition of gzfile from serialize.hh and replaces it with an include of zlib.h Note: I'm ccing wij...@debian.org as he has expressed an intent to adopt this package. Description: Fix build with recent zlib replace definition of gzFile which conflicts with recent zlib with include of zlib.h Author: Peter Michael Green plugw...@p10link.net Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/??? --- The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add: Origin: vendor|upstream|other, url of original patch Bug: url in upstream bugtracker Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/bugnumber Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugnumber Forwarded: no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded Reviewed-By: name and email of someone who approved the patch Last-Update: -MM-DD ---
Bug#578046: currupts archives on 64bit systems with buffers larger than 2gb
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Yuri D'Elia wrote: Package: afio Severity: important Tags: patch When the block size * block count equals to 2gb or more, afio corrupts the archive by truncating all files larger than 2gb. [...] Thanks for the bug report and patch, I am reviewing and incorporating it in the upstream. The patch upgrades some uints to size_t, but it does not upgrade the count argument of readall to size_t, so I think this might lead to the achive ending up corrupt because not all data is written into it if your memory buffer (size * block count) is over 4GB and the file being archived is over 4 GB. I am not entirely sure, I have not tested it to verify, but just a warning: if you upgraded to 4GB memory buffer you might have gotten corrupt archives. Cheers, Koen. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.00.1202272345540.1958@noodle
Processing of apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s2de9-g4...@franck.debian.org
Bug#592006: marked as done (apt-build: Should use debchange instead of debchange --append)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#592006: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #592006,
regarding apt-build: Should use debchange instead of debchange --append
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
592006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.37
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
apt-build uses debchange --append to add entries on the changelog
file. Therefore, the change (build infos) is logged into the same log
entry as the official maintainer's one.
- First, the change is expected to be logged in a new entry, tagged
non-maintainer upload since it is generally indeed the case.
- Second, it means that the version of the local-built package will be the
same as the one from the official repository. This leads to a very
annoying bug with apt (see #351056). Indeed, after you've built all your
world and have stored them in your local repository, apt will want to
upgrade *all* your installed packages to the same version - the one from
your local repository - again and again...
These two issues are fixed by modifying debchange --append into
debchange. This will add a new entry in the change log, tag it as
non-maintainer upload if you're not recognized as author of the
package and increment the minor version as expected.
I've attached a patch to fix this that way (though it's not very
useful given the small size of the adjustment).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc6-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii apt 0.7.25.3 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii apt-utils 0.7.25.3 APT utility programs
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.33 Debian configuration management sy
ii devscripts2.10.66scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii dpkg-dev 1.15.8.3 Debian package development tools
ii g++ 4:4.4.4-2 The GNU C++ compiler
ii gcc 4:4.4.4-2 The GNU C compiler
ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii perl 5.10.1-13 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii build-essential 11.5 Informational list of build-essent
ii fakeroot 1.14.4-1 Gives a fake root environment
apt-build suggests no packages.
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
u'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build'
-- debconf information excluded
Index: apt-build-0.12.37/apt-build
===
--- apt-build-0.12.37.orig/apt-build 2010-08-06 21:41:42.0 +0200
+++ apt-build-0.12.37/apt-build 2010-08-06 21:44:26.0 +0200
@@ -288,11 +288,11 @@
chdir $src_name-$upver;
# Add an entry in changelog
-system debchange --append 'Built by apt-build';
+system debchange 'Built by apt-build';
for (@{$conf-patch})
{
$_ =~ s[.*/(.*)\n$][$1]gio; # basename + chomp
- system debchange --append 'Patched with $_';
+ system debchange 'Patched with $_';
}
# Patch if asked
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
$buildoptions = Build options: .
$conf-Olevel. .$conf-mtune. .$conf-options;
- system debchange --append \$buildoptions\;
+ system debchange \$buildoptions\;
# Now build
$r = !system $conf-build_command;
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the
Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id e1s2dnq-0001yb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #291565,
regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
291565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal
Hello Julien,
Here is the promised br ;-)
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in http://www.os-works.com/view/debian/packages/.
(apt-build 0.11.4)
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
==
this first hunk make sens to me as it stand in sub source and help me to
make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)
Anyway (as discust in private) you could had good reason to not apply :-)
This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
chdir $conf{build_dir};
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
(again just a work around ;-) )
just help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
--build-only libexo-dev
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
- Downloading exo source (exo 0.2.0-2) -
- Updating package lists -
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
- Building exo -
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux
--prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
--enable-final
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [config.status]
Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id e1s2dnq-0001ye...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #292169,
regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
292169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal
Hello Julien,
Here is the promised br ;-)
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in http://www.os-works.com/view/debian/packages/.
(apt-build 0.11.4)
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
==
this first hunk make sens to me as it stand in sub source and help me to
make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)
Anyway (as discust in private) you could had good reason to not apply :-)
This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
chdir $conf{build_dir};
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
(again just a work around ;-) )
just help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
--build-only libexo-dev
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
- Downloading exo source (exo 0.2.0-2) -
- Updating package lists -
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
- Building exo -
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux
--prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
--enable-final
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [config.status]
Bug#507881: marked as done (apt-build failes with sources using cmake)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#507881: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #507881, regarding apt-build failes with sources using cmake to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 507881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507881 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.37 Severity: normal when source package uses cmake (such as KDE 4 or phonon), it probes for compiler and the calls is directly (/usr/lib/apt-build/g++) when doing so, build failes. when building the source using regualr debian/rules binary-arch everything is fine. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-10 Locale: LANG=he_IL, LC_CTYPE=he_IL (charmap=ISO-8859-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages apt-build depends on: ii apt 0.7.18 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-utils 0.7.18 APT utility programs ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy ii devscripts2.10.35scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev 1.14.23Debian package development tools ii g++ 4:4.3.2-2 The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.3.2-2 The GNU C compiler ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.22+b1 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii perl 5.10.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages apt-build recommends: ii build-essential 11.4 Informational list of build-essent ii fakeroot 1.11 Gives a fake root environment apt-build suggests no packages. -- debconf information: apt-build/arch_amd: k6 apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4 * apt-build/options: -march=pentium3 * apt-build/arch_intel: pentium3 apt-build/arch_arm: armv2 * apt-build/make_options: -j2 * apt-build/olevel: Strong * apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build * apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64 * apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: false ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 507...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
Bug#425044: marked as done (apt-build cannot find source package gtk+2.0)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#425044: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #425044, regarding apt-build cannot find source package gtk+2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 425044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.28 Severity: normal ~ apt-build install libgtk2.0-dev Unable to find source information for libgtk2.0-dev at /usr/bin/apt-build line 482. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (800, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (60, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.4.34 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE) Versions of packages apt-build depends on: ii apt 0.6.46.4-0.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-utils 0.6.46.4-0.1 APT utility programs ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy ii devscripts 2.9.26 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev1.13.25 package building tools for Debian ii g++ 4:4.1.1-15 The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.1.1-15 The GNU C compiler ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.20 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii perl5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages apt-build recommends: ii build-essential 11.3 informational list of build-essent ii fakeroot 1.5.10 Gives a fake root environment - -- debconf information: apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4 apt-build/arch_arm: armv2 * apt-build/olevel: Strong * apt-build/build_dir: /misc/build apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc apt-build/arch_amd: k6 * apt-build/options: * apt-build/arch_intel: pentium4 * apt-build/make_options: * apt-build/repository_dir: /misc/debian-build apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64 * apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true - -- Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/ pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRk3bQZ+OKpjRpO3lAQJsswgAmD4n7JVVtjPAmo+m8c8H6nALICDIJfyy TPGmK0R5JAcyhtVf/nqhv9uKATAUdK56fsrHylyQkXpsLh0ob4omg61c5ewTrgv8 E3vPVEb6l4i+zgAqqphmrAdd3u+X/hv4lVYcl+aZj2eCR5dCaPJMkZ7W++3ODdg0 ymqdKTiVrUo+8JnA6g1eLHRFoxq/EpGnQRJ2hSjsKBqL8rl1ecEboXnmpbLCgZEc RDUDylo8WVlKm+utdFTzMtA6qAMZn9/TNKMQiek6Jm1pZnc/3UTF4ij/y+yHK9mq +SX6+3NrC/uCtDGMrgy/cprl59w72FR7bBEbmo2WDtGqtGQrLj3pxw== =/Lw6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 425...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881
Bug#369173: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001ys...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#316572: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #316572, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 316572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316572 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.17 apt-build install coreutils fails: WARNUNG: Die folgenden Pakete können nicht authentifiziert werden! coreutils E: Es gab Probleme und -y wurde ohne --force-yes verwendet There was a question about this problem september last year on debian-users, but no answears: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/09/msg01402.html I think it should not be necessary to do any additional steps (creating keys, etc) just to get some package installed. Whatever is necessary should be done by installing apt-build. Philipp ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 316...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881 * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449, #592006 * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296 * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning. * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169 * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590 * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9. * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3. Checksums-Sha1: 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Checksums-Sha256:
Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id e1s2dnq-0001ye...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #292169, regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 292169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292169 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.8 apt-build wll not build a package whose source is uploaded but its binary is not. For instance, most architectures aside from i386 do not have binary packages the same day the source is apt'able. So the apt source exists but apt-build install fails. The offending code is in the install module. An apt-get -y --print-uris install is run. Instead an apt-get -y --print-uris source should be used. However, this breaks other checks in the install module like the check for arch independent packages. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 292...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881 * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449, #592006 * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296 * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning. * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169 * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590 * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9. * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3. Checksums-Sha1: 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Checksums-Sha256: 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550
Bug#596296: marked as done (apt-build: assumes sources.list is used and fails when all package sources are stored in sources.list.d)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001ze...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#596296: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #596296, regarding apt-build: assumes sources.list is used and fails when all package sources are stored in sources.list.d to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 596296: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596296 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.37 Severity: normal albin@nyx:~$ ls /etc/apt/ apt-build.conf old-sourcessources.list.d trusted.gpg.d apt.conf.d preferencestrustdb.gpg apt-file.conf preferences.d trusted.gpg listbugssecring.gpgtrusted.gpg~ During config: add line to sources.list? yes Setting up apt-build (0.12.37) ... dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please use '--print-architecture' instead. grep: /etc/apt/sources.list: No such file or directory albin@nyx:~$ sudo apt-build update Ignoring file 'apt-build' in directory '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/' as it has no filename extension Opening /etc/apt/sources.list - ifstream::ifstream (2: No such file or directory) You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list Notice how it also creates an out-of-place file in sources.list.d/ -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages apt-build depends on: ii apt 0.8.0 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-utils 0.8.0 APT utility programs ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.35 Debian configuration management sy ii devscripts2.10.66scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev 1.15.8.4 Debian package development tools ii g++ 4:4.4.4-2 The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.4.4-2 The GNU C compiler ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24+b1 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii perl 5.10.1-14 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages apt-build recommends: ii build-essential 11.5 Informational list of build-essent ii fakeroot 1.14.4-1 Gives a fake root environment apt-build suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build' -- debconf information: apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4 apt-build/arch_arm: armv2 * apt-build/olevel: Medium apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc apt-build/arch_amd: k6 apt-build/options: * apt-build/arch_intel: pentium apt-build/make_options: apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64 * apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id e1s2dnq-0001ye...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #292169,
regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available
is back]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
292169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Severity: normal
- Forwarded message from Joel Soete soete.j...@tiscali.be -
From: Joel Soete soete.j...@tiscali.be
To: Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
Subject: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:43 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.2
Hello Julien,
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in http://www.os-works.com/view/debian/packages/.
(apt-build 0.11.4)
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
==
this first hunk make sens as it stand in sub source and help me to make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)
This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
chdir $conf{build_dir};
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root root@debian
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux
--prefix=/usr
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler
cannot create executables
Bug#316572: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001yw...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#369173: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #369173, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 369173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369173 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt was upgraded and now seems to use GPG checks for installing packages. apt-build doesn't handle this change, a priori, according to this log : - Moving packages to repository - - Building repository - - Updating package lists - Ign file: apt-build Release.gpg Get:1 file: apt-build Release [89B] Ign file: apt-build/main Packages Get:2 http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release.gpg [197B] Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release.gpg Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release.gpg Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Sources Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources Fetched 90B in 1s (54B/s) Reading package lists... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Suggested packages: cdtool setcd hal-doc dialog Recommended packages: librsvg2-bin libterm-size-perl libterm-readkey-perl The following packages will be upgraded: eject grep libhal-dev libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 libhal0 libldap-2.2-7 librsvg2-2 librsvg2-common librsvg2-dev module-assistant net-tools 12 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 723kB/1333kB of archives. After unpacking 262kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! net-tools libhal-dev libhal0 libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes An apt-cache show net-tools give me : # apt-cache show net-tools Package: net-tools Priority: important Section: net Installed-Size: 756 Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels e...@debian.org Architecture: i386 Version: 1.60-15 Replaces: netbase ( 4.00) Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) Filename: ./net-tools_1.60-15_i386.deb Size: 244628 MD5sum: cca4ed10446c6449a7e3550c5d103371 Description: The NET-3 networking toolkit This package includes the important tools for controlling the network subsystem of the Linux kernel. This includes arp, ifconfig, netstat, rarp, nameif and route. Additionally, this package contains utilities relating to particular network hardware types (plipconfig, slattach, mii-tool) and advanced aspects of IP configuration (iptunnel, ipmaddr). . In the upstream package 'hostname' and friends are included. Those are not installed by this package, since there is a special hostname*.deb. Package: net-tools Priority: important Section: net Installed-Size: 656 Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels e...@debian.org Architecture: i386 Version: 1.60-15 Replaces: netbase ( 4.00) Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) Filename:
Bug#624365: marked as done (apt-build: Fails to find source package)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#624365: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #624365, regarding apt-build: Fails to find source package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624365 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.38 Severity: normal While apt-get source iceweasel works fine, apt-build fails to find the source package for iceweasel: $ apt-build install iceweasel iceweasel will not be built because it doesn't have a source package. Missing source package name for source_by_source(). Best regards Torquil Sørensen -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (400, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages apt-build depends on: ii apt 0.8.14.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-utils 0.8.14.1 APT utility programs ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration management sy ii devscripts2.10.72scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev 1.16.0.2 Debian package development tools ii g++ 4:4.5.2-5 The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.5.2-5 The GNU C compiler ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24+b1 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii libc6 2.11.2-13 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii perl 5.10.1-20 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages apt-build recommends: ii build-essential 11.5 Informational list of build-essent ii fakeroot 1.15.1-1 tool for simulating superuser priv apt-build suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list' -- debconf-show failed ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes
Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id e1s2dnq-0001yv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #179850,
regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
179850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal
Hello Julien,
Here is the promised br ;-)
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in http://www.os-works.com/view/debian/packages/.
(apt-build 0.11.4)
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
==
this first hunk make sens to me as it stand in sub source and help me to
make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)
Anyway (as discust in private) you could had good reason to not apply :-)
This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
chdir $conf{build_dir};
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
(again just a work around ;-) )
just help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
--build-only libexo-dev
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
- Downloading exo source (exo 0.2.0-2) -
- Updating package lists -
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
- Building exo -
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux
--prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
--enable-final
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [config.status]
Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id e1s2dnq-0001yb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #291565, regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 291565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291565 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.8 apt-build wll not build a package whose source is uploaded but its binary is not. For instance, most architectures aside from i386 do not have binary packages the same day the source is apt'able. So the apt source exists but apt-build install fails. The offending code is in the install module. An apt-get -y --print-uris install is run. Instead an apt-get -y --print-uris source should be used. However, this breaks other checks in the install module like the check for arch independent packages. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 291...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881 * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449, #592006 * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296 * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning. * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169 * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590 * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9. * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3. Checksums-Sha1: 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Checksums-Sha256: 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550
Bug#511853: marked as done ([apt-build] fails to install because of error in post-installation script)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#511853: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #511853, regarding [apt-build] fails to install because of error in post-installation script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.37 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- apt errormessage: Errors were encountered while processing: apt-build E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up apt-build (0.12.37) ... mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing apt-build (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: apt-build --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Debian Release: 5.0 500 unstableftp.no.debian.org 500 unstableftp.acc.umu.se 500 unstabledebian.cihar.com 500 testing security.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+- libc6 (= 2.7-1) | 2.7-18 perl | 5.10.0-19 apt (= 0.5) | 0.7.20 gcc | 4:4.3.2-2 g++ | 4:4.3.2-2 dpkg-dev (= 1.9) | 1.14.24 libappconfig-perl(= 1.5) | 1.56-2 libapt-pkg-perl (= 0.1.11) | 0.1.22+b1 debconf | 1.5.24 OR debconf-2.0 | devscripts| 2.10.44 apt-utils | 0.7.20 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code
Bug#660590: marked as done (apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zo...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#660590: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #660590, regarding apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660590 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.40 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded... This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3, which says [These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good citizens. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring out how to do this properly. In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with severity serious. From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): (upgrade test squeeze - sid) Setting up apt-build (0.12.40) ... Configuration file `/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list' == File on system created by you or by a script. == File also in package provided by package maintainer. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** apt-build.list (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing apt-build (--configure): EOF on stdin at conffile prompt configured to not write apport reports Errors were encountered while processing: apt-build cheers, Andreas apt-build_0.12.40.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 660...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes:
Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id e1s2dnq-0001yb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #291565,
regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available
is back]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
291565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Severity: normal
- Forwarded message from Joel Soete soete.j...@tiscali.be -
From: Joel Soete soete.j...@tiscali.be
To: Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
Subject: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:43 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.2
Hello Julien,
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in http://www.os-works.com/view/debian/packages/.
(apt-build 0.11.4)
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
==
this first hunk make sens as it stand in sub source and help me to make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)
This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
chdir $conf{build_dir};
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root root@debian
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux
--prefix=/usr
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler
cannot create executables
Bug#392844: marked as done (apt-build: wrong option listed on --help and fails with aptitude backend)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id e1s2dnr-0001z7...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#392844: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #392844,
regarding apt-build: wrong option listed on --help and fails with aptitude
backend
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
392844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.24
Severity: important
Hi,
I have problem with apt-build because on help says:
(...)
Options:
--apt-get - Specify an alternative apt-get application to use
(...)
but don't work.. I get:
# apt-build --apt-get=aptitude world
Unknown option: apt-get
and when I try with --apt_get work, but the apt-build calls 'aptitude
--yes' and crash...
***
# apt-build --apt_get=aptitude world
Couldn't stat source package list file: apt-build/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/_var_cache_apt-build_repository_dists_apt-build_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
- Rebuilding the world! -
- Building package list -
W: Couldn't stat source package list file: apt-build/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/_var_cache_apt-build_repository_dists_apt-build_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list file: apt-build/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/_var_cache_apt-build_repository_dists_apt-build_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
- Installing build dependencies (for firefox) -
aptitude: unrecognized option `--yes'
aptitude 0.4.1
Usage: aptitude [-S fname] [-u|-i]
aptitude [options] action ...
Actions (if none is specified, aptitude will enter interactive mode):
(...messages of aptitude --help)
This aptitude does not have Super Cow Powers.
- Updating package lists -
aptitude: unrecognized option `--yes'
aptitude 0.4.1
Usage: aptitude [-S fname] [-u|-i]
aptitude [options] action ...
Actions (if none is specified, aptitude will enter interactive mode):
(...messages of aptitude --help)
This aptitude does not have Super Cow Powers.
- Downloading source firefox (1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-1) -
aptitude: unrecognized option `--yes'
aptitude 0.4.1
Usage: aptitude [-S fname] [-u|-i]
aptitude [options] action ...
Actions (if none is specified, aptitude will enter interactive mode):
install - Install/upgrade packages
(...messages of aptitude --help)
This aptitude does not have Super Cow Powers.
- Building firefox -
Can't chdir(firefox-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7): No such file or directory at
(eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('firefox-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7') called at
/usr/bin/apt-build line 288
main::build('firefox', '1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7', 'undef') called at
/usr/bin/apt-build line 510
main::install('undef') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 714
main::world called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
***
Then.. I suggest you to use '-y' option instead of '--yes'. It's
compatible with apt-get and aptitude. Ah.. please.. fix the '--help' too
for '--apt_get' instead of '--apt-get'.
Thanks a lot.. sorry for my poor english... ;)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (999, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to pt_BR)
Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii apt-utils 0.6.44.2 APT utility programs
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy
ii devscripts2.9.20 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.21package building tools for Debian
ii g++ 4:4.0.3-4 The GNU C++ compiler
ii gcc 4:4.0.3-4 The GNU C compiler
ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.20 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's
Bug#316572: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001ys...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#316572: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #316572, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 316572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316572 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt was upgraded and now seems to use GPG checks for installing packages. apt-build doesn't handle this change, a priori, according to this log : - Moving packages to repository - - Building repository - - Updating package lists - Ign file: apt-build Release.gpg Get:1 file: apt-build Release [89B] Ign file: apt-build/main Packages Get:2 http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release.gpg [197B] Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release.gpg Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release.gpg Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Sources Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources Fetched 90B in 1s (54B/s) Reading package lists... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Suggested packages: cdtool setcd hal-doc dialog Recommended packages: librsvg2-bin libterm-size-perl libterm-readkey-perl The following packages will be upgraded: eject grep libhal-dev libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 libhal0 libldap-2.2-7 librsvg2-2 librsvg2-common librsvg2-dev module-assistant net-tools 12 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 723kB/1333kB of archives. After unpacking 262kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! net-tools libhal-dev libhal0 libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes An apt-cache show net-tools give me : # apt-cache show net-tools Package: net-tools Priority: important Section: net Installed-Size: 756 Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels e...@debian.org Architecture: i386 Version: 1.60-15 Replaces: netbase ( 4.00) Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) Filename: ./net-tools_1.60-15_i386.deb Size: 244628 MD5sum: cca4ed10446c6449a7e3550c5d103371 Description: The NET-3 networking toolkit This package includes the important tools for controlling the network subsystem of the Linux kernel. This includes arp, ifconfig, netstat, rarp, nameif and route. Additionally, this package contains utilities relating to particular network hardware types (plipconfig, slattach, mii-tool) and advanced aspects of IP configuration (iptunnel, ipmaddr). . In the upstream package 'hostname' and friends are included. Those are not installed by this package, since there is a special hostname*.deb. Package: net-tools Priority: important Section: net Installed-Size: 656 Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels e...@debian.org Architecture: i386 Version: 1.60-15 Replaces: netbase ( 4.00) Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) Filename:
Bug#434859: marked as done (apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with +b1)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zh...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#434859: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #434859, regarding apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with +b1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 434859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.28 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages apt-build depends on: ii apt 0.7.3 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-utils 0.7.3 APT utility programs ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy ii devscripts2.10.6 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev 1.14.5 package building tools for Debian ii g++ 4:4.1.1-15 The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.1.1-15 The GNU C compiler ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.21 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii perl 5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages apt-build recommends: ii build-essential 11.3 informational list of build-essent ii fakeroot 1.7.1 Gives a fake root environment -- debconf information: apt-build/arch_amd: k6 apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4 * apt-build/options: -march=pentium3m -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer * apt-build/arch_intel: pentium3m apt-build/arch_arm: armv2 * apt-build/make_options: * apt-build/olevel: Medium * apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build * apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64 * apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true When a package version number is terminated with +b1, apt-build download and install a version without this extension, and download and --reinstall the original version with +b1. This bug is very annoying because in the case of a multiple binaries source package, the whole set of binary packages is rebuilt with each single package building query... for nothing ! I don't know the meaning of this +b1 debian revision number, but I'd like to know if, in the wait of a fix some day, I can rename my rebuilt packages by adding the +b1 without compromising the integrity of my system ? regards Marc Gasnot ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 434...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite.
Bug#520818: marked as done ([apt-build] apt-build fails to install)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001zr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#511853: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #511853, regarding [apt-build] apt-build fails to install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.37 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Errors were encountered while processing: apt-build E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up apt-build (0.12.37) ... mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing apt-build (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: apt-build --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Debian Release: 5.0 500 unstabledebian.cihar.com 500 stable security.debian.org 500 stable ftp.no.debian.org 500 stable ftp.acc.umu.se --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed =-+- libc6 (= 2.7-1) | 2.7-18 perl | 5.10.0-19 apt (= 0.5) | 0.7.20.2 gcc | 4:4.3.2-3 g++ | 4:4.3.2-3 dpkg-dev (= 1.9) | 1.14.25 libappconfig-perl(= 1.5) | 1.56-2 libapt-pkg-perl (= 0.1.11) | 0.1.22+b1 debconf | 1.5.24 OR debconf-2.0 | devscripts| 2.10.45 apt-utils | 0.7.20.2 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881 * Build with local version
Bug#369173: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id e1s2dnr-0001yw...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#369173: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #369173, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 369173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369173 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.17 apt-build install coreutils fails: WARNUNG: Die folgenden Pakete können nicht authentifiziert werden! coreutils E: Es gab Probleme und -y wurde ohne --force-yes verwendet There was a question about this problem september last year on debian-users, but no answears: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/09/msg01402.html I think it should not be necessary to do any additional steps (creating keys, etc) just to get some package installed. Whatever is necessary should be done by installing apt-build. Philipp ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 369...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881 * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449, #592006 * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296 * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning. * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169 * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590 * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9. * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3. Checksums-Sha1: 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Checksums-Sha256:
Bug#315102: marked as done (apt-build: build-source downloads other version than it tries to build)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id e1s2dnr-0001yk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#315102: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #315102,
regarding apt-build: build-source downloads other version than it tries to build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
315102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: normal
maybe related, but not same, to 307677
apt-build build-source downloads other version than it tries to build.
apt-get source is ok, apt-build install installs version
with higher priority (in the example kpdf 4:3.3.2-2).
For packages, where there is only one version works ok.
situation in examples -
default distribution: unstable
kpdf 4:3.3.2-2 in unstable
kpdf 4:3.4.1-1 in experimental
(source package: kdegraphics)
psi 0.9.3-1 (the only version in archives)
example - listing of the use with various parameters:
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update
build-source kpdf
Building the following packages from source:
- Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
- Downloading source kdegraphics (3.4.1-1) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
- Building kdegraphics -
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update
build-source kdegraphics
Building the following packages from source:
- Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
- Downloading source kdegraphics (3.4.1-1) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
- Building kdegraphics -
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update
build-source kdegraphics=4:3.3.2-2
Building the following packages from source:
- Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
- Downloading source kdegraphics (3.3.2-2) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
- Building kdegraphics -
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update
build-source kdegraphics=4:3.4.1-1
Building the following packages from source:
- Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
- Downloading source kdegraphics (3.4.1-1) -
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
- Building kdegraphics -
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id e1s2dnq-0001yv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #179850,
regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available
is back]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
179850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-build
Severity: normal
- Forwarded message from Joel Soete soete.j...@tiscali.be -
From: Joel Soete soete.j...@tiscali.be
To: Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
Subject: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:43 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.2
Hello Julien,
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in http://www.os-works.com/view/debian/packages/.
(apt-build 0.11.4)
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
==
this first hunk make sens as it stand in sub source and help me to make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)
This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
chdir $conf{build_dir};
- read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |, ^',
+ read_apt_list(apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |, ^',
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});
help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root root@debian
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux
--prefix=/usr
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler
cannot create executables
Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id e1s2dnq-0001yv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #179850, regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 179850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179850 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-build Version: 0.8 apt-build wll not build a package whose source is uploaded but its binary is not. For instance, most architectures aside from i386 do not have binary packages the same day the source is apt'able. So the apt source exists but apt-build install fails. The offending code is in the install module. An apt-get -y --print-uris install is run. Instead an apt-get -y --print-uris source should be used. However, this breaks other checks in the install module like the check for arch independent packages. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-build Source-Version: 0.12.42 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 179...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com (supplier of updated apt-build package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100 Source: apt-build Binary: apt-build Architecture: source mipsel Version: 0.12.42 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre lasserr...@gmail.com Description: apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Changes: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes: #316572, #369173 * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates. * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question priority to high. * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy. * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop). Closes: #511853 * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp debconf stuff (configuration file handling). * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache. (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844 * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102, #425044, #434859 * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365 * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881 * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449, #592006 * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296 * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning. * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169 * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590 * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9. * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3. Checksums-Sha1: 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Checksums-Sha256: 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Override entries for your package: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc - source devel apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb - optional devel Announcing to debian-experimental-chan...@lists.debian.org Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s2dnq-0001yj...@franck.debian.org
