Processing of ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
  ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
  ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
  ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sks4w-0006cx...@ravel.debian.org

Processing of ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
  ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
  ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sks7y-0004b0...@franck.debian.org

ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 



Accepted:
ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
  to main/p/ppmd/ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
  to main/p/ppmd/ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb
  to main/p/ppmd/ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb


Changes:
ppmd (10.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Orphan package, set maintainer to Debian QA Group.
  * Rename README.Debian to README.source.
  * Update README.source information.
  * Now using Standards-Version 3.9.3 (no changes needed).


Override entries for your package:
ppmd_10.1-5.dsc - source utils
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb - optional utils

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skszz-00052z...@franck.debian.org

[bts-link] source package sflphone

2012-04-19 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package sflphone
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #601164 (http://bugs.debian.org/601164)
# Bug title: sflphoned: Uniformative SFLPHONED(1)
#  * https://projects.savoirfairelinux.com/issues/4364
#  * remote status changed: Resolved - Accepted
usertags 601164 - status-Resolved
usertags 601164 + status-Accepted

thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120419163729.1440.5158.btsl...@busoni.debian.org

Processing of libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_amd64.changes

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.dsc
  libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.debian.tar.gz
  libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_all.deb
  libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb
  libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skuhh-0002yo...@franck.debian.org

libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 



Accepted:
libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb
  to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb
libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb
  to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.debian.tar.gz
  to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.debian.tar.gz
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.dsc
  to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.dsc
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_all.deb
  to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_all.deb


Changes:
libgui-commands-java (1.1.43-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * QA upload.
  * Remove simple-patchsys.mk and upgrade to packaging format 3.0 quilt
(Closes: #669144).
  * Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3 and debhelper to 9.
  * Update obsolete default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk (E: Lintian) and
add Build-Depends libgcj-common.
  * Fix needless-dependency-on-jre (Lintian).
  * Fix missing-classpath (Lintian).


Override entries for your package:
libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb - optional doc
libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb - optional libs
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.dsc - source java
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_all.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 669144 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skukw-00040a...@franck.debian.org

libgui-commands-java override disparity

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.


[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail.  Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skukg-00040x...@franck.debian.org

Bug#669144: marked as done ([PATCH] libgui-commands-java: packaging 3.0 and fix build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep)

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:02:28 +
with message-id e1skukw-00040g...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#669144: fixed in libgui-commands-java 1.1.43-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #669144,
regarding [PATCH] libgui-commands-java: packaging 3.0 and fix 
build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
669144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libgui-commands-java
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

The build depends list package that has been obsoleted.

See attached patch to help to fix this and other things related
to new features and items reported by Lintian etc.

Let me know if there is anything that needs adjusting or if it is ok
to upload this version in a NMU in case you are working on other
issues needing attention.

Thanks,
Jari

From f84e70bf1d2b96b43adc43cc8451b67747e92602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:14:05 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] obsolete-default-jdk
Organization: Private
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
---
 debian/changelog |   11 +++
 debian/compat|2 +-
 debian/control   |6 +++---
 debian/rules |   10 +-
 debian/source/format |1 +
 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 debian/source/format

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f6bf128..6b53f18 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libgui-commands-java (1.1.43-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * QA upload.
+  * Remove simple-patchsys.mk and upgrade to packaging format 3.0 quilt.
+  * Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3 and debhelper to 9.
+  * Update obsolete default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk (E: Lintian).
+  * Fix needless-dependency-on-jre (Lintian).
+  * Fix missing-classpath (Lintian).
+
+ -- Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net  Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:05:12 +0300
+
 libgui-commands-java (1.1.43-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * QA upload.
diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
index 7ed6ff8..ec63514 100644
--- a/debian/compat
+++ b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+9
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index b46e38b..7d884b9 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ Section: java
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
 Homepage: https://gui-commands.dev.java.net/
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 5.0.0), cdbs, patchutils, ant, default-jdk-builddep, libjaxen-java
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), cdbs, patchutils, ant, default-jdk, libjaxen-java
 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-java/trunk/libgui-commands-java/
 Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/libgui-commands-java/
-Standards-Version: 3.8.2
+Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 
 Package: libgui-commands-java
 Architecture: all
-Depends: gij | java-gcj-compat | java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libjaxen-java, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: libjaxen-java, ${misc:Depends}
 Description: command framework for Java Swing GUIs
  GUI Commands is a comprehensive command framework for Java Swing user
  interface applications. Conceptually it is similar to Swings Actions, but
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 77ae5f9..254e9a6 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
 
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ant.mk
 
 JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/default-java
 ANT_HOME  := /usr/share/ant
+LIB	  := /usr/share/java/jaxen.jar
 
 DEB_JARS := jaxen
 
@@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(gcj_native_archs)))
 endif
 
 install/libgui-commands-java::
+	# repack with Class-Path in manifest file.
+	cd build  \
+	file=META-INF/MANIFEST.MF ; \
+	jar -xf gui-commands.jar  \
+		sed -i '/^[ \r\t]*$$/d' $$file  \
+		/bin/echo -e Class-Path: $(LIB)\r  $$file  \
+	jar -cfm gui-commands.jar $$file .
+
 	mv build/gui-commands.jar build/gui-commands-$(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION).jar
 	dh_install -plibgui-commands-java build/gui-commands-$(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION).jar usr/share/java/
 	dh_link -plibgui-commands-java usr/share/java/gui-commands-$(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION).jar usr/share/java/gui-commands.jar
diff --git a/debian/source/format b/debian/source/format
new file mode 100644
index 000..163aaf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/source/format
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+3.0 (quilt)
--

Bug#669456: kerneloops: FTBFS: kerneloops.c:36:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory

2012-04-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
Source: kerneloops
Version: 0.12+git20090217-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 cc -O2 -g -fstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes 
 -Wundef -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration 
 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wformat -Wformat-security 
 -Werror=format-security `pkg-config --cflags libnotify gtk+-2.0 dbus-glib-1` 
 -c -o kerneloops.o kerneloops.c
 Package dbus-glib-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
 Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-glib-1.pc'
 to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
 No package 'dbus-glib-1' found
 kerneloops.c:36:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory
 compilation terminated.
 make[1]: *** [kerneloops.o] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/04/19/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120419191343.ga12...@xanadu.blop.info

Processing of kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
  kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
  kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skxgl-qg...@franck.debian.org

Bug#669456: marked as done (kerneloops: FTBFS: kerneloops.c:36:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory)

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:51:54 +
with message-id e1skyky-oj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#669456: fixed in kerneloops 0.12+git20090217-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #669456,
regarding kerneloops: FTBFS: kerneloops.c:36:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such 
file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
669456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: kerneloops
Version: 0.12+git20090217-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 cc -O2 -g -fstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes 
 -Wundef -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration 
 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wformat -Wformat-security 
 -Werror=format-security `pkg-config --cflags libnotify gtk+-2.0 dbus-glib-1` 
 -c -o kerneloops.o kerneloops.c
 Package dbus-glib-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
 Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-glib-1.pc'
 to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
 No package 'dbus-glib-1' found
 kerneloops.c:36:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory
 compilation terminated.
 make[1]: *** [kerneloops.o] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/04/19/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: kerneloops
Source-Version: 0.12+git20090217-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kerneloops, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 669...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org (supplier of updated kerneloops package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:06:26 +0200
Source: kerneloops
Binary: kerneloops kerneloops-daemon kerneloops-applet
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.12+git20090217-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org
Description: 
 kerneloops - kernel oops tracker (transitional package)
 kerneloops-applet - applet for the kernel oops tracker
 kerneloops-daemon - kernel oops tracker
Closes: 669456
Changes: 
 kerneloops (0.12+git20090217-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Add missing build dependency on libdbus-glib-1-dev (Closes: #669456)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4b58d94a3f330fd9e34683a6876a1d447875c6b8 2163 kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
 c4c8fa5f7b5cd991fc49698ab5d94073c576608f 6866 
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
 1940a4e8bba3400d86db42096d592c1f3f9cd60a 3588 
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
 1ed3ba13e301793ead4c32c8a38fe303c1f900d9 16652 
kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
 fb1a6c478384f2ec5079e4fd1bc0bb0cf041c745 16898 
kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d860aa22e75f20474398784bb57320b42bf6ec6340f4b43c440c5a403e61006e 2163 
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc

Processing of kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes removed.

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skyek-0008ir...@franck.debian.org

kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 



Accepted:
kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb


Changes:
kerneloops (0.12+git20090217-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * QA upload.
  * Add missing build dependency on libdbus-glib-1-dev (Closes: #669456)


Override entries for your package:
kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb - optional utils
kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb - optional utils
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc - source utils
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb - optional utils

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 669456 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skyky-od...@franck.debian.org

kerneloops override disparity

2012-04-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb: package says section is oldlibs, 
override says utils.
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, 
override says optional.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.


[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail.  Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skykh-ow...@franck.debian.org

Re: merging w3c-dtd-xhtml and w3c-sml-lib: ten days to object or find issues

2012-04-19 Thread Joey Hess 
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
 I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
 w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of
 links). I have endeavoured to fix all conflicts and ensure that
 nsgmls, wdg-html-validator, w3c-markup-validator still work. I have
 to put a caveat on that. As far as I can see wdg-html-validator no
 longer works at all well. So I mean that my new versions do not make
 it worse.

It was working 100% fine before your change, and now it fails miserably.
#669480

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: reassign 669480 to wdg-html-validator

2012-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 669480 wdg-html-validator
Bug #669480 [w3c-html-validator] w3c-html-validator is 100% broken by recent 
w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-2)
Warning: Unknown package 'w3c-html-validator'
Bug reassigned from package 'w3c-html-validator' to 'wdg-html-validator'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #669480 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #669480 to the same values 
previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
669480: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669480
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133487205912930.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: merging w3c-dtd-xhtml and w3c-sml-lib: ten days to object or find issues

2012-04-19 Thread Nicholas Bamber 

Joey,
	Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not afterwards 
because I tried to test it.


On 19/04/12 22:46, Joey Hess wrote:

Nicholas Bamber wrote:

I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of
links). I have endeavoured to fix all conflicts and ensure that
nsgmls, wdg-html-validator, w3c-markup-validator still work. I have
to put a caveat on that. As far as I can see wdg-html-validator no
longer works at all well. So I mean that my new versions do not make
it worse.


It was working 100% fine before your change, and now it fails miserably.
#669480




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f909739.1070...@periapt.co.uk

Re: merging w3c-dtd-xhtml and w3c-sml-lib: ten days to object or find issues

2012-04-19 Thread Joey Hess 
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
   Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not
 afterwards because I tried to test it.

w3c-sgml-lib provides/conflicts w3c-dtd-xhtml, and w3c-markup-validator
depends on both packages, so this happens:

joey@wren:~validate index.html
joey@wren:~sudo apt-get install w3c-dtd-xhtml
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
w3c-dtd-xhtml is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 332 not upgraded.
joey@wren:~sudo apt-get install w3c-sgml-lib 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  w3c-dtd-xhtml
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  w3c-sgml-lib
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 332 not upgraded.
Need to get 616 kB of archives.
After this operation, 3,834 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/debian/ unstable/main w3c-sgml-lib all 1.2-1 
[616 kB]
Fetched 616 kB in 0s (7,302 kB/s)
dpkg: w3c-dtd-xhtml: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested:
 wdg-html-validator depends on w3c-dtd-xhtml.
(Reading database ... 154372 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing w3c-dtd-xhtml ...
Selecting previously unselected package w3c-sgml-lib.
(Reading database ... 154310 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking w3c-sgml-lib (from .../w3c-sgml-lib_1.2-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-1) ...
[master c4e89ec] committing changes in /etc after apt run
 Author: joey j...@wren.kitenet.net
 10 files changed, 804 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 sgml/w3c-sgml-lib.cat
 delete mode 100644 xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml
 rewrite xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml.old (82%)
 create mode 100644 xml/w3c-sgml-lib.xml
joey@wren:~validate index.html   
*** Errors validating index.html: ***
Error at line 2, character 53:  cannot find
REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd; tried
/usr/share/xml/xhtml/schema/dtd/1.0/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-str
ict.dtd,
/usr/local/share/sgml/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd,
/usr/share/sgml/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd
Error at line 2, character 53:  DTD did not contain element declaration for
document type name
Error at line 3, character 13:  there is no attribute XMLNS
Error at line 3, character 43:  element HTML undefined
Error at line 4, character 6:  element HEAD undefined
Error at line 5, character 7:  element TITLE undefined
Error at line 7, character 6:  element BODY undefined
Error at line 8, character 3:  element P undefined
Error at line 8, character 24:  element STRONG undefined
zsh: exit 9 validate index.html
joey@wren:~cat index.html 
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
titleikiwiki/title
/head
body
pIkiwiki is a strongwiki compiler/strong./p
/body
/html

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: merging w3c-dtd-xhtml and w3c-sml-lib: ten days to object or find issues

2012-04-19 Thread Nicholas Bamber 
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This 
one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not 
sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to 
resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does NOT have a 
Provides clause.


Please could you send me one or more HTML files that you would accept as 
an objective test as whether wdg-html-validator is working and what you 
expect as an output.


Also please feel free to do something in the bugs world to stop this 
version  going into testing whilst I investigate.




On 20/04/12 00:35, Joey Hess wrote:

Nicholas Bamber wrote:

Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not
afterwards because I tried to test it.


w3c-sgml-lib provides/conflicts w3c-dtd-xhtml, and w3c-markup-validator
depends on both packages, so this happens:

joey@wren:~validate index.html
joey@wren:~sudo apt-get install w3c-dtd-xhtml
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
w3c-dtd-xhtml is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 332 not upgraded.
joey@wren:~sudo apt-get install w3c-sgml-lib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
   w3c-dtd-xhtml
The following NEW packages will be installed:
   w3c-sgml-lib
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 332 not upgraded.
Need to get 616 kB of archives.
After this operation, 3,834 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/debian/ unstable/main w3c-sgml-lib all 1.2-1 
[616 kB]
Fetched 616 kB in 0s (7,302 kB/s)
dpkg: w3c-dtd-xhtml: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested:
  wdg-html-validator depends on w3c-dtd-xhtml.
(Reading database ... 154372 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing w3c-dtd-xhtml ...
Selecting previously unselected package w3c-sgml-lib.
(Reading database ... 154310 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking w3c-sgml-lib (from .../w3c-sgml-lib_1.2-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-1) ...
[master c4e89ec] committing changes in /etc after apt run
  Author: joeyj...@wren.kitenet.net
  10 files changed, 804 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 sgml/w3c-sgml-lib.cat
  delete mode 100644 xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml
  rewrite xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml.old (82%)
  create mode 100644 xml/w3c-sgml-lib.xml
joey@wren:~validate index.html
*** Errors validating index.html: ***
Error at line 2, character 53:  cannot find
REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd; tried
/usr/share/xml/xhtml/schema/dtd/1.0/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-str
ict.dtd,
/usr/local/share/sgml/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd,
/usr/share/sgml/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd
Error at line 2, character 53:  DTD did not contain element declaration for
document type name
Error at line 3, character 13:  there is no attribute XMLNS
Error at line 3, character 43:  element HTML undefined
Error at line 4, character 6:  element HEAD undefined
Error at line 5, character 7:  element TITLE undefined
Error at line 7, character 6:  element BODY undefined
Error at line 8, character 3:  element P undefined
Error at line 8, character 24:  element STRONG undefined
zsh: exit 9 validate index.html
joey@wren:~cat index.html
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
  http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
titleikiwiki/title
/head
body
pIkiwiki is astrongwiki compiler/strong./p
/body
/html




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f90a51f.4010...@periapt.co.uk

Re: merging w3c-dtd-xhtml and w3c-sml-lib: ten days to object or find issues

2012-04-19 Thread Nicholas Bamber 

Joey,
	Also what happens when you force through the installation of 
w3c-dtd-xhtml version 1.2-2 and w3c-sgml-lib? Does wdg-html-validator 
behave itself for you then?


On 20/04/12 00:51, Nicholas Bamber wrote:

Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does NOT have a
Provides clause.

Please could you send me one or more HTML files that you would accept as
an objective test as whether wdg-html-validator is working and what you
expect as an output.

Also please feel free to do something in the bugs world to stop this
version going into testing whilst I investigate.



On 20/04/12 00:35, Joey Hess wrote:

Nicholas Bamber wrote:

Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not
afterwards because I tried to test it.


w3c-sgml-lib provides/conflicts w3c-dtd-xhtml, and w3c-markup-validator
depends on both packages, so this happens:

joey@wren:~validate index.html
joey@wren:~sudo apt-get install w3c-dtd-xhtml
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
w3c-dtd-xhtml is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 332 not upgraded.
joey@wren:~sudo apt-get install w3c-sgml-lib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
w3c-dtd-xhtml
The following NEW packages will be installed:
w3c-sgml-lib
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 332 not upgraded.
Need to get 616 kB of archives.
After this operation, 3,834 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/debian/ unstable/main w3c-sgml-lib
all 1.2-1 [616 kB]
Fetched 616 kB in 0s (7,302 kB/s)
dpkg: w3c-dtd-xhtml: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you
requested:
wdg-html-validator depends on w3c-dtd-xhtml.
(Reading database ... 154372 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing w3c-dtd-xhtml ...
Selecting previously unselected package w3c-sgml-lib.
(Reading database ... 154310 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking w3c-sgml-lib (from .../w3c-sgml-lib_1.2-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-1) ...
[master c4e89ec] committing changes in /etc after apt run
Author: joeyj...@wren.kitenet.net
10 files changed, 804 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 sgml/w3c-sgml-lib.cat
delete mode 100644 xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml
rewrite xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml.old (82%)
create mode 100644 xml/w3c-sgml-lib.xml
joey@wren:~validate index.html
*** Errors validating index.html: ***
Error at line 2, character 53: cannot find
REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd; tried
/usr/share/xml/xhtml/schema/dtd/1.0/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-str
ict.dtd,
/usr/local/share/sgml/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd,
/usr/share/sgml/REC-xhtml1-20020801/xhtml1-strict.dtd
Error at line 2, character 53: DTD did not contain element declaration
for
document type name
Error at line 3, character 13: there is no attribute XMLNS
Error at line 3, character 43: element HTML undefined
Error at line 4, character 6: element HEAD undefined
Error at line 5, character 7: element TITLE undefined
Error at line 7, character 6: element BODY undefined
Error at line 8, character 3: element P undefined
Error at line 8, character 24: element STRONG undefined
zsh: exit 9 validate index.html
joey@wren:~cat index.html
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
titleikiwiki/title
/head
body
pIkiwiki is astrongwiki compiler/strong./p
/body
/html






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f90a94e.8000...@periapt.co.uk

Re: merging w3c-dtd-xhtml and w3c-sml-lib: ten days to object or find issues

2012-04-19 Thread Joey Hess 
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
 Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
 one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
 sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
 resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does NOT have a
 Provides clause.

w3c-sgml-lib 1.2-1 does provide/conflict/replace w3c-dtd-xhtml.

 Please could you send me one or more HTML files that you would accept
 as an objective test as whether wdg-html-validator is working and what
 you expect as an output.

See end of transcript in my previous mail.

   Also what happens when you force through the installation of
 w3c-dtd-xhtml version 1.2-2 and w3c-sgml-lib? Does
 wdg-html-validator behave itself for you then?

update-xmlcatalog: error: entity already registered with a different value
 Entity   : [delegatePublic publicIdStartString=-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for 
XHTML//EN]
 Old value: [catalog=file:///etc/xml/w3c-sgml-lib.xml]
 New value: [catalog=file:///etc/xml/w3c-dtd-xhtml.xml]
dpkg: error processing w3c-dtd-xhtml (--install):

And in this state, no, validate does not work.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature