catwalk is marked for autoremoval from testing
catwalk 2.0.2-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-19 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 750259: python-turbogears2: import tg fails with AttributeError -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1z6aya-0003b9...@franck.debian.org
tg.devtools is marked for autoremoval from testing
tg.devtools 2.0.2-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-19 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 750259: python-turbogears2: import tg fails with AttributeError 779324: van.pydeb: van.pydeb uses a private pkg_resources interface, not available anymore in 12.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1z6ayz-0003an...@franck.debian.org
python-tgext.admin is marked for autoremoval from testing
python-tgext.admin 0.2.6-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-19 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 750259: python-turbogears2: import tg fails with AttributeError -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1z6ayz-0003ax...@franck.debian.org
Bug#772043: marked as done (option parsing 100% broken)
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jun 2015 03:24:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#772043: fixed in github-backup 1.20141204.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #772043, regarding option parsing 100% broken to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 772043: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: guthub-backup Version: 1.20141110 Severity: serious joey@darkstar:~/src/github-backup>./github-backup joeyh Usage: github-backup [USERNAME|ORGANIZATION] [--exclude USERNAME/REPOSITORY] This leaves the program mostly useless, unable to backup all a user's repos, although it can still be run in a git repo to back up just that one single repo. The fix is simple, and I have released a new version upstream that fixes this bug. Here's the entire substantive patch: - owneropt = (argument (Just . Owner)) + owneropt = Owner <$> (argument str) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: github-backup Source-Version: 1.20141204.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of github-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 772...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James McCoy (supplier of updated github-backup package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:32:18 -0400 Source: github-backup Binary: github-backup Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.20141204.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: James McCoy Changed-By: James McCoy Description: github-backup - backs up data from GitHub Closes: 772043 Changes: github-backup (1.20141204.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Set myself as maintainer. . github-backup (1.20141204) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix broken argument parser for the username|organization parameter. Closes: #772043 Checksums-Sha1: 7e764813790da1220f3a0e11b27ddcaec3fa27c5 1886 github-backup_1.20141204.1.dsc 9de30d7b1815fafcf160bfaf679ee1c2df715110 66740 github-backup_1.20141204.1.tar.gz f483e595dda7d3a093d4c5a58e51088890c35cc3 2686590 github-backup_1.20141204.1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 90d06bdd2757eed17fa5e37ea3ef9f94dcea224929b5cfe6e5f3d233dbf80f54 1886 github-backup_1.20141204.1.dsc c899bf12706e056c9939c13d0e21595b3ea1413efd778c26310a284317447026 66740 github-backup_1.20141204.1.tar.gz 27faac929e667a361d9a1465a38dab266ae341f98cea9122fd1925b34f2920ad 2686590 github-backup_1.20141204.1_amd64.deb Files: 439d7837acc6522c73afb97acd79a958 1886 utils optional github-backup_1.20141204.1.dsc 7033f49d31435e774bf9a212c5f98dc6 66740 utils optional github-backup_1.20141204.1.tar.gz bf842faa894d43e8c0eae744ef2f9de6 2686590 utils optional github-backup_1.20141204.1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVhMXIXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ5MUJGQkY0RDY5NTZCRDVERjdCNzJEMjNE RkU2OTFBRTMzMUJBM0RCAAoJEN/mka4zG6PbnBUP/2TbVF3ZKwhgJT0yH89I7Vzh VMNL0ZR70E8cPw77BHiNFFzLZgQ1druEg7e37oI4ZQsHG61bBshyrSnDE0sj6FXH 88MTRR+fFKLPHinRyaZl5V1vIuR6RtpXfVx96xBO95oLlxxj+xz6A2/sYBMA7Mjc d8FBCJJiExLGBIGy1TqAvOzqQ69qofy7Dakv5eym/MEqzvRByfwjC/aRxonwIFxK u6X1S9oUOKrqX9ERKliAfcqOTZA0oifFD+eCBf/nYfCrDlb+sBVZPd1keHe7Z/RL 70w9tThkVJ27iCfOpUKiteJQl4cXkM2h8cyopEWA894N8cAkMJxV5feGCclABHfy HvwPYJHBkso2qUaSJAgYwX/9G3R0rpTcvDiK7spCySm590571i03C8ZWU1xQ1fb7 +26pzAX6YXR6VoLMS0wNHO7zMT4SGOk/bi039OlwCc5PDIyQfD2LRtAncPUjMBqe j6EmkJYwd5HI0krj5eOwJWaNqFMH0Wb+MK1j6Yk7GVWIaRsMWfJDEb07c+UKgEZO is5HwkIKgP2PuPFGrFXeHuBC/aqtY7cA5nMZsFxa+z3MidvUBNuBLmMqsh0g9Jyn G1Bqr3T+0wK2mFl+0xQXiHXy2q0ZaZFuNZQx/gSmSXu70PPRwnPb5z7DsgzHPvWg Qy9V9Jp83WWIeWV6tzJN =6G85 -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#714431: marked as done (github-backup should depend on git)
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:51:16 -0400 with message-id <20150620005116.ga5...@freya.jamessan.com> and subject line Re: Bug#714431: github-backup should depend on git has caused the Debian Bug report #714431, regarding github-backup should depend on git to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 714431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714431 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: github-backup Version: 1.20120628.1 When using github-backup for the first time, I invoked it using the command: github-backup (my github username) It fizzled out after a moment with the error: github-backup: git: executeFile: does not exist (No such file or directory) github-backup: clone failed I tried to clone the repo manually, and found that git was not installed, so ran apt-get install git After this, github-backup worked with the same invocation, in the same directory. I would guess that this means that 'git' should be added as a dependency. -Michael Billington --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.20131006 On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 06:16:58PM +1000, Michael Billington wrote: > When using github-backup for the first time, I invoked it using the command: > > github-backup (my github username) > > It fizzled out after a moment with the error: > > github-backup: git: executeFile: does not exist (No such file or directory) > github-backup: clone failed Thanks for the report! This was fixed, albeit for a different reason, in 1.20131006. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2
(sorry I got the pts email addresses wrong before) On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 13:06 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/19/2015 01:02 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > > Using apt-get with --install-suggests isn't that common so I don't > > think this warrants an RC severity (it doesn't break the package > > for everyone). > > It was RC severity before, see [1]. Furthermore, ROAR audio currently > breaks cmus because of DECnet and the ROAR developers refuse to > remove support for it. From the bug: > RC severity mostly so this shows up on the radars of all the right > people crossing off the details we need to finalise for the release. That doesn't apply here. Hmm I personally can't get cmus to break this way but it could be RC if it breaks in default installations. > > If you look at the status of DECnet: > > > > No kernel maintainer (except general net/ maintenance): > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/M > AINTAINERS?id=v4.1-rc8#n3060 > > > > dnprogs upstream appears to be dead: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-decnet/ > > > > dnprogs is orphaned: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750670 > > Which is my whole point. Then this is a bug in roaraudio / dnprogs, not cmus. > > IMHO dnprogs should be removed and roaraudio should drop support > > for DECnet - unless someone who actually uses DECnet is willing to > > maintain this stuff. > > The ROAR developers and maintainers refuse to do that which is why > we should drop it from cmus. They, for some reason, think it's important > to support a pre-historic networking protocol. I found this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675014 This is the newer one: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755934 But I couldn't find any evidence the _current_ maintainer of roaraudio has refused to remove DECnet support. The current bug about it has no replies. James signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
